Hi,
I am supporting this proposed change of our current Linux buildbot.
May be this buildbot could also produce more than one language.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 02.01.2012 21:46, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi there,
now the buildboot's builds are configured with the following switches:
On 12/31/11 8:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:43 AM, TJ Fraziertjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On 12/29/2011 18:26, kay.schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:45 AM, TJ Fraziertjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On
On 1/2/12 9:57 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:32:10AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Normally the office would come via the distro and would have been build for
the distro
On 1/2/12 9:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi there,
now the buildboot's builds are configured with the following switches:
--with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
--with-system-python
--enable-verbose
--with-package-format=deb
--with-build-version=2012-01-02
IMO those switches have the
Please include me on your new member list.
Having problems with current version. Opens with messge saying waiting for
file rebuild. Nothing happens. cannot delete and have to restart.
Would like to replace with new 2012 version. How do I download it? Assume
saved files will still be
2012/1/3 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On 1/2/12 9:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi there,
now the buildboot's builds are configured with the following switches:
--with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
--with-system-python
--enable-verbose
--with-package-format=deb
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:37:33AM +0100, eric b wrote:
Hi Ariel,
Le 3 janv. 12 à 01:44, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit :
* including the Solaris and Mac OS X packages in the download
tables on that page would be rather confusing, because all my
builds are Developer
Snapshots
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 07:38:40AM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
Maybe we should have a second configuration without any switches and running
the RAT scans and produce our source releases which we have to provide.
+1
You make an important point. Unlike legacy OOo project, AOO needs to
Hi Ariel,
Le 3 janv. 12 à 14:20, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit :
Hi Eric,
I'm not sure to understand what you mean here.
older = according to the time stamp, they were uploaded 15-Dec-2011.
Yes, I know, but you can believe me, the SVG thing is inside (and
works well)
Solaris builds
On 03/01/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
you have to add localized builds, as Oliver pointed out.
Localized builds everyday will be an overhead for the build boots, for
example, my build on 6 cores computer takes less than 1:30 hr with no
languages, and circa 3 hrs with en-US, de, es, fr, it,
Hi,
On 03.01.2012 14:41, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 07:38:40AM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
Maybe we should have a second configuration without any switches and running
the RAT scans and produce our source releases which we have to provide.
+1
You make an important
As the community know Gav, in his role at infrastructure@ has
undertaken to stabilise and migrate the AOO extensions code to ASF
infrastructure. His work has been progressing and he remains committed
to completing this.
However, as some know Sourceforge made an offer to help via our
private list.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
As the community know Gav, in his role at infrastructure@ has
undertaken to stabilise and migrate the AOO extensions code to ASF
infrastructure. His work has been progressing and he remains committed
to completing
On 3 January 2012 16:25, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
As the community know Gav, in his role at infrastructure@ has
undertaken to stabilise and migrate the AOO extensions code to ASF
infrastructure. His work
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Kay,
Good catch here. There are images with /contributing/_media/*.png urls to
move out of that tree now. Done in r1226617.
OK--I'll take a look at this today and see what needs to be done.
And, Joe, thanks for the
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Site builds now take under 8 minutes to complete.
The buildbot checkin will still take at least as long
for significant modifications, but the build script
(build_site.pl) is tailored for ooo-site to run
over 2x
2011/9/30 Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org
Hi,
for removing category X excluded licenses from Apache OpenOffice I
replaced the formerly used LGPL licensed module i18nregexp with the regular
expression engine of module ICU which is already widely use in OpenOffice.
The replacement fixes a lot
On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Kay,
Good catch here. There are images with /contributing/_media/*.png urls to
move out of that tree now. Done in r1226617.
OK--I'll take a look at this today
Hi Joe,
Thanks. I'm glad to see sed go away. I was going to ask you about a better way
to this.
-$args{header} = `sed -n '/head/,/\\/head/p' ${file} | sed -e
'1s/.*head//' -e 's/\\/head.*//'`;
-$args{content} = `sed -n '/body.*/,/\\/body/p' ${file} | sed -e
'1s/.*body.*//' -e
A month ago Drew sent a logo proposal to the ooo-marketing list. It
has been discussed and iterated on that list. The current state of
the proposal is on the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal
Personally I think this is fine work, and since we've
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal
Personally I think this is fine work, and since we've received no
counter-proposals in the last month, we should go ahead and update the
There is a TM in the image. Does Apache own the trademark OpenOffice or Apache
+1
To be clear, I assume the discussion is about the single logo that is at the
top of the page (Example column) and made available in two download formats
(Logo-AOO-dj.tar.bz2 and Logo-AOO-dj.zip).
