On 26.06.2012 22:56, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi Andre,
There may be minor problems with the OS/2 port. I don't have that
I did a preliminary test on my existing tree. I regenerated configure
script and I ran it again adding the new switches.
But I don't get the build system to enter
KG02 - See comments inline.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
Added one example (and fixed a typo on the table headings) to see how
it works.
KG01 - Good stuff. Thanks for getting the ball rolling.
I think description
Simon,
I agree too add the new platform to the list. As the test I did before
against Win 8 dev preview release, I don't see any risk to support Windows
8.
2012/6/26 Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com
Yan Ji,
Sorry for the late response. While I saw some people are working on the
Windows 8
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1].
Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three
defects are not really blocker issue.
Bug 119272 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
I
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 08:44, Jianyuan Li wrote:
Hi, all,
In ../sc/inc/tabprotection.hxx, a macro is defined as below:
#define ENABLE_SHEET_PROTECTION 0
So all blocks controlled by it will not be executed:
1. Import/export Sheet/Doc protection password for a protected xls file.
2. Import a
On 6/27/12 4:05 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
Due to my job role change, I have to spend much time on new position to
face many challenges, so I may haven't much time on AOO. But I will surely
keep one eye on this project and continuous contribute my effort on it.
For weekly QA report, I
In my opinion only controversial issues should to be discussed on this
mailing list to increase the signal to noise ratio. Not everyone agrees
with this pragmatic approach so here is my request:
The fix for issue 119997 should be merged into AOO 3.4.1
Herbert
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 08:57, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi lou ql
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:30:12PM +0800, lou ql wrote:
Today I tested RPM build r1351960:
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating-Dev_AOO341m1_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
There are no desktop-integration rpm packages...
On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set 3.4.1_release_blocker?[1].
Totally 13 defects have this flag. As reviewed I thought following three
defects are not really blocker issue.
Bug 119272
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 16:07, Lin Yuan wrote:
In cws vmiklos01, the field export for rtf filter and ms word filter is
integrated into AttributeOutputBase::TextField() in
sw\source\filter\ww8\ww8atr.cxx . However, the processing for user field
and db field is different for rtf and ms word filter. And
Hi,
just some nit picking...
Am 27.06.2012 03:23, schrieb Lin Yuan:
Currently in AOO, only part of the data in user profile is locked and can
not access by mutiple instances. So as tested on Windows Server 2008, AOO
will crash in such situation. The patch is not to really support one user
to
OpenOffice has always been easy to use and very reliable. However this Open
Office Apache is a piece of crap. I’ve only used word, and it’s shut down on me
numerous times. And whenever I’ve clicked to see/send an error report...it just
reopens my document. I’m tired of dealing with this crap,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 08:57, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi lou ql
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:30:12PM +0800, lou ql wrote:
Today I tested RPM build r1351960:
Hi Lily,
On 27.06.2012 09:13, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 4:05 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
Due to my job role change, I have to spend much time on new position to
face many challenges, so I may haven't much time on AOO. But I will surely
keep one eye on this project and continuous
Thanks a lot!
2012/6/26 Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org
On 26.06.2012 12:05, shzh zhao wrote:
2012/6/18 shzh zhao aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com
[...]
LNK2019: unresolved external symbol __imp__JAWT_GetAWT@8 referenced in
This could be this problem discussed in this Java forum:
Hi Allison,
I have to say sorry for that..Could you please provide more details of your
problems to us? Thus, we can solve them in time and make AOO better to
satisfy you in next release,and also benefit other end users.Thanks in
advance.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Allison Barnes
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 09:17, Herbert Duerr wrote:
In my opinion only controversial issues should to be discussed on this mailing
list to increase the signal to noise ratio. Not everyone agrees with this
pragmatic approach so here is my request:
The fix for issue 119997 should be merged into AOO
Allison is not subscribed to this list so I forward the message.
Allison,
it would be really helpful if you can give us some more details. The
crash report feature should be disabled at the moment.
Which platform are you using?
Do you have a test document that you can share with us to
On 27.06.2012 09:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set
3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As
reviewed I thought following three defects are not really
Hi,
Allison will not get this reply, the message was moderated as the header
Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org indicates.
Peter
On 6/27/2012 4:27 PM, chengjh wrote:
Hi Allison,
I have to say sorry for that..Could you please provide more details of your
problems to
Thanks to the reminder from Juergen and Petter.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org wrote:
Hi,
Allison will not get this reply, the message was moderated as the header
Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org indicates.
