Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
, the generated make files, etc., so that a user of that could just do make. Maybe we need 3 source packages? The pure source tree in tar format, the pure source tree in zip format for Windows, and the distribution tar file? -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
and do another release build? Or ... ? -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Next step(s) for 4.0 release?

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Rick McGuireobject.r...@gmail.com wrote: The memory leak issue I fixed was also more significant that I would have liked.  I suspect it is time for an RC3 release.  We've also suddenly picked up some new people who've been kicking the tires

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running rxapi as a non root user on Linux

2009-07-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rexx, can that user talk to the socket owned by the miesfeld process? I actually don't have any idea, but it seems like it could cause a conflict? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running rxapi as a non root user on Linux

2009-07-15 Thread Mark Miesfeld
or 2 infinite loops that way. But that is outside of the test suite. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors

[Oorexx-devel] 2821033 Incompatible event semaphore function results

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
functions. Then a null handle would be 0 in the Rexx code. It still leaves the problem of the functions that were documented as returning the empty string. Or, I could do the same as I did in ooDialog, test for null and return 0 or the empty string as appropriate. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] 2821033 Incompatible event semaphore function results

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Okay, I'll assign this to myself and do the work, if you haven't already started? -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Rick McGuireobject.r...@gmail.com wrote: I think this just needs to be the latter, which is fairly trivial to implement.  The Windows versions

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Running rxapi as a non root user on Linux

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
it. grin -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Rick McGuireobject.r...@gmail.com wrote: How about a compromise?  We make the code changes to enable rxapi to run as a normal process, but keep the install procedures the same for now.  The code is already in place to auto-launch rxapi

Re: [Oorexx-devel] 4918 fails to build on MacOSX

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Well, it looks like Rick already fixed it. -- Mark Miesfeld On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Mark Miesfeldmiesf...@gmail.com wrote: This is my fault.  I was just going to boot up a Linux to make sure the last change I did works on Linux. Give me a little time René, I'm doing 3 things at once

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Only root can allow ooRexx to run on Linux ? (Re: Fwd: [ oorexx-Bugs-2796185 ] REX121: Storage for data queues is exhausted (on MacOSX)

2009-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
is in place. Or, the owner of the computer will not give you permission. In which case, ethically and morally you shouldn't install the software to begin with. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:46 AM, David Ashleydavid.ashley@gmail.com wrote: All - Having rxapi run as a system daemon

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Only root can allow ooRexx to run on Linux ? (Re: Fwd: [ oorexx-Bugs-2796185 ] REX121: Storage for data queues is exhausted (on MacOSX)

2009-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. If you don't own the machine, and the entity that does own the machine say no, you can't install ooRexx, then I think that, ethically, you shouldn't install ooRexx on the machine. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 Release Candidate Two Now Available

2009-07-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
The ooRexx Team decided we needed to do a second release candidate due to some fixes for a memory and handle leak. This second release candidate is now available on SourceForge: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119701 Windows and Linux builds are uploaded. AIX and s390x

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Optimizer problem with Fedora 11

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
working with. --- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ok for this doc update about ::routine ?

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
as keyword in and of itself, are subtle when your first read through the docs. Once it's pointed out to you though, it will probably stick. grin There is a lot of stuff I don't understand about Rexx itself, it's a good thing there are people around to point things out to me. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Release Candidate II

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. Otherwise I'll rebuild everything and post it tomorrow evening. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build Machine Back

2009-07-10 Thread Mark Miesfeld
everywhere. I can't reach it from California. I noticed it about a week ago. Then when you said you were doing some work on it, I decided to wait to bring it up. I just tried a couple of times with no luck. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Optimizer problem with Fedora 11

2009-07-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
files is skipped. ? (not 100% sure of that.) I'll take a look the next time I'm on Linux, David might beat me to it. grin -- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up

[Oorexx-devel] About bug: 1111900 Wrong result from FORMAT bif

2009-07-07 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, Could you help me with this bug. I'd really like to resolve it one way or another as it is the oldest open bug. But, every time I read I don't even understand it. grin The doc says about format(): The number is first rounded according to standard Rexx rules, as though the operation

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [ oorexx-Bugs-2817468 ] Memory leaks when calling rexx from a c++ DLL

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
already detected the leak, they might not help. -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [ oorexx-Bugs-2817468 ] Memory leaks when calling rexx from a c++ DLL

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
and include files to. If it looks helpful to you, you might be able to figure out what to do faster than I will. I'll continue to work on it though. -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [ oorexx-Bugs-2817468 ] Memory leaks when calling rexx from a c++ DLL

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
pushed send, I saw this link more specific to VS 2005 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e5ewb1h3(VS.80).aspx -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [ oorexx-Bugs-2817468 ] Memory leaks when calling rexx from a c++ DLL

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the variable 'strParam' was corrupted. I ran it twice and got the same thing. -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [ oorexx-Bugs-2817468 ] Memory leaks when calling rexx from a c++ DLL

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
at this point without memory use getting any higher. -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [ oorexx-Bugs-2817468 ] Memory leaks when calling rexx from a c++ DLL

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
program go over 24 MB, before I switched over to use the debug libraries. I'll run the non-debug version over-night, but I think it will just confirm there is not a leak. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Away for a a long weekend.

2009-07-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Have fun. If you have a lot of fun, just stay an extra week. grin -- Mark Miesfeld On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Rick McGuireobject.r...@gmail.com wrote: I'm going to be seriously off the net until sometime Sunday, so don't be too worried if I'm suddenly unresponsive. Rick

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release canidate ?

2009-07-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. It won't necessarily show that there isn't a bug, but it might narrow things down a little. -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Release canidate ?

2009-07-01 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to it. As for the rest, at a quick glance it seems to me a lot of them are tests that write out files to the operating system. Could there be a problem with permissions? I didn't take a very close look, let me study it some more. -- Mark Miesfeld On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, David Ashleydavid.ashley

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Thinking about the next release.

2009-06-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
: replace all the usages of handles with .Pointer and re-architect the Windows message handling so that the programmer can reply directly to the event messages, add in some of the missing Windows controls. Along with fixing the bugs I've opened on things I've noticed that are wrong. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Inconsistent behavior between Windows and Linux

2009-06-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
that way in the past. I'm in favor of removing the restriction. In the next couple of days when you get a chance to look at it, let me know what you think. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] svn r4840 breaks something on Linux

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
construction: 00:00:00.735904 Test execution: 00:02:30.257031 Total time: 00:02:33.370445 [miesf...@osprey ooTest]$ Also, I've run the test suite a number of times on Windows, after the change, and don't see any problems there. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] svn r4840 breaks something on Linux

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
this change, Yeah, looking at the change I couldn't see why it would work different on Linux. -- Mark Miesfeld -- ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] svn r4840 breaks something on Linux

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Miesfeld
as to reboot after the uinstall and before I reinstalled the different package. Before starting the test suite I check that rxapi is running, and it is. Either started as root, or started by a reboot. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Text not echoed to terminal bug

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
be, should I rebuild everything, and should we then announce it formally as a RC1? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days

[Oorexx-devel] Additions to the automated part of the test suite

2009-06-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker

Re: [Oorexx-devel] RexxDoc - Asking for your thoughts

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
.) -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
running the test suite on a similar system and see what I get. Also, are you using the beta tree or trunk for the interpreter? -- Mark Miesfeld On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:57 AM, David Ashley david.ashley@gmail.comwrote: All - I tried to use the latest testunit from SourceForge (dated 6/17

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
build. Neither runs had any errors. I'm rebuilding with an updated beta branch now, then I'll run the suite with that. There were a few commits in the beta branch after 4802. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Are you an open source

Re: [Oorexx-devel] TestUnit Output from ooRexx on zLinux

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Miesfeld
there are no errors on Windows either.) All I could suggest is trying a completely fresh check out of both the test suite and the interpreter. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with ooRexx 4.0 and ooRexxUnit

