Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
Hi all, this is just what i was looking for!!! After some weeks configuring the ONAP platform in my local environment, it's time to test it but the vFW onboarding process is a not simple task: - robot's k8s-demo fails for me because my quuens openstack installation changed the keystone API - I was trying manually with https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1018474, but uses an old version of SDC that does not match with mine (beijing) What is the status of this "test VNF" task? Is there any recent related documentation about how to test the platform with a simply VNF? @Andrew, is your dummy VNF available? Thanks, Santiago 2018-08-10 17:04 GMT+02:00 Eric Debeau : > Yes, I know Guillaume ;-) > > > > I added a few guys working on that topic. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Eric > > > > *De :* FREEMAN, BRIAN D [mailto:bf1...@att.com] > *Envoyé :* vendredi 10 août 2018 15:35 > *À :* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; PLATANIA, MARCO; > andrew.fen...@ericsson.com > *Cc :* Ajith Sreekumar; DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN > *Objet :* RE: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF > > > > SDNC supports netconf as well – it just needed to be activated – I asked > Dan to include that in future SDNC persona’s (its can be done after the > controller is brought up but its a one line change in the config to do it > as part of initial install so might as well) > > > > WRT to the honeycomb VNF I think that is the right path since we would get > both a config and operational tree to drive closed loops (with memory) > > > > I havent tried this but I got the reference from our OpenROADM folks who > are working on TransportPCE with Orange and others. > > > > Maybe Eric knows guillaume.lamb...@orange.com (but its a big company) ? > > > > https://github.com/opendaylight/transportpce/tree/master/tests/honeynode > > > > Brian > > > > > > *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org *On > Behalf Of *PLATANIA, MARCO > *Sent:* Friday, August 10, 2018 9:26 AM > *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; andrew.fen...@ericsson.com > *Cc:* Ajith Sreekumar > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF > > > > Security Advisory:* This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** > Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. > > Andrew, > > > > I think it’s a good idea. I remember we talked about this a while ago, and > I still believe it’s worth the effort. In particular, I agree on > implementing APIs that can be used by controllers to execute LCM operations > against the VNFs. In this regard, we have experience with Honeycomb, which > we extensively used for the vFW and vLB use cases. The good news is that > Honeycomb supports both Netconf and Rest APIs, which makes it even more > appealing, considering that we also want SDNC to be able to talk to the VNF > (SDNC supports Rest at this time). > > > > Let’s talk on Wednesday during the integration meeting. > > > > Marco > > > > *From: * on behalf of Andrew Fenner < > andrew.fen...@ericsson.com> > *Reply-To: *"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , " > andrew.fen...@ericsson.com" > *Date: *Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:22 AM > *To: *"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" > *Cc: *Ajith Sreekumar > *Subject: *[onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF > > > > Hi, > > > > At the last Integration team meeting there was a discussion about the need > for a test VNF which had a different focus to the vFW that we are using now. > > > > I had created a task some time ago related to this and it seems like there > is some enthusiasm for this now so I will try to follow up an report back > to the integration team with a way forward. > > > > Can you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_INT-2D355&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=ibOFZltoPF0bkEA9xNBD7bKypd1rrFSPF5varoQJ5Xg&e=> > for my initial thinking and look at > > https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/ > BeijingDevForum2017-Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate= > 1513294598000&api=v2 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_16002054_BeijingDevForum2017-2DDec-2D13-2Dmain-2D0.mp4-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1513294598000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPW
Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
Yes, I know Guillaume ;-) I added a few guys working on that topic. Best Regards Eric De : FREEMAN, BRIAN D [mailto:bf1...@att.com] Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2018 15:35 À : onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; PLATANIA, MARCO; andrew.fen...@ericsson.com Cc : Ajith Sreekumar; DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN Objet : RE: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF SDNC supports netconf as well – it just needed to be activated – I asked Dan to include that in future SDNC persona’s (its can be done after the controller is brought up but its a one line change in the config to do it as part of initial install so might as well) WRT to the honeycomb VNF I think that is the right path since we would get both a config and operational tree to drive closed loops (with memory) I havent tried this but I got the reference from our OpenROADM folks who are working on TransportPCE with Orange and others. Maybe Eric knows guillaume.lamb...@orange.com<mailto:guillaume.lamb...@orange.com> (but its a big company) ? https://github.com/opendaylight/transportpce/tree/master/tests/honeynode Brian From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:26 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; andrew.fen...