I like the web site too. It has a sophisticated feel.
Nice one Dan for picking up the Heinlein reference - that was one of my
favourite books back in the days when I had time to read. I wore it out
just looking at it!
Jon
2008/7/17 Dan Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That did not come out the
That did not come out the way I intended. I meant no slight to Mike
Cowlishaw; rather, I was referring to the Mike sometimes known as Adam
Selene and generally associated with Holmes IV.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Carter
Sent: Thursday, Jul
It looks good, David. I vote to go with it. Thank Mike (not Cowlishaw)
for his support.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Ashley
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 13:50
To: oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Oorexx-devel] New ooRexx Website
Yeah, it looks good David.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All -
>
> FYI, I have been working on a new RexxLA and ooRexx web site. The new RexxLA
> website still has some work to be done but the new ooRexx web site is ready
> for testin
I like it.
Thanks,
David Ruggles
CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+
Network Engineer Safe Data, Inc.
(910) 285-7200[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Ashley
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:50 PM
To: oorexx-devel@
All -
FYI, I have been working on a new RexxLA and ooRexx web site. The new
RexxLA website still has some work to be done but the new ooRexx web site
is ready for testing. You can try it out at
http://www.holmes4.com/
It has some nice new features, a much cleaner design and a new structure.
The
I just ran across this tidbit of information and thought I would post
it so we have the information captured in the archives.
It looks as though you can even use the free Visual C++ Express
edition to do a 64-bit compile.
Note
64-bit tools are not available on Visual C++ Express Edition by
defaul
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect it's time to move forward on what the minimum compiler level
> is too. I think your target is reasonable, but I'd like to understand
> what issues we have with the 6.0 level before committing on a version.
The is
I suspect it's time to move forward on what the minimum compiler level
is too. I think your target is reasonable, but I'd like to understand
what issues we have with the 6.0 level before committing on a version.
Extensions built with older levels should not be an issue. Those are
just code and e