2009-06-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
::attribute endTicking private unguarded In your copy, edit isTicking and endTicking and add the unguarded keyword. That should fix things up. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Problems with ooRexx 4.0 and ooRexxUnit

2009-06-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
one. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 Beta Refreshed (r4801), Now Available

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Miesfeld
The 4.0 beta packages have been rebuilt and are now uploaded to SourceForge. The Subversion revision number is around 4801. The files are available at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119701 A number of bugs were reported and fixed. The ooRexx team believes that several

[Oorexx-devel] FYI

2009-06-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
I'm back. Just starting to go through my e-mail. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI

2009-06-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Rick McGuireobject.r...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, glad to hear from you finally, I was starting to get a little worried, since you'd originally indicated you'd be back on the 7th. Yes, I was having too much fun and stayed an extra week. grin -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Where do we stand with 4.0.0?

2009-06-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Okay, I just finished browsing through the stuff I missed. It seems there were few more important bugs fixed, the file handles one for example. Should we build another beta, build a release candidate, or ... ? -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Should I do a refresh build of the beta?

2009-05-23 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: I believe most of the fixes since the last refresh have been fairly trivial problems.  I don't see that there is a need for a refresh at this point. Yeah, that's what I was thinking. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] 4702 breaks PipeLines application

2009-05-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
thread than the one that created it. But, is there some reason why he can't use AttachThread() of the Interpreter context? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT

Re: [Oorexx-devel] 4702 breaks PipeLines application

2009-05-21 Thread Mark Miesfeld
object, this will work, correct? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Tests

2009-05-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
, but you could also make it finer grained and have two different test types if you wanted. Give me a name for the test type and I'll go through the framework and make sure I coded everything I meant to. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Tests

2009-05-18 Thread Mark Miesfeld
to the implementation, but the interface as described above will stay the same. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
it forces all the external test binaries to be rebuilt. I usually use that whenever I have rebuilt the interpreter. ./testOORexx.rex -B -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
sudirectory) so that it won't execute. Rerun the test suit and see if it hangs or finishes normally. * if it does finish normally, try running just that one test group, but comment out the test that hangs to see if it is truly just that one test that causes things to hang. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] Segmentation fault on Linux

2009-05-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
is yelling at me to get off the computer. Do you have a 32-bit Linux you could use to take a look at it? -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Segmentation fault on Linux

2009-05-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. On all my 64-bit Linux systems it works fine. (I had actually run the test suite on 4 different distributions.) -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Segmentation fault on Linux

2009-05-17 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, Not sure if this helps much when taken with the stack trace I sent you, but the test case that causes the seg fault is: ::method test_queryDir_not_exists In ooRexx/base/bif/STREAM.testGroup -- Mark Miesfeld On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. Rather than announce a new build today and then another new build on Sunday, I think I'll just hold off until Sunday. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
the test suite. I've added some stream tests and when I first ran the test suite a number of them failed on Linux that passed on Windows. Some of the failures (most) were test case design problems, so it would be could to see if there are any surprises on AIX. -- Mark Miesfeld

[Oorexx-devel] stream 'open read replace'

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
' being not allowed. So, I'm not sure whether this is a bug, or just an allowable operating system difference. Before I rewrite the test case or remove it, I wanted to be sure it is not a bug in the unix StreamNative.cpp -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[4675] test/trunk/ooRexx/base/class/Stream.testGroup

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Miesfeld
either.) -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing

[Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
of 'show stopper' bugs is dwindling. Maybe we could do a build on say the 22nd and call it a Release Candidate. Then do the final release around May 8th, provided it seemed ready of course. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: That seems like a reasonable plan. Good. Release Candidate.  Then do the final release around May 8th, provided I meant June 8th of course. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] FYI stuff

2009-05-13 Thread Mark Miesfeld
they start arriving on Sunday or Monday. If Monday, I'll do the build on Sunday intstead. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may

[Oorexx-devel] Inconsistency in stream~arrayout() / arrayin()

2009-05-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
as 4.0.0, so it is not a case of a change that was introduced recently. Should we change it to case insensitive, or just leave it the way it is? -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Inconsistency in stream~arrayout() / arrayin()

2009-05-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Even using Abbrev() is inconsistent with other Rexx option usage.  It really only look at the first character (in a caseless manner, of course). I think this should be changed. Okay, I'll change that. -- Mark

[Oorexx-devel] stream~supplier bug?

