[onap-discuss] pairwise testing between MultiCloud and OOF

Dear Sarat, Would you please suggest how to conduct the pairwise testing between OOF and MultiCloud? As my understanding, the capacity check API has already been verified from Beijing Release, so should we test it again in this release? Another interaction is indirect and

[onap-discuss] user/pass for appc api index with OOM deployed ONAP

Hi Taka As I am going to do some simple pairwise testing between APPC and multicloud, I found that the user/pass (which was admin/admin) is not valid while I am trying to access the following apidox index: http://10.12.6.138:30230/apidoc/explorer/index.html Would you please shed some light

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

This is a good question -- there is a lot of overlap in functionality. The main difference is that Kong only operates at level 7 and supports only APIs. But for APIs it has many more features beyond what Envoy can offer, and the deployment is more sensible: Envoy requires proxies at both sides of

[onap-discuss] updated CII Badging dashboard for ONAP

From the ONAP wiki page for CII Badging (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CII+Badging+Program), there is a link to a dashboard (http://tlhansen.us/onap/cii.html) showing the current CII badging status for all ONAP projects. It’s been updated to have a set of displays lower down that will show

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

Hi Tal, Does Kong has place if ISTIO is adopted (with ISTIO-ingress)? Thanks Srini From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Tal Liron Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 5:56 AM To: onap-discuss Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released I have

[onap-discuss] S3P and the adoption of ONAP normative container base images in Dublin

Hello Jason, The CIA project has identified a set of normative container base images to the adopted by all ONAP projects in Dublin. Both the Integration project and ONAP PTLs have expressed support for the adoption of these

[onap-discuss] [docs] Reminder: Vote on day and time for the docs meeting

Friendly reminder! If you are interested in joining the docs project, please add preferable time slot. The poll will be closing Thursday this week. Best regards, Sofia From: Sofia Wallin Date: Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 10:59 To: "jh2...@att.com" , rich bennett , "timo.per...@nokia.com" ,

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

I have nothing specific in mind, just everything. :) We would benefit if we can switch to using an upstream project with broad industry support. It's worth evaluating. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:19 AM 赵化冰 wrote: > Hi Tal, > Good point! > Sorry for the late, it was the national holiday in China

[onap-discuss] Do you know why get this error

Hi Itohan, I setup rancher in host according to onap-on-kubernetes-with-rancher. When I execute [1], I got the below error. Anyone know how to fix it? Thank you very

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

Hi Tal, Good point! Sorry for the late, it was the national holiday in China last week. It definitely worths looking into the Kong, actually, the ideas behind MSB and Kong are very similar, we could explore the enhancements borrowed from Kong what can benefit ONAP. Do you have anything in