If streamsocket depends on the socket stuff, then I think it properly
belongs in the rxock docs. Location based on inheritance hierarchy
would imply that all classes belong on the reference because they are
all subclasses of Object. That said, I think we need to have pointers
in the reference
Rick McGuire wrote:
Here's a thought. Maybe rxftp should be merged in with the Rxsock
information + socket + streamsocket to produce an ooRexx Networking
manual. Then when things like SMTP and MIME are ready, those have an
obvious home waiting for them as well.
Rick
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008
Hello,
A little bit off topic but can someone point me
to an example of using sockets with ooRexx (or
an NNTP cient implementation in ooRexx).
greetings,
Klaas Punt
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin
. Thanks again, but the tool's requirements preclude my
using it.
Do you know of a VM/CMS workalike that runs under SUSE?
_
From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:02
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel
: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls and StreamSocket.cls
Yes, the solution is always have the already overbooked core team do
more. I'm getting tired of that answer too.
Rick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
The continued health
Dan Carter wrote:
Do you know of a VM/CMS workalike that runs under SUSE?
Well, you can run VM/CMS on top of Hercules System/370, ESA/390, and
z/Architecture Emulator
http://www.hercules-390.org/
Of course you have to have VM to run it!
--
Jack J. Woehr# Self-delusion is
.
-Original Message-
From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 15:50
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls and StreamSocket.cls
Yes, the solution is always have the already overbooked core team do
more. I'm
Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls and StreamSocket.cls
Yes, the solution is always have the already overbooked core team do
more. I'm getting tired of that answer too.
Rick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
is a programming tool whose depth and
breadth is unmatched by similar but more narrowly-focused tools.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miesfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 22:32
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls
Object Rexx is a programming tool whose depth and
breadth is unmatched by similar but more narrowly-focused tools.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miesfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 22:32
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel
I like the idea of a networking manual, but still like the idea of
cross-referencing at some level.
/s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest
Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls and StreamSocket.cls
I like the idea of a networking manual, but still like the idea of
cross-referencing at some level.
/s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm
Message-
From: Bill Turner, WB4ALM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 05:50
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls and StreamSocket.cls
I like the idea of a networking manual, but still like the idea of
cross-referencing
Dan Carter wrote:
I am building tools to aid in my mainframe-to-unix
practice
Have you looked at PigIron http://pigiron.sourceforge.net yet? In the
course of striving to automate
testing, I accidentally coded a complete OORexx interface to z/VM SMAPI :)
--
Jack J. Woehr#
Rick, I sure hope that you do not pull the plug... there are many of
us who appreciate the work that you and the rest of the core team have
put into ooRexx --- and I suspect that some, like me, did not know
where, or how, to start. I did ask questions and Mark M, answered far
more quickly
Yes, the solution is always have the already overbooked core team do
more. I'm getting tired of that answer too.
Rick
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
The continued health of this project requires an active, growing
community.
IBM let
.
-Original Message-
From: Rick McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 15:50
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Socket.cls and StreamSocket.cls
Yes, the solution is always have the already overbooked core team do
more. I'm getting
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Dan Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick has a point.
As usual. grin
Now, if someone will just give me the userid and password I need to
actually enter the repository and look at it in Tortoise, I will
proceed. The message box is attached.
You don't need a
Rick McGuire wrote:
Yes, the solution is always have the already overbooked core team do
more. I'm getting tired of that answer too.
Here's a couple of thoughts:
Bring BSF4Rexx and Rony in as deep as you can drag him/them.
Image BSF4Rexx and then RexxJSock ... no more compiling
funky C
From a first thought I would probably go to rxsock to find the doc on
streamsocket, (because I am thinking sockets at the time) so maybe the
doc should be there, with a comment in the rexref that the
documentation is actually in rxsock.
Likewise, I think that other external packages should
20 matches
Mail list logo