2009-05-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
In the documentation for .Stream~supplier, it says: Returns a Supplier object for the stream containing the remaining stream lines and linenumber positions for the stream. Containing the *remaining stream lines, led me to expect that after reading 3 lines of a 18 line file, and then getting a

Re: [Oorexx-devel] stream~supplier bug?

2009-05-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
expect. I was going to open a bug so you could look at it whenever you want. Do you want me to? -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may

Re: [Oorexx-devel] stream~supplier bug?

2009-05-12 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Sure...though the code for the supplier is written entirely in ooRexx code if you'd like to try tackling this one.  The code is in StreamClasses.orx. Okay, I'll do this one. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Feature Questions

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
with the sockets.cls. The sockets.cls is in the distribution. I'll just edit that sentence. At this point in the cycle, I don't think David intends to include them, but if he does, we can just edit the sentence again. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Feature Questions

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Gil Barmwater gbarmwa...@alum.rpi.edu wrote: Where is the sockets.cls, in the samples? In the distribution, it is in the root of the install directory. Alongside ooDialog.cls, rxftp.cls, etc.. In the source tree itself it is in extensions/rxsock. -- Mark

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New Feature Questions

2009-05-09 Thread Mark Miesfeld
., samples use the class. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Could not find routine SYSFILETREE

2009-05-07 Thread Mark Miesfeld
rpm did you install? Did you get it from SourceForge, if so, what was the file name? -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Could not find routine SYSFILETREE

2009-05-07 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:06 PM, William Estrada mrumun...@popdial.com wrote:  I just upgraded(?) to FC10. I installed the rexx rpm. Now when I run a proven script I get this:    Could not find routine SYSFILETREE

Re: [Oorexx-devel] SVN checkout

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
or update and get strange error messages. Then it clears up a little later. Hopefully it will clear up for you. For what it's worth, I don't have a problem here right now. The only thing I would suggest is try it without the --config-dir arg. -- Mark Miesfeld This is the error: svn

[Oorexx-devel] Some basic problem with the API tests

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. There seems to be a group centered around tests/haltExit.rex and this code: address cmd HALT -- this is handled by the command exit -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Unapplied patch

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Miesfeld
was kind of hanging back to see if you or David said anything. I'll apply it and test it. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Installing from source

2009-05-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, I got the correct source tar file and tested building from it. (Which works with just ./configure make) Alright, now I have it uploaded to SourceForge. The file name is the same, but if you look at the date you

[Oorexx-devel] Trivial (?) difference in stream() behavior

2009-05-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
in the test suite failing, but it is easy enough to change it to expect 93.0. -- Mark Miesfeld -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Installing from source

2009-05-03 Thread Mark Miesfeld
. I'll fix that later today. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Installing from source

2009-05-03 Thread Mark Miesfeld
wrong with wanting to build yourself, I probably would. As I said just curious. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Starting to think about WSC

2009-05-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
of relatively simple bugs that I fixed, that at the time I thought would have bit a lot of people using WSH. Yet only one person opened a bug. That gave me the sense that not a lot of people were using it. That's why I think the offering of a useful, functional WSH would be appealing. -- Mark

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 Beta Refreshed Again (r4567), Now Available

2009-04-30 Thread Mark Miesfeld
The 4.0 beta packages have been rebuilt and are now uploaded to SourceForge. The subversion revision number is 4567. The files are available at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119701 A number of bugs were reported and fixed. Enough to justify doing a fresh build. We

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A wish list item for the test framework.

