Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-28 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/2/23 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 2/24/12 1:03 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi *, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: Now where we have the neon replacement in place

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-24 Thread Kay Schenk
2012/2/23 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 2/24/12 1:03 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi *, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: Now where we have the neon replacement in place we should try to bring up a working online update service. I think it

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 1/27/12 8:06 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Jürgen, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Unfortunately I cannot test how this is implemented because the feature depends on functionality removed in the IP clearance (libneon), and I don't have a

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Kay Schenk
2012/2/23 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 1/27/12 8:06 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Jürgen, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Unfortunately I cannot test how this is implemented because the feature depends on functionality removed in the

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Dave Fisher
On Feb 23, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: 2012/2/23 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 1/27/12 8:06 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Jürgen, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Unfortunately I cannot test how this is implemented because

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi *, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: Now where we have the neon replacement in place we should try to bring up a working online update service. I think it would be very useful for our upcoming release to promote it to our users. A basic version should be

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:59:46PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 1/27/12 8:06 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Jürgen, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Unfortunately I cannot test how this is implemented because the feature depends on functionality

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 2/24/12 1:03 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi *, On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: Now where we have the neon replacement in place we should try to bring up a working online update service. I think it would be very useful for our upcoming release to promote it

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-02-23 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 2/24/12 6:08 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:59:46PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 1/27/12 8:06 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Jürgen, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Unfortunately I cannot test how this is implemented

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-28 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 27/01/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: this is actually implemented. Nice to know! I updated http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Update_Notification_Protocol with this remark. a dummy http://people.apache.org/~arielch/ProductUpdateService/check.Update will indicate every OOo version

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-27 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org: Hi Andrea, Regina, *, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 27/01/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: the information must be out there, we just have to research, and study the code.

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-26 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 1/25/12 9:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: The code is in main/extensions/source/update/ rather illuminating main/extensions/source/update/check/updateprotocol.cxx The format is xml, you can see

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-26 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:10 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: On 1/25/2012 19:18, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.orgwrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: The code is in main/extensions/source/update/

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-26 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jan 26, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:10 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: On 1/25/2012 19:18, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.orgwrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-26 Thread Joe Schaefer
Sorry about the buildbot error Dave, should be fixed now. (Problem with a filename having a space in it). - Original Message - From: Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [CODE] update services

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-26 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Kay, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:18:39PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: Well -- a very short update on this. And thanks again to Regina for helping to point me in the right direction. Basically, unless we can find the former check.Update script somewhere we may be out of luck. So, if anyone

[CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Kay Schenk
Hello folks -- I note by our migration page -- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OpenOffice.org+Migration+Status that as of 10/24/2011 we have NO decision on where to locate the update service -- Product Update Service (PUS). This referenced URL

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: Hello folks -- I note by our migration page -- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OpenOffice.org+Migration+Status that as of 10/24/2011 we have NO decision on where to locate the update service --

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, I'm no developer, but this are my notices and might help in further investigation: Kay Schenk schrieb: Hello folks -- I note by our migration page -- https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OpenOffice.org+Migration+Status that as of 10/24/2011 we have NO decision on where

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Regina Henschel
Regina Henschel schrieb: [..] This URL comes from the file version.ini in the folder program in the installation folder. In the code the URL is in /main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst Kind regards Regina

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:52:18PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote: A few weeks ago I tried the lazy man's approach: -- added an entry to my hosts file to direct update36.services.openoffice.org to a local HTTP server, just so the host could be resolved. no luck. -- tried responding with an

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: The code is in main/extensions/source/update/ rather illuminating main/extensions/source/update/check/updateprotocol.cxx The format is xml, you can see main/instsetoo_native/util/update.xml it seems to support also an

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread Kay Schenk
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.orgwrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: The code is in main/extensions/source/update/ rather illuminating main/extensions/source/update/check/updateprotocol.cxx The format is

Re: [CODE] update services

2012-01-25 Thread TJ Frazier
On 1/25/2012 19:18, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.orgwrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: The code is in main/extensions/source/update/ rather illuminating