：2018年07月24日 05:10
主 题 ：Re: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
My understanding is that SO will include a Proof of Concept to support SOL-003
in the Casablanca release. This does not change any support for VNFMs in VF-C.
It only demonstrates support for SVNFMs in operator
ilto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>>,
"anatoly.andria...@nokia.com<mailto:anatoly.andria...@nokia.com>"
mailto:anatoly.andria...@nokia.com>>,
"gil.bull...@att.com<mailto:gil.bull...@att.com>"
mailto:gil.bull...@att.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architectu
(Chris)
Subject: 答复: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi
+1 on maopeng’s comments.
We already do a lot in ONAP R1 & R2, and plan continue work on ETSI NFV
alignment in VFC during ONAP R3. So why and in which usecase to try to do it in
another way?
I agree ONAP as plat
.org; Christopher Donley (Chris)
主题: 答复: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi John
Very interested in the ETSI SOL related discussion:
Some backgrounds from my experiences in VFC project and SO project:
In ONAP R1, There is SOL005 interface between th
：2018年07月19日 22:02
主 题 ：[onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi Chris
Thanks for pulling this together. Two quick observation/questions
The work on the standards alignment could be clearer on where it is impacting
on Casablanca. On Slide 8 it is easy to miss
[mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of
John Q
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:26 AM
To: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org; christopher.don...@huawei.com
Subject: [onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi Chris
Thanks for pulling this together. Two quick observation/questions
Hi Chris
Thanks for pulling this together. Two quick observation/questions
The work on the standards alignment could be clearer on where it is impacting
on Casablanca. On Slide 8 it is easy to miss the targeted SOL003 VNFM plugin
for SO.
I just have a quick question should the slide from
