David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
...we are responsible for ensuring that it does not fall into the wrong
hands (a banned country).
What stops anyone from downloading pretty much any code they want to use, in
the UK or USA or wherever, then putting it on a USB stick and sending it
Does anyone else find the new messages unwieldy compared with the old-style
ones?
With what we had before, since most types of post contained the whole
history of a thread up to that point, I merely made sure I only had the most
recent post for each thread.
But now, each thread seems to have a
There's been a long thread in comp.lang.rexx in the last few days from
someone trying to get external functions to work on an Ubuntu system.
This was ooREXX 4.1.2
The user's problem turned out to be due to him making function calls with
unquoted function names, which were folded to uppercase by
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
This is working correctly. The function name uses normal Rexx rules for
name resolution. If the call name is coded as a symbol, then the name
being called is ALWAYS the uppercase version, since all symbols have as an
eventual value the uppercase value
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Because it IS part of the search order. But that really only applies to
the searches using file extensions. This is not done with the raw name
because it resulted in too many false positives with non-rexx programs
(this was actually added at one
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I just discovered there have been multiple tracker items created over the
last couple of days, but I never got tracker notifications for these. Are
others seeing these notifications?
No; I think I've seen one commit msg in the last two days and nothing
Is there a reason why most (all?) of the commit emails I've received until
today had subjects like:
Subject: [oorexx:code-0] miesfeld committed to Open Object Rexx
Code SVN Repository: Publican ooDialog - work on links
but I've just received a couple with subjects like:
Subject:
David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not 100% sure, but I believe it has to do with elements that will not
completely fit on a page. For instance, an ordered list or a paragraph. I
think it is warning that it had to break the element and continue it to
the next page.
If all the
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
These are fundamentally different constructs. Do Over actually requests a
new version from the collection which is defined as being non-sparse. The
sort is an in-place modification of the array itself.
REXX used to have a principle of least
Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
Yesterday I stumbled over a surprising behaviour of Array's sort, which
led me to open a bug report https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1107/.
Obviously the sorting is working as designed, hence the reported behaviour
was not accepted as
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, hakan
hexi...@users.sourceforge.netwrote:
I think it's not consistent with
Do s over array
say s
end
These are fundamentally different constructs. Do Over actually requests a
new version from the collection which
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
This is fairly simple to implement for the equals/not equals variants. The
real open question is how to handle the other comparisons such as , ,
etc. These are probably VERY rare situations, but the behavior still needs
to be defined. I see three
Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
If you go to: https://sourceforge.net/auth/prefs/, you should find a
drop-down box at the bottom, where you can choose Plain Text (other
options: HTML, Combined) and pressing the button entitled Save
Changes.
Thank-you! Unfortunately I
The old emails I got when people updated bugs etc didn't have unnecessary
html parts in them, but I see the new ones do. Does anyone know if there's
a way to turn them off, either globally or at a user-level?
--
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed that bug because the original submitter of the bug refused to
provide a test case that demonstrated the bug. So, I had to build my own
test case, and my test case worked fine.
There was nothing in the original report that suggested a problem
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
There was nothing in the original report that suggested a problem with a
MIME message, though.
But he did. He said: Try changing the message text
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm in total agreement with Jerry on this one. This is an area I have a
little bit of expertise, having written the Apache javamail
implementation.
Okay, I'll go back and look
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Not going to work. The new tracker system forwards the emails using the
email address of the sender, so we run into all sorts of permission
problems with setting that up.
And items now don't have a copy of a whole discussion in them? So we have
to get
Well: this is a test line.
I wonder if this message will get sent? I certainly expect it to. In this
bug report Mark recently said:
More simply put, because of the definition of header fields, an email
message body can not begin with a word ending in a colon because a line
beginning
David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
The document looks outstanding!
It's certainly polished, in places. I just looked at some pages at random
though and found one problem, where the shaded box around a syntax diagram
straddles a page break - for 5.18 SockRecv at the foot of page 24.
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be doable, but the question is what is the option to do? I don't
know, it would take someone smarter than me to figure out what the option
does.
It's hard to make an intelligent response to this, as I don't know the
internals of ooRexx... but
In one of the support requests on the tracker:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=684731aid=3516270group_id=119701
there's a long running problem with SysFileTree described, raised by Jerry
Senowitz (jlsen). I recently commented:
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I didn't mean to make you unhappy. If it's a slight
consolation, I consider anything more than a few words in either the
forums or the support requests a long debate. ;-)
Ah, ok.
What do the developers do to create a trace for themselves?
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just saying I think its place is in the application, or a higher level
class that uses .ooSQLite.
I think the same.
Not sure if you know that you could use this syntax in ooRexx, or that you
would like it:
stmt ||= encapsulate(col1) || ,
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
And indeed, you could also just change the name of the file used for
::requires and keep the names the same. That would allow for a pretty
seamless upgrade path and it would still coexist with other programs that
used a different version.
I realise
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an outline of the classes:
* In SQLite, 95% of what any one would use are is done though APIs that
either require a database connection or require a prepared statement. So
the 2 main objects in ooSQLite are:
Database connection:
::class
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
If the ooSQLite package gets included in the ooRexx distribution then an
application written that uses ooSQLite will run on any system where the
user of the application has ooRexx installed. And the user will not have
to install anything else.
But
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Do you have a mechanism in mind to allow future versions of ooSQLLite to
use V4/5/6... structs and APIs? How would a programmer dictate which
set
Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
Having subscribed the bug-tracking-list I wonder, why this post was not
sent by Sourceforge, hence the question, whether anyone has received that
mail? (Subject: Algorithm for changestr does not mention the optional
count, author:
hakan hexi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
No offense, but...
and none taken.
Isn't it great that someone take their time to implement the interface to
SQLite when oneself is not talent/or lack the knowledge how to do it !.
Yes, absolutely.
If SQLite will evolve and that is delayed/not
30 matches
Mail list logo