Peter
On 6/27/2012
On 6/27/12 10:44 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 27.06.2012 09:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 27.06.2012 09:06, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/27/12 7:42 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
I went through bugzilla defects with flag set
3.4.1_release_blocker?[1]. Totally 13 defects have this flag. As
reviewed I thought
On 6/27/12 3:23 AM, Lin Yuan wrote:
Currently in AOO, only part of the data in user profile is locked and can
not access by mutiple instances. So as tested on Windows Server 2008, AOO
will crash in such situation. The patch is not to really support one user
to launch multiple instances on
Fixed.
On 27.06.2012 08:51, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 26.06.2012 22:56, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi Andre,
There may be minor problems with the OS/2 port. I don't have that
I did a preliminary test on my existing tree. I regenerated configure
script and I ran it again adding the new switches.
But
Hi,
I am sorry - again some stuff regarding our update service.
As it has been pointed out in [1] there are some more OOo versions out there for
which we can activate the update service.
Thus, I am proposing to activate the update service for installed OOo 3.2 and
OOo 3.2.1 instances for
I support this suggestion too. This memory leak is in fundamental vcl
module and frequently happens when drawing text strings, it's severity
is far enough for 3.4.1.
zhangjf
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
In my opinion only controversial issues should to
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 10:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/26/12 10:24 AM, YangTerry wrote:
+1 to make this issue a release blocker
I tend to agree, do we have a volunteer who want to work on this?
It looks like that the crash only occurs on Linux.
Ariel has provided a patch and tested it under
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 11:58, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 26.06.2012 10:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/26/12 10:24 AM, YangTerry wrote:
+1 to make this issue a release blocker
I tend to agree, do we have a volunteer who want to work on this?
It looks like that the crash only
On 27/giu/2012, at 11:30, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry - again some stuff regarding our update service.
As it has been pointed out in [1] there are some more OOo versions out there
for which we can activate the update service.
Thus, I am
Merge done.
On 26.06.2012 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space
consumption by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details). The fix
reduces the used disk space by 50%. It does so by removing unused
temporary files.
The probability
Hi all,
I have a fix to for bug 120039, please review the patch attached to:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120039
Regards - Zuojun
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry - again some stuff regarding our update service.
As it has been pointed out in [1] there are some more OOo versions out there
for which we can activate the update service.
Thus, I am
Also requesting that the fix for issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
gets integrated into AOO 3.4.1.
Herbert
With the new round of hand-written request-for-blocker-flag mails I'd
like to reintroduce the automatism I had suggested a while ago [1]:
When someone requests a release blocker flag in bugzilla then an
automatic mail to either this or to the ooo-issues list should be generated.
A couple of
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 13:58, chengjh wrote:
This is the I implementation of the proposal described in thread Propose
to Implement the Loading of TOC and Improve TOC Fidelity with MS Word
Binary Document..review comments expected...
On Thu,
Hello,
Unable to report a spam comment
See : http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/PhotoAlbum
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 15:11, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Also requesting that the fix for issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
gets integrated into AOO 3.4.1.
The fix is only a one-liner. Seems to be of low-risk, but I do not know its
side-effects. Are there more information
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Grignon
kevingrignon...@gmail.comwrote:
Don,
I've added some content to the planning doc on the cwiki.
Question: is the conference focused on opensource methods and process, or
on the actual products, or both?
To be honest, it is our to make it be
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:47:00 -0400
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I took all the tweets from June that mentioned 'OpenOffice' and then
removed the word 'OpenOffice' as well as the string 'RT/. (If they
were left in
Hi Andre,
Fixed.
still buggy: scp2\source\ooo\makefile.mk uses SYSTEM_APR_UTIL while
setsoenv.in uses SYSTEM_APRUTIL.
--
Bye,
Yuri Dario
/*
* OS/2 open source software
* http://web.os2power.com/yuri
* http://www.netlabs.org
*/
On 6/27/12 3:44 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 15:11, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Also requesting that the fix for issue
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119987
gets integrated into AOO 3.4.1.
The fix is only a one-liner. Seems to be of low-risk, but I do not
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 7:05 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 18:08 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
Maybe beveled edges or something would make it look more button-like
so it was clearer that the user is supposed to click it?
Maybe - here it is with text a little
KG01 - See comments inline
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Grignon
kevingrignon...@gmail.comwrote:
Don,
I've added some content to the planning doc on the cwiki.
Question: is the conference focused
On 27 June 2012 14:50, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Grignon
kevingrignon...@gmail.comwrote:
Don,
I've added some content to the planning doc on the cwiki.
Question: is the conference focused on opensource methods and process, or
on
Hi Ariel,
and the bug should be fixed with revision 1354260. Verify by opening the
ok, this is fixed now, thanks.
I cannot reproduce the missing resource here, nor can find something
wrong in the source code. Try setting a conditional break point in
dp_misc::getResourceString for id==3005,
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 15:20 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM, drew jensen
drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use
as
hi,
I am Vasavi and I completed my Masters in Computer application and
currently doing Masters in Networking and System administration , I am very
much intrested in opensource technologies and currently I want to work on
help wanted for any documentation as I know its importance as a sytem
A really quick study based on number of post on the EN forums that
shows, IMO, some interesting information.