2009-04-28 Thread Mark Miesfeld
executes it. If you specify a single file and single test case, the framework does the bare minimum to execute that 1 test case. I think I'll open a RFE so I don't forget it. -- Mark Miesfeld Rick -- Register Now

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
there within the same function. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I have one more thing to try.  I'm starting to think this might be a memory-management issue, not an I/O issue.  The buffer used for the I/O is one of the few places

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Okay, it's built. I sent Mike the link to get it. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: I've applied the patch and am building the install package right now. I'll let you know when it's ready Mike. Rick, I'm hopeful about this.  On Windows

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
buffer has data in it (probably, depending on fast he is typing) when the interpreter starts. I'll post as soon as I try it with the patched version. -- Mark Miesfeld. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried reproducing using the patched version

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
on it. When I then hit ENTER, I get the RXIT. I just tried not hitting ENTER, but instead using the arrow key to move to the start of the line and retype 'exit' I still get the RXIT. I haven't tried this 'pasting' think on 3.2.0. Going to do that next. -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Okay, I'll try that. Tried with 3.2.0 about 10 times and it never happened. On 4.0.0, it happens for me every single time I paste the lines into the console window. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm, this is starting to push

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
commenting out _setMode(fileHandle, _O_BINARY); in setStdIn and it didn't seem to help. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
I saw your commit and am building from trunk right now. (Guess I should have built from the beta.) But, I think trunk is good enough for Mike to just try. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: I think I've fixed this!  A big thanks to Rony

Re: [Oorexx-devel] I/O again

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
It's fixed for me also. The new test build is almost ready, I'll let Mike know as soon as it is available. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: I think I've fixed this!  A big thanks to Rony...his method for reproducing this was 100

[Oorexx-devel] I'll refresh the beta builds today

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
also. Rainer - don't feel pressured to do an AIX build. When you have time is fine. I'll add it to the files at that time. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 - 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
me get you a build from the beta branch too be sure we are comparing apples to apples. I realize it might be too late for you to test it today, maybe tomorrow. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Build 4507 - 4521

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
be sure exactly what the source is. -- Mark Miesfeld On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: This could conceivably be caused by the same change, but I'm probably going to need something to recreate this so I can debug. Rick On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:55 PM

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.0 Beta Refreshed (r4525), Now Available

2009-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
The ooRexx 4.0 Beta files on SourceForge have been refreshed. The subversion level is 4525. All bugs reported during this beta, to date, have been fixed in this build. The files are available at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=119701 Those people participating in the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Tracked down problem with: compiler, Vista, ?

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
a bug slip through to the release than switching to SysFile. I've been working with builds from both VS 2008 and VS 2005, it would just depend on which system I was on at the time -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports #45

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Tracked down problem with: compiler, Vista, ?

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
need to uninstall 2005 first? Here's a link that says you can and has some info on things to do / watch out for. I did'nt think you could, but I guess you can since the source is Microsoft. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Tracked down problem with: compiler, Vista, ?

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: Did you forget to paste the link? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms246609.aspx Didn't have my coffee yet. grin -- Mark Miesfeld

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Tracked down problem with: compiler, Vista, ?

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: In working on the SysFileSearch bug, I tracked down what seems to be a case where the VS 2005 compiler produces wrong code and the VS 2008 produces code that works. Good thing I said seems to be. I was 100% wrong

Re: [Oorexx-devel] We desperately need some I/O test cases.

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
path. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing

Re: [Oorexx-devel] We desperately need some I/O test cases.

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote: How about it folks, any volunteers out there willing to write some test cases for a problem area? Please do so folks. Oh, I forgot to add

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Experimenting security checks option

2009-04-26 Thread Mark Miesfeld
it at DeviceName[3] which is probably where the security error comes from, a buffer overrun. -- Mark Miesfeld -- Crystal Reports #45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >