Let’s invest few minutes at the TSC meeting to give status on this effort
and push things forward. I would like the TSC to approve the formation of the
subcommittee.
LF has proposed a multi-level training program for
ONAP. We need to review with this subcommittee.
Mazin
On Sep 11, 2017, at 4
Vladimir--the PTLs for the respective modules are responsible for providing
complete and accurate descriptions of the purpose, goals, current state and
gotchas of their areas to the content people in the course of our
preliminary interview work. The goal of this phase is to be clear about
the good
Dear ONAP Community,
I want to start an email dialog which we will follow up in our Paris meeting on
technical measures of success of the ONAP platform.
What measures we should track and make publicly visible in PR events? I know
LOC has been used already. This seems like one
of 2-3 other measur
Lisa,
Thanks for useful update.
My question was more of who and how will decide e.g. on functions and interface
concept of sub-systems like DCAE, SDN-C etc. These are complex and sometimes
controversial issues. The Architecture sub-committee does not have plans for
documenting that; therefore th
Interesting presentations on ETSI NFV
https://nfvwiki.etsi.org/index.php?title=ETSI_NFV_Tutorial
_
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confiden
