Am 07/21/2011 03:16 AM, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
Thanks for the info. Note that it would be helpful if people interested
in working with trademarks read the Apache policies, as well as our
growing list of FAQs:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/
On 21 July 2011 10:33, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/21/2011 03:16 AM, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
Thanks for the info. Note that it would be helpful if people interested
in working with trademarks read the Apache policies, as well as our
growing list of FAQs:
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, 2011-07-21 09:21:45 +0800, Peter Junge wrote:
Once this is cooked, I'm eager for us to pick up the threads on trademark
enforcement against subscription fraud abusers of the trademarks.
This is indeed a big and painful issue that should somehow be
tackled. I think
From: Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Native Language vs l10n
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:20:06 +0900
Hi Dennis and all,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Hello, Khirano-san (that OK with nickname/UserID?),
OK :) See the bottom
The Connector for MS SharePoint (also for Alfresco's CMS and Oracle's
Universal Content Management (UCM)) wasn't part of the OOo development.
It was working for OOo, too, yes, but the main point was to have it for
StarOffice resp. Oracle Open Office.
I don't think it will be part of the grant
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
The Connector for MS SharePoint (also for Alfresco's CMS and Oracle's
Universal Content Management (UCM)) wasn't part of the OOo development.
It was working for OOo, too, yes, but the main point was to have it for
On 07/20/2011 12:05 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, 2011-07-19 23:26:48 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
unfortunately it seems none of the tools that convert from HG or git
to SVN can create SVN branches with SVN mergeinfo (necessary in
order to be able to merge the branches back
cool proposal, +1
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Apologies to those who have received multiple copies of this message.
I've cc'ed members of the Apache POI project, the Apache OpenOffice
podling and the ODF Toolkit Union, due to the prior interest they've
Hi Marcus,
Being able to connect is the key to success. In many organisations
OpenOffice.org (Symphony, LibreOffice, etc.) is part of a heterogeneous
environment. For sure I am not the only one that sees the benefits of
having the connector on board.
--
Regards/groeten,
Arthur Buijs
On
On 21 Jul 2011, at 06:31, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/21/2011 01:11 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke:
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, 2011-07-21 09:21:45 +0800, Peter Junge wrote:
Once this is cooked, I'm eager for us to pick up the threads on trademark
enforcement against subscription fraud abusers of the
On 7/21/2011 11:14 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 21 Jul 2011, at 06:31, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/21/2011 01:11 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke:
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, 2011-07-21 09:21:45 +0800, Peter Junge wrote:
Once this is cooked, I'm eager for us to pick up the threads on trademark
OK. So let's outline a trademark policy. As a strawman I'd propose:
We add a webpage called Trademark policy that states states that
Apache owns the trademarked name and logo, that there are certain uses
of these trademarks that that require no permission from us, but that
we require permission
Greetings to all developers of OpenOffice.org in Apache,
I am writing to you to make a suggestion for the branding of OpenOffice.org.
After Oracle bought Sun they decided to simplify document icons by changing the
color coding to a unified blue color. This was a departure for the previous
Michael,
Might I suggest doing both- colour-coding and some difference between the
icon symbol.. to assist those 20% of us who are colourblind to some extent.
Wolf
On Jul 21, 2011 5:43 PM, Michael Acevedo vea1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Greetings to all developers of OpenOffice.org in Apache,
I am
Am 07/21/2011 11:35 PM, schrieb Michael Acevedo:
Greetings to all developers of OpenOffice.org in Apache,
I am writing to you to make a suggestion for the branding of
OpenOffice.org. After Oracle bought Sun they decided to simplify
document icons by changing the color codingto a unified blue
Am 07/22/2011 12:57 AM, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
Note that Tightrope has abandoned their US trademark application for
OPENOFFICE. Yay!
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serialentry=85298190
Great to know, thanks for the link. :-)
Marcus
On 7/21/2011 2:14 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
I think the best way of handling these types of changes is to create
alternate 'themes', and later determine which theme is the default, and
which will ship with the product. I'm not sure how this works with the
current layout of source control, but it should not be a major problem.
Through
One key question is whether the ODF icons belong with OpenOffice.org.[1][2] or
with the ODF Toolkit [3][4]
The icon repository is here.[5]
In the OOo wiki there is a page with links to Icon guides for several platforms
along with some of the considerations for the unified versions.[6]
If you
Yes, the LibreOffice icons are different. The overall theme is green, not
blue. The general symbol is a page with a large corner cut and a dark corner
exposed beneath.
The lines and the dark corner are different colors for the different
applications within LibreOffice. For larger versions
Thanks. They are nice.
I like what LibreOffice has done with regard to coloring the outline and
background behind the corner cut/fold and providing a color image in the center
of larger icons. These are more indicative than the colors alone, it seems to
me.
Also, using ODF in those boxes is
Please follow the link below to see the renderings...
https://skydrive.live.com/#!/?cid=69f0fbe8e03b2c13sc=documentsnl=1uc=1id=69F0FBE8E03B2C13%211171!cid=69F0FBE8E03B2C13id=69F0FBE8E03B2C13%211172sc=documents
Michael
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
There are 20 Initial Committers on the OpenOffice.org incubator proposal who
have not yet submitted iCLAs or informed us of their intention not to do so.
Today I used the following format for a message to one of those Initial
Committers.
Before 19 more of these are sent out I wanted to check
22 matches
Mail list logo
