Am 08/31/2012 10:48 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
[...]
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 support Java 7, which is the
recommended configuration; but (especially on 64-bit Windows) you might
receive warnings about the Java version being defective. In that case,
download and
Am 01.09.2012 01:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
Marcus, I think the changes you recommended are fine. As for me, I don't
know tests Andreas are running, but I'm on java 7, 1.7.0_04, and
really no issues with anything I've done.
We need more enlightenment on this, but your changes should suffice.
OK,
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 01.09.2012 01:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
Marcus, I think the changes you recommended are fine. As for me, I don't
know tests Andreas are running, but I'm on java 7, 1.7.0_04, and
really no issues with anything I've
Hi Andres,
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 03:27:56PM +0200, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 01.09.2012 01:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
Marcus, I think the changes you recommended are fine. As for me, I don't
know tests Andreas are running, but I'm on java 7, 1.7.0_04, and
really no issues with anything I've
Am 01.09.2012 19:05, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Andres,
OK, once more:
Yes, please. It has been some misunderstanding. If I understood clearly,
there are two bugs:
1) Java 7 not recognized
2) Java versions recognized but being suboptimal with Base + JDBC
(1) happens only on Windows,
Am 31.08.2012 00:01, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/30/2012 09:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger wrote:
Then extract some old version of Java6 (= revision 23), point the
office to it and try again. It's many times faster.
So, to recap: the best version of Java we could
Am 08/31/2012 11:58 AM, schrieb Andreas Säger:
Am 31.08.2012 00:01, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/30/2012 09:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger wrote:
Then extract some old version of Java6 (= revision 23), point the
office to it and try again. It's many times faster.
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
[...]
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 support Java 7, which is the
recommended configuration; but (especially on 64-bit Windows) you might
receive warnings about the Java version being defective. In that case,
download and install [the most current JRE 6 version | link].
Dňa Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:39:13 +0200 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
napísal:
Am 08/31/2012 11:58 AM, schrieb Andreas Säger:
Am 31.08.2012 00:01, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/30/2012 09:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger wrote:
Then extract some old version of Java6
Am 08/31/2012 10:55 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:
Dňa Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:39:13 +0200 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
napísal:
Am 08/31/2012 11:58 AM, schrieb Andreas Säger:
Am 31.08.2012 00:01, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/30/2012 09:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger
On 08/31/2012 02:16 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/31/2012 10:55 PM, schrieb Michal Hriň:
Dňa Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:39:13 +0200 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
napísal:
Am 08/31/2012 11:58 AM, schrieb Andreas Säger:
Am 31.08.2012 00:01, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/30/2012 09:09 AM, schrieb
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger wrote:
Then extract some old version of Java6 (= revision 23), point the
office to it and try again. It's many times faster.
So, to recap: the best version of Java we could mention as a workaround
(after saying that Java 7 is supported and more secure, of course)
Am 08/30/2012 09:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger wrote:
Then extract some old version of Java6 (= revision 23), point the
office to it and try again. It's many times faster.
So, to recap: the best version of Java we could mention as a workaround
(after saying that
I found this commit from Marcus, from a few days ago:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:17:10 2012
New Revision: 1377138
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1377138view=rev
Log:
#i120681# Updated the link to JRE 6 to point to the lastest build instead of a
fixed version.
Now, the idea of
Hi Andrea, *
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:38:48PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I found this commit from Marcus, from a few days ago:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:17:10 2012
New Revision: 1377138
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1377138view=rev
Log:
#i120681# Updated the link to
Am 08/29/2012 06:48 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hi Andrea, *
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:38:48PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I found this commit from Marcus, from a few days ago:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:17:10 2012
New Revision: 1377138
URL:
On Aug 29, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/29/2012 06:48 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Hi Andrea, *
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:38:48PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I found this commit from Marcus, from a few days ago:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:17:10 2012
Am 29.08.2012 22:28, Dave Fisher wrote:
@Andreas:
Is that true, is there really a hard dependency for a specific JRE version?
And if this is so then we should understand why.
Regards,
Dave
Just open a small Base file with an embedded HSQLDB on Linux x86(32bit).
18 matches
Mail list logo