I also assume that it is the essential design that is being approved. There is
need for
2012/1/3 Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal
Personally I think this is fine work, and since we've received no
counter-proposals in the last month, we should go ahead and update the
There is a TM in the image. Does Apache own the
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
+1
To be clear, I assume the discussion is about the single logo that is at the
top of the page (Example column) and made available in two download formats
(Logo-AOO-dj.tar.bz2 and Logo-AOO-dj.zip).
I also
we would use (TM). At some point, say after we actually have a
release, then we could ask Apache to pursue registration for Apache
OpenOffice
Why would we do so if we know that Sun/Oracle could not get it registered (and
thus have chosen OpenOffice.org instead)?
--
Pavel Janík
2012/1/3 Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz:
we would use (TM). At some point, say after we actually have a
release, then we could ask Apache to pursue registration for Apache
OpenOffice
Why would we do so if we know that Sun/Oracle could not get it registered
(and thus have chosen OpenOffice.org
Hi Rob;
JIC someone with a lot of spare time gives a try
on this logo thing ... I have some questions.
What would be the implications (if any) of using
a legally licensed commercial font?
Ariel pointed to some nice splash screens done
previously in the Wiki, can those be (re)used
as a starting
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A month ago Drew sent a logo proposal to the ooo-marketing list. It
has been discussed and iterated on that list. The current state of
the proposal is on the wiki:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Hi Kay,
Good catch here. There are images with /contributing/_media/*.png urls
to
move
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Jan 3, 2012 8:59 PM, Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal
Personally I think this is fine work, and since we've received no
counter-proposals in the last
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.orgwrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:41:35PM +0100, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi Dave
Just to clarify. Mechtilde is a contributor since day 0 - 7 years.
She is one of the moast experienced QA here, and a verry skilled
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
HI -
The API section www.openoffice.org/api/ now has leftnav elements from
templates/api/leftnav.mdtext
Skeleton.html worked with this formulation:
{% if leftnav.content %}div id=leftnav{% block leftnav %}{{
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, we got to see the new logo and a bit of a discussion has ensued re the
now Apache hosted http://www.openoffice.org/ and the existing logo on that
site.
My question concerns the extent of future rebranding.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, we got to see the new logo and a bit of a discussion has ensued re the
now Apache hosted
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 11:13:20 Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Jan 3, 2012 8:59 PM, Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOOLogo+proposal
Personally I think this is fine work,
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, we got to see the new logo and a bit of a discussion
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 11:13:20 Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Jan 3, 2012 8:59 PM, Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz wrote:
Hi Don,
Hope you had a relaxing xmas break!
Am 23.12.11 02:44, schrieb Donald Harbison:
This seems like a much more constructive thread.
FWIW, I know the guys at Team OO, well, at least since I first met them in
2005 at OpenOffice.org Conference in Koper, Slovenia. There is passion and
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 13:18:51 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 11:13:20 Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Jan 3, 2012 8:59 PM, Pavel Janík
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 13:18:51 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 11:13:20 Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please
2012/1/3 Götz Wohlberg goetz.wohlb...@googlemail.com:
Hi Don,
Hope you had a relaxing xmas break!
Am 23.12.11 02:44, schrieb Donald Harbison:
This seems like a much more constructive thread.
FWIW, I know the guys at Team OO, well, at least since I first met them in
2005 at OpenOffice.org
Let's take this knot apart and work it more systematically.
1. I think there is alignment on what the logo is for Apache OpenOffice
(incubating), in terms of text with gulls. That takes care of the one main
logo.
2. With regard to branding on the web properties, and the references to Apache
--- Mar 3/1/12, Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
Sorry, the question specified two trade marks, neither of
which was
OpenOffice.org. Now we know we have the
OpenOffice.org gifted from Oracle,
but OpenOffice is a different brand all together. I
just wanted to clarify,
--- Mar 3/1/12, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
OK, we got to see the new logo and a
bit of a discussion has ensued re the
now Apache hosted http://www.openoffice.org/ and the
existing logo on that
site.
My question concerns the extent of future rebranding.
yes, it's
45 matches
Mail list logo
