Mirror operator contact email ( was: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution)

2012-03-24 Thread drew
Howdy, NOTE - added infra ML on CC. Alright, a copy of the draft mail message (see below) was sent to each of the contact addresses for the 98 mirrors listed at http://www.openoffice.org/distribution/mirrors/ with the subject line of: 'OpenOffice.org to Apache OpenOffice mirror system

Draft of mirror operator contact email ( was: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution)

2012-03-23 Thread drew
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:52 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: snip I still would like to strongly suggest that someone on the PPMC step up NOW and offer to contact existing mirror operators to get them to cover some of our losses. Howdy all, Please take a moment to review the draft of a

Re: Draft of mirror operator contact email ( was: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution)

2012-03-23 Thread Joe Schaefer
Lgtm Sent from my iPhone On Mar 23, 2012, at 1:47 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:52 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: snip I still would like to strongly suggest that someone on the PPMC step up NOW and offer to contact existing mirror operators to get them to

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-22 Thread Mark Ramm
*We have finally assessed the capacity and capabilities needed to serve the surge of Apache OpenOffice 3.4 release-time traffic. Before we could commit to delivering the full download volume, we wanted to produce a vetted plan, including a clear timeline and backing technical implementation

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Mark Ramm
And finally: would you have any objection to us using a mix of fixed mirrors, elastic file delivery services (like s3), and commercial CDN service to handle spikes in download gracefully and assure that global users get good download performance when local mirrors are overloaded or not

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread drew
: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution Please correct me if I'm wrong. But I thought that the Apache mirrors have more bandwidth than the SourceForge mirrors. Could someone explain why do we put the default download to places with less bandwidth? Apache mirrors: http

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Joe Schaefer
existing mirror operators to get them to cover some of our losses. From: drew d...@baseanswers.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:45 AM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:45 -0400

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Mer 21/3/12, Joe Schaefer ha scritto: ... Right now the ASF has roughly 250 mirrors, of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if we start carrying AOO releases.  That means we'd have about twice as many mirrors as the mirrorbrain OOo service has, so we should be in better shape

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread drew
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:52 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: Right now the ASF has roughly 250 mirrors, of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if we start carrying AOO releases. That means we'd have about twice as many mirrors as the mirrorbrain OOo service has, so we should be in better

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Joe Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:31 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution --- Mer 21/3/12, Joe Schaefer ha scritto: ... Right now the ASF has roughly 250 mirrors, of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if we start carrying AOO releases.  That means

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Joe Schaefer
Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:52 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: Right now the ASF has roughly 250 mirrors, of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if we start carrying AOO releases.  That means we'd have about twice as many mirrors as the mirrorbrain

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Rob Weir
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:45 AM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:45 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: We're still exploring available options

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread drew
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:32 -0400, drew wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08:52 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: Right now the ASF has roughly 250 mirrors, of which atm I'd expect 50 or so to drop us if we start carrying AOO releases. That means we'd have about twice as many mirrors as the

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-21 Thread Joe Schaefer
Hah, I missed it as well ;-) From: drew d...@baseanswers.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:11 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:32 -0400, drew wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 08

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-20 Thread Mark Ramm
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: FWIW the ballpark figures we have today Roberto are roughly 12GB worth of release artifacts and about100TB / day worth of download traffic. Thanks for the information. I'm working with Roberto to make sure all the

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-20 Thread Joe Schaefer
From: Mark Ramm m...@geek.net To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:25 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-20 Thread Dave Fisher
: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: FWIW the ballpark figures we have today Roberto are roughly 12GB worth of release artifacts and about100TB / day worth of download traffic. Thanks for the information. I'm working

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-20 Thread imacat
...@opendirective.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:25 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: FWIW the ballpark figures we have today Roberto are roughly 12GB worth of release artifacts

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-20 Thread Joe Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:25 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: FWIW the ballpark figures we have today Roberto

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-20 Thread Marcus (OOo)
, 2012 2:25 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: FWIW the ballpark figures we have today Roberto are roughly 12GB worth of release artifacts and about100TB / day worth of download traffic. Thanks

Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Ross Gardler
I just had a call with Roberto from SourceForge in which he updated me on what they've done with the templates and extensions sites. I asked Roberto to send a summary to this list, but I just wanted to extend my thanks to him and the team at SourceForge, along with the people here in AOO and ASF

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/19 23:03, Ross Gardler said: - what are the likely bandwidth requirements when the release goes out? - does ASF Infra feel confident the existing mirror network will support this? - can SF become a part of that mirror network in a sensible way? - note that SF does not provide

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message - From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 11:03 AM Subject: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution I just had a call with Roberto from SourceForge in which he updated me on what they've done

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I just had a call with Roberto from SourceForge in which he updated me on what they've done with the templates and extensions sites. I asked Roberto to send a summary to this list, but I just wanted to extend my

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi Ross, On 3/19/12 4:03 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: I just had a call with Roberto from SourceForge in which he updated me on what they've done with the templates and extensions sites. I asked Roberto to send a summary to this list, but I just wanted to extend my thanks to him and the team at

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1... I trust Joe's PoV here implicitly. On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Given the initial feedback Jurgen provided on the infra lists about the potential number of downloads a day and expected size of each download, I think it would be prudent to take advantage of any

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Ross Gardler
- From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 11:23 AM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution - Original Message - From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Joe Schaefer
3:54 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution OK, Roberto is on this list, so let's see what can be worked out. My exploratory discussions with Roberto indicated that SF are willing to work with us on a decent solution. Joe can I assume you are happy to represent ASF infra here

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Joe Schaefer
ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 3:55 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution Let's leave the conversation off the infra lists so Roberto can see them all.  I'm happy to represent infra here. From: Ross Gardler rgard

Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution

2012-03-19 Thread Dave Fisher
. From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 3:54 PM Subject: Re: Sourceforge and AOO 3.4 distribution OK, Roberto is on this list, so let's see what