@ericsson.com Cc: Ajith Sreekumar Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Andrew, I think it’s a good idea. I remember we talked about this a while ago, and I still believe it’s worth the effort. In particular, I agree on implementing APIs that can be used by controllers to execute LCM operations against the VNFs. In this regard, we have experience with Honeycomb, which we extensively used for the vFW and vLB use cases. The good news is that Honeycomb supports both Netconf and Rest APIs, which makes it even more appealing, considering that we also want SDNC to be able to talk to the VNF (SDNC supports Rest at this time). Let’s talk on Wednesday during the integration meeting. Marco From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Andrew Fenner mailto:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>> Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "andrew.fen...@ericsson.com<mailto:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>" mailto:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>> Date: Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:22 AM To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Cc: Ajith Sreekumar mailto:ajith.sreeku...@ericsson.com>> Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF Hi, At the last Integration team meeting there was a discussion about the need for a test VNF which had a different focus to the vFW that we are using now. I had created a task some time ago related to this and it seems like there is some enthusiasm for this now so I will try to follow up an report back to the integration team with a way forward. Can you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_INT-2D355&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=ibOFZltoPF0bkEA9xNBD7bKypd1rrFSPF5varoQJ5Xg&e=> for my initial thinking and look at https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/BeijingDevForum2017-Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate=1513294598000&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_16002054_BeijingDevForum2017-2DDec-2D13-2Dmain-2D0.mp4-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1513294598000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=1kbesoZGUTOzmw6ydCi1WhSY5BV8DTRctGOS1WO5MlE&e=> @ 05:26:40 and https://onapbeijing2017.sched.com/event/D5pg/progressing-onap-testing-and-integration-with-a-dummy-vnf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__onapbeijing2017.sched.com_event_D5pg_progressing-2Donap-2Dtesting-2Dand-2Dintegration-2Dwith-2Da-2Ddummy-2Dvnf&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=R-deEQaZaXONCieoHBCJ8rX2fy-dQvKw6hPn6H-Jw6E&e=> & https://schd.ws/hosted_files/onapbeijing2017/49/ONAP-DummyVNF.pptx<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_onapbeijing2017_49_ONAP-2DDummyVNF.pptx&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=CLVsv8ZdTFpNfQc82vQ7K9MXnBRLHUoH3_
Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
SDNC supports netconf as well – it just needed to be activated – I asked Dan to include that in future SDNC persona’s (its can be done after the controller is brought up but its a one line change in the config to do it as part of initial install so might as well) WRT to the honeycomb VNF I think that is the right path since we would get both a config and operational tree to drive closed loops (with memory) I havent tried this but I got the reference from our OpenROADM folks who are working on TransportPCE with Orange and others. Maybe Eric knows guillaume.lamb...@orange.com<mailto:guillaume.lamb...@orange.com> (but its a big company) ? https://github.com/opendaylight/transportpce/tree/master/tests/honeynode Brian From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 9:26 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; andrew.fen...@ericsson.com Cc: Ajith Sreekumar Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Andrew, I think it’s a good idea. I remember we talked about this a while ago, and I still believe it’s worth the effort. In particular, I agree on implementing APIs that can be used by controllers to execute LCM operations against the VNFs. In this regard, we have experience with Honeycomb, which we extensively used for the vFW and vLB use cases. The good news is that Honeycomb supports both Netconf and Rest APIs, which makes it even more appealing, considering that we also want SDNC to be able to talk to the VNF (SDNC supports Rest at this time). Let’s talk on Wednesday during the integration meeting. Marco From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Andrew Fenner mailto:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>> Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "andrew.fen...@ericsson.com<mailto:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>" mailto:andrew.fen...@ericsson.com>> Date: Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:22 AM To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Cc: Ajith Sreekumar mailto:ajith.sreeku...@ericsson.com>> Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF Hi, At the last Integration team meeting there was a discussion about the need for a test VNF which had a different focus to the vFW that we are using now. I had created a task some time ago related to this and it seems like there is some enthusiasm for this now so I will try to follow up an report back to the integration team with a way forward. Can you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_INT-2D355&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=ibOFZltoPF0bkEA9xNBD7bKypd1rrFSPF5varoQJ5Xg&e=> for my initial thinking and look at https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/BeijingDevForum2017-Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate=1513294598000&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_16002054_BeijingDevForum2017-2DDec-2D13-2Dmain-2D0.mp4-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1513294598000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=1kbesoZGUTOzmw6ydCi1WhSY5BV8DTRctGOS1WO5MlE&e=> @ 05:26:40 and https://onapbeijing2017.sched.com/event/D5pg/progressing-onap-testing-and-integration-with-a-dummy-vnf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__onapbeijing2017.sched.com_event_D5pg_progressing-2Donap-2Dtesting-2Dand-2Dintegration-2Dwith-2Da-2Ddummy-2Dvnf&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=R-deEQaZaXONCieoHBCJ8rX2fy-dQvKw6hPn6H-Jw6E&e=> & https://schd.ws/hosted_files/onapbeijing2017/49/ONAP-DummyVNF.pptx<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_onapbeijing2017_49_ONAP-2DDummyVNF.pptx&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=CLVsv8ZdTFpNfQc82vQ7K9MXnBRLHUoH3_A-ALW2r_0&e=> I have created a sub tack which is to try and move the story forward. I intend to report back to the Integration team next week. At this stage I would like to confirm requirements and find proposed ways forward e.g. do we develop something ourselves can we inherit something from some other opensource project etc. Please reply to this threa
Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
Andrew, I think it’s a good idea. I remember we talked about this a while ago, and I still believe it’s worth the effort. In particular, I agree on implementing APIs that can be used by controllers to execute LCM operations against the VNFs. In this regard, we have experience with Honeycomb, which we extensively used for the vFW and vLB use cases. The good news is that Honeycomb supports both Netconf and Rest APIs, which makes it even more appealing, considering that we also want SDNC to be able to talk to the VNF (SDNC supports Rest at this time). Let’s talk on Wednesday during the integration meeting. Marco From: on behalf of Andrew Fenner Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , "andrew.fen...@ericsson.com" Date: Friday, August 10, 2018 at 5:22 AM To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" Cc: Ajith Sreekumar Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF Hi, At the last Integration team meeting there was a discussion about the need for a test VNF which had a different focus to the vFW that we are using now. I had created a task some time ago related to this and it seems like there is some enthusiasm for this now so I will try to follow up an report back to the integration team with a way forward. Can you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_INT-2D355&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=ibOFZltoPF0bkEA9xNBD7bKypd1rrFSPF5varoQJ5Xg&e=> for my initial thinking and look at https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/BeijingDevForum2017-Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate=1513294598000&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_16002054_BeijingDevForum2017-2DDec-2D13-2Dmain-2D0.mp4-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1513294598000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=1kbesoZGUTOzmw6ydCi1WhSY5BV8DTRctGOS1WO5MlE&e=> @ 05:26:40 and https://onapbeijing2017.sched.com/event/D5pg/progressing-onap-testing-and-integration-with-a-dummy-vnf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__onapbeijing2017.sched.com_event_D5pg_progressing-2Donap-2Dtesting-2Dand-2Dintegration-2Dwith-2Da-2Ddummy-2Dvnf&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=R-deEQaZaXONCieoHBCJ8rX2fy-dQvKw6hPn6H-Jw6E&e=> & https://schd.ws/hosted_files/onapbeijing2017/49/ONAP-DummyVNF.pptx<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_onapbeijing2017_49_ONAP-2DDummyVNF.pptx&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=kG12w7U2YM6hhEUwEZyHPSVusPMPWJNSYMD-oCm2LeE&s=CLVsv8ZdTFpNfQc82vQ7K9MXnBRLHUoH3_A-ALW2r_0&e=> I have created a sub tack which is to try and move the story forward. I intend to report back to the Integration team next week. At this stage I would like to confirm requirements and find proposed ways forward e.g. do we develop something ourselves can we inherit something from some other opensource project etc. Please reply to this thread with any ideas/proposals or leave comments on the JIRA and I will correlate it back to the integration team for a proposed way forward. /Andrew PS: I have previously made a “dummy” VNF which was just an extension of the Apache MINA project with a “toy” netconf subsystem added. This didn’t supply a netconf server as it had no persistence but it allowed APPC to communicate with the endpoint exposed. It allowed the responses to be configured in runtime via groovy scripts with no compile time effort. I’m not sure if this a good way to proceed as it would mean us (ONAP) developing and maintaining a test VNF. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11823): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11823 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24246713/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[onap-discuss] [integration] [VNFSDK] Creating a TEST VNF
Hi, At the last Integration team meeting there was a discussion about the need for a test VNF which had a different focus to the vFW that we are using now. I had created a task some time ago related to this and it seems like there is some enthusiasm for this now so I will try to follow up an report back to the integration team with a way forward. Can you please look at the Jira https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-355 for my initial thinking and look at https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/BeijingDevForum2017-Dec-13-main-0.mp4?version=1&modificationDate=1513294598000&api=v2 @ 05:26:40 and https://onapbeijing2017.sched.com/event/D5pg/progressing-onap-testing-and-integration-with-a-dummy-vnf & https://schd.ws/hosted_files/onapbeijing2017/49/ONAP-DummyVNF.pptx I have created a sub tack which is to try and move the story forward. I intend to report back to the Integration team next week. At this stage I would like to confirm requirements and find proposed ways forward e.g. do we develop something ourselves can we inherit something from some other opensource project etc. Please reply to this thread with any ideas/proposals or leave comments on the JIRA and I will correlate it back to the integration team for a proposed way forward. /Andrew PS: I have previously made a “dummy” VNF which was just an extension of the Apache MINA project with a “toy” netconf subsystem added. This didn’t supply a netconf server as it had no persistence but it allowed APPC to communicate with the endpoint exposed. It allowed the responses to be configured in runtime via groovy scripts with no compile time effort. I’m not sure if this a good way to proceed as it would mean us (ONAP) developing and maintaining a test VNF. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11812): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11812 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24246713/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