Fist the numbers, then some analysis on those numbers. Note, long
post below...
Number of Topics: T
Number of Posts: P
Ratio Posts/Topics: R
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
A really quick study based on number of post on the EN forums that
shows, IMO, some interesting information.
Fist the numbers, then some analysis on those numbers. Note, long
post below...
http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
this project moved to Apache in June 2011. The only thing I removed
was Re:, since that would have dominated the cloud and is machine,
not user written
In this particular
2012/6/27 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
What time period are these counts for? All time?
All time. Those numbers are a sort of snapshot of today situation.
Some quick observations:
- The most used forums are Writer, then Setup and Troubleshooting,
then Calc, then a big gap, then the rest
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
this project moved to Apache in June 2011. The only thing I removed
was Re:, since that would have
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
this project moved to Apache
Top posting as a comment on the entire post, and what it is and what it isn't.
In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2], a
LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some erroneous
statements regarding Apache OpenOffice and Symphony:
[W]e are looking forward the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Top posting as a comment on the entire post, and what it is and what it
isn't.
In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2], a
LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some erroneous
statements
--- Mer 27/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Top posting as a comment on the
entire post, and what it is and what it isn't.
In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2],
a LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some
erroneous statements regarding
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
It's really disappointing to see uninformed people give
opinions about things they evidently don't understand.
I can't resist :-)
http://xkcd.com/386/
- Sam Ruby
Now I've got Bobby Weir singing One More Saturday Night in my head.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 27, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
It's really disappointing to see uninformed people give
opinions
+1
With the the auto mail roll out, everyone will be able to commentate on the
bug. and we wont miss any defect which requested as release blocker.
2012/6/27 Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org
With the new round of hand-written request-for-blocker-flag mails I'd like
to reintroduce the automatism I
+1
Crash issue should be treat as release blocker. And it's not regression
issue, it's also can be reproduced against OO3.3
2012/6/27 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
On 6/27/12 3:44 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 27.06.2012 15:11, Herbert Duerr wrote:
Also
Hi, See my answer below in blue
2012/6/27 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 13:58, chengjh wrote:
This is the I implementation of the proposal described in thread
Propose
to Implement the Loading
Hello All,
Sorry for top post.
Where are we at? Have we summarized the discussion? Have all expressed
their views?
How might we crystallized our position and move forward?
Regards,
Kevin
On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Rob Weir wrote:
Top posting as a comment on the entire post, and what it
Hey Vasavi,
Thanks for your offer of support.
There are many high value project documentation tasks which could use your
support.
For example, AOO user experience is looking to document the key usage
scenarios.
A collection of key usage scenarios are key inputs to downstream activities
Hi Kevin;
--- Mer 27/6/12, Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hello All,
Sorry for top post.
Where are we at? Have we summarized the discussion? Have all
expressed their views?
How might we crystallized our position and move forward?
There is indeed a big problem.
Add a new patch per Rob's information to replace the old one, please review.
Just changed the Attributes for font files in the component table
to msidbComponentAttributesSharedDllRefCount, the font will be deinstallled
when the ref count of the files down to 0, so other apps can use those
fonts
Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
If we saved with our format(.ods)
Failed to saved with password, the failed message in dialog is General Error:
Generral input/output error, also failed open the password protect .ods file,
it pop up password incorrect dialog but i input correct password.
Not the updated patch is already uploaded into bugzilla. For you review.
thanks.
2012/6/28 Fan Zheng zheng.easy...@gmail.com
Hi, See my answer below in blue
2012/6/27 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
On 14.06.2012 14:11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On
Hi,
Since we have weekly AOO branch build and daily trunk build, I want to do
build verification test to make sure the main functions are OK. After this
test we can do further general function test.
I noticed there is smoketest in the AOO which can do some verification
test. But it is based on
The error message General Error: Generral input/output error looks so
farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside, such
dialog will show up.
2012/6/28 YangTerry polo8...@hotmail.com
Verify not fixed on trunk r1354384.
If we saved with our format(.ods)
Failed to
And I my local, (WinXP env), seems such issues can not be reproduced.
2012/6/28 Fan Zheng zheng.easy...@gmail.com
The error message General Error: Generral input/output error looks so
farmilliar... I remember that in the build without moz package inside, such
dialog will show up.
I can saved .ods file without password successfully, also can save .xls
successfully.
Only when i saved our format (like .ods) file with password, this error pop up.
Also failed to open our format file with password.
So it should not be related with build without moz package.
Date: Thu,
71 matches
Mail list logo
