[onap-tsc] [ONAP Helpdesk #55393] [LOG] New repo request for logging-analytics - add new java and python child repos

2018-04-30 Thread Anil Belur via RT
On Mon Apr 30 18:33:09 2018, frank.obr...@amdocs.com wrote: > I was ok with moving code between the repos > > Sounds good, Having a hard time with the mixed python and java code > from the single root pom.xml that is picked up by Jenkins jobs - It > may not have been a good idea to mix the 2

[onap-tsc] ONAP RC1 Release candidate 1 for Beijing Release

2018-04-30 Thread Gildas Lanilis
Hi PTLs, I wanted to follow up on the discussion we had at weekly PTL meeting today. RC1 is coming this Thursday, May 3. As usual, fill out the template. Please make it possible to join the bridge or send out a

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP Helpdesk #55393] [LOG] New repo request for logging-analytics - add new java and python child repos

2018-04-30 Thread Michael O'Brien via RT
I was ok with moving code between the repos Sounds good, Having a hard time with the mixed python and java code from the single root pom.xml that is picked up by Jenkins jobs - It may not have been a good idea to mix the 2 technologies in a single repo. I'll work through the issues as I try to

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP Helpdesk #55393] [LOG] New repo request for logging-analytics - add new java and python child repos

2018-04-30 Thread Gildas Lanilis via RT
Hi Michael, Currently for logging there is 1 repo labelled "logging-analytics". This repo can't be renamed. LF will need to create 2 new repo > Logging-analytics/java > Logging-analytics/python And you will need to move the code appropriately, then LF will need to lock the " logging-analytics"

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP Helpdesk #55393] [LOG] New repo request for logging-analytics - add new java and python child repos

2018-04-30 Thread Gildas Lanilis
Hi Michael, Currently for logging there is 1 repo labelled "logging-analytics". This repo can't be renamed. LF will need to create 2 new repo > Logging-analytics/java > Logging-analytics/python And you will need to move the code appropriately, then LF will need to lock the " logging-analytics"

[onap-tsc] Nexus3 docker pull speed issue - good call - may be narrowed to the nexus3 JVM

2018-04-30 Thread Michael O'Brien
Jessica, Jeremy and LF and ONAP team on the call, I think some triage was good - your suggestion on issues with the JVM config look right on - we just need to profile/capture with jconsole etc... The paused download behavior is very consistent with a blocked thread on the nexus3 side. I

[onap-tsc] [ONAP Helpdesk #55415] nexus3 slowdown (burst/pause) behavior - propose 2nd LF meeting

2018-04-30 Thread Jessica Wagantall via RT
did see this pause behavior briefly for a > couple seconds back even in Dec. > > > I propose we meet again to test downloads again and get some > volumetrics. > Some details on this and previous issues in > > https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-933 > > Time 1130 EST 201

[onap-tsc] nexus3 slowdown (burst/pause) behavior - propose 2nd LF meeting

2018-04-30 Thread Michael O'Brien
in Dec. I propose we meet again to test downloads again and get some volumetrics. Some details on this and previous issues in https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-933 Time 1130 EST 20180430 see slowdown again after our last meeting - a burst behaviour (burst/hold in 30-60 sec intervals

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-arc] Casablanca use cases: Feedback received from EUAG (Service Providers) so far

2018-04-30 Thread DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
Alla, For the Verizon request “Fine grained RBAC for deployment dashboardz’. The Policy Framework project can support this request via the use of the XACML PDP engine. What I request is that Verizon provide resources to the project to help facilitate this work for Casablanca. In response to

[onap-tsc] Casablanca use cases: Feedback received from EUAG (Service Providers) so far

2018-04-30 Thread Alla Goldner
Hi all, For your information, please see below feedback on priorities of use cases/requirements received from Service Providers so far. We will discuss these and additional requirements from Service Providers, attending the call. Requirements from Verizon, in the order of priority: