On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
hakan hexi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
should be solved by oneself ...
Yes, if one has accepted a mature but inflexible product. But Mark has
asked for comments on the way the package is
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
hakan hexi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
should be solved by oneself ...
Yes, if one has accepted a mature but
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
And indeed, you could also just change the name of the file used for
::requires and keep the names the same. That would allow for a pretty
seamless upgrade path and it would still coexist with other programs that
used a different version.
I realise
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
If the ooSQLite package gets included in the ooRexx distribution then an
application written that uses ooSQLite will run on any system where the
user of the application has ooRexx installed. And the user will not have
to install anything else.
But
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
If the ooSQLite package gets included in the ooRexx distribution then an
application written that uses ooSQLite will run on any system where the
user of
satisfied with it.
Great work !
/hex
-
Ursprungligt Meddelande:
Från: Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org
Till: oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopia:
Datum: fredag, 15 juni 2012 17:17
Ämne: Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooSQLiteDB name change to ooSQLiteDbConn
hakan hexi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
No offense, but...
and none taken.
Isn't it great that someone take their time to implement the interface to
SQLite when oneself is not talent/or lack the knowledge how to do it !.
Yes, absolutely.
If SQLite will evolve and that is delayed/not
Op 05-jun-12 schreef Mark Miesfeld:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Lee Peedin l...@safedatausa.com wrote:
SQLite pretty much indicates a DB is involved. I'd suggest simply
ooSQLiteConn or even better IMHO ooSQLiteConnection.
Hi Lee,
I like using Connection rather than Conn myself.
--
Mark
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Klaas. kpli...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Op 05-jun-12 schreef Mark Miesfeld:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Lee Peedin l...@safedatausa.com wrote:
SQLite pretty much indicates a DB is involved. I'd suggest simply
ooSQLiteConn or even better IMHO ooSQLiteConnection.
SQLite pretty much indicates a DB is involved. I'd suggest simply ooSQLiteConn
or even better IMHO ooSQLiteConnection.
Lee
Sent From My iPhone
On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In anticipation that a higher level abstraction of a database class will
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Lee Peedin l...@safedatausa.com wrote:
SQLite pretty much indicates a DB is involved. I'd suggest simply
ooSQLiteConn or even better IMHO ooSQLiteConnection.
Hi Lee,
I like using Connection rather than Conn myself.
--
Mark Miesfeld
11 matches
Mail list logo
