Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

Srini > > > > > > *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] *On > Behalf Of *Tal Liron > *Sent:* Monday, October 8, 2018 5:56 AM > *To:* onap-discuss > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released > > > > I have

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

Hi Tal, Does Kong has place if ISTIO is adopted (with ISTIO-ingress)? Thanks Srini From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Tal Liron Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 5:56 AM To: onap-discuss Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released I have

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

I have nothing specific in mind, just everything. :) We would benefit if we can switch to using an upstream project with broad industry support. It's worth evaluating. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:19 AM 赵化冰 wrote: > Hi Tal, > Good point! > Sorry for the late, it was the national holiday in China

Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

Hi Tal, Good point! Sorry for the late, it was the national holiday in China last week. It definitely worths looking into the Kong, actually, the ideas behind MSB and Kong are very similar, we could explore the enhancements borrowed from Kong what can benefit ONAP. Do you have anything in

[onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released

Hi MSB folk, Kong 1.0 was just released. I see it as having some overlap with MSB, and it's used quite a lot in the enterprise. Perhaps it's worth looking into it as a supplement or replacement? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this