Hi,
Much to my surprise, I have a working install package for oorexx on
mac. Now what do I do with it.
Yours,
Bruce
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer
approach for the test suite.
In the meantime, you can remove some of these conditionals and
everything should be fine.
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 30 sep 2009, at 21:58, CVBruce wrote:
Mark,
Ok, I manually started the rxapi daemon, and just let the output go
to the screen. This is what I
Well I did some more testing on the condition that failed during the
ooTest.
I can't get the nil object to delete an environmental variable.
Say VALUE(FRED,7,ENVIRONMENT);
Say VALUE(FRED,.NIL,ENVIRONMENT);
SAY VALUE(FRED,,ENVIRONMENT); == Yields 7
This is on ooRexx V4.0.0GA, Mac OS X.
Any
Ok, I've been starring at this code, and I think that I understand it
now.
The question I have is this.
I can see where the memory that was alloc'd for the environmental
variable. I can see where the memory is free'd. But I don't see
where the pointer to the memory is set to a
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:07 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've been starring at this code, and I think that I understand it
now.
The question I have is this.
I can see where the memory that was alloc'd for the environmental
variable. I can see where the memory is free'd
that was free'd, in the prior call.
I think that this can be fixed by putting an '=' sign into the first
character of the environmental variable, prior to free'ing the memory.
Bruce
On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:07 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote
I personally like using getenv, setenv, and unsetenv. The
documentation could be changed to say something like passing .NIL will
delete the environment variable on those systems that support the
unsetenv(3) call.
On my man page it says
putenv() no longer copies its input buffer. This
I like short +1 for me too.
I did lookup .RXJ and .RXJO on filext.com, and no one else is using
those extensions, unlike .REX and .RX
Bruce
On Oct 13, 2009, at 5:16 AM, David Ruggles wrote:
I like the shortest version of file extensions possible so I say +1 to
Chip's suggestion as well.
Hi,
I updated the wikipedia assigned ports page to include port 10010 TCP
for rxapi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_numbers
Next question about rxapi. are there any command line arguments?
Does rxapi log any messages and if so how and where?
Thanks,
Bruce
the inclination and z/OS
expertise/access,
we'll never see ooRexx ported there.
-Chip-
On 11/19/09 23:43 CVBruce said:
Not true. The I/O steam was available as a download for Z/OS, and
it
was included in the Rexx/MVS compiler.
Bruce
On Nov 19, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Chip Davis wrote
Jean-Louis,
The basic idea sounds good to me, but not being familiar with the .odg
file type, I wonder if it will display and print correctly on systems
that do not have some version of Open Office installed. Perhaps you
can send out a .pdf that contains a .odg image in it for testing?
Hi,
Just tried to compile 4.0.1, and it blew up. Perhaps a header file is
missing? Perhaps configure didn't pick up that I don't have this
function.
From an Apple mail list:
First off it is not a bsd program because it uses lseek64.
You can just use lseek on *bsd and Darwin(Mac OS X) when
Also, open64() is not supported because open() supports 64 bit
operating systems.
My quick and dirty #define lseek64 lseek didn't work. It looks like I
have some more work to do.
Bruce
--
Download Intel#174;
, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, open64() is not supported because open() supports 64 bit
operating systems.
My quick and dirty #define lseek64 lseek didn't work. It looks
like I
have some more work to do.
This looks like it works for other people:
#ifdef __APPLE__ __MACH__
#define
are welcomed.
Thanks,
Bruce
On Apr 1, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, open64() is not supported because open() supports 64 bit
operating systems.
My quick and dirty #define lseek64 lseek didn't work. It looks
it someplace else?
Thanks for the help.
Bruce
On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:45 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I need more advice now.
After I run make install, all of the necessary files are moved to
/opt/ooRexx
/opt/ooRexx/bin
...
I then run
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:00 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also working on building the install package from the command
line
so that build a new package from a make file. So far I've put the
scripts that are required and other bits and pieces in platform/
unix
, 2010 at 12:55 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran the testOORexx.rex script. Here is the output. I need help
on what
to do next.
I do have a Mac OS X installer ready to go. What should I do with
it.
Yours,
Bruce
ooTest Framework - Automated Test of the ooRexx Interpreter
I guess you can chalk up the TIME.testGroup failure to pilot error. I
took out the TRACE statements, and reran the complete test again, and
got no error this time.
Bruce
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Hi Mark,
I updated the code that was failing, in the test, and I now have a
version of ooRexx 4.0.1 that passes all of the tests.
ooTest Framework - Automated Test of the ooRexx Interpreter
Interpreter: REXX-ooRexx_4.0.1(MT) 6.03 4 Apr 2010
Addressing Mode: 32
ooRexxUnit:
success*/
On Apr 5, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote:
Hello,
what exactly did you change do fix the
/Users/bjskelly/4.0.1/ooRexx/base/bif/VALUE.testGroup in 32 bit
mode ???
Bye
Rainer
CVBruce wrote:
Hi Mark,
I updated the code that was failing, in the test
Hi,
When building oorexx from source, make install does not complete all
of the actions that a binary install does using the Mac OS X installer
package. Specifically, after moving the executable modules to the /
opt/ooRexx directories, the binary install then runs a post install
script to
that it might be very confusing if you don't link the files
and
start rxapi. But you should also remove all this during an uninstall.
David Ashley
On 04/05/2010 02:51 PM, CVBruce wrote:
Hi,
When building oorexx from source, make install does not complete all
of the actions that a binary
What do you think of updating the install file from:
%
Mac OSX
---
There are .dmg install packages for both Intel and PowerPC based Mac OSX
systems. The commands to install a .dmg file are as follows:
%
to:
%
Mac OSX
---
Building ooRexx from source.
1. Run the bootstrap script.
Thank you, everyone.
Mark:
That's probably a good thing. I think that, although those patches
work, they need more work.
Bruce
On Apr 11, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Rick McGuire
object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that
Hi All,
I'm still working on trying to create a PowerPC(ppc) version of 4.0.1
Beta 1. Just to recap, the i386 version works just fine.
I guess rexximage is executed during the make. i386, no problem, ppc
I get:
./rexximage
creating the system specific methods ...
Adding setlike methods to
It's got to be something like that.
When I build the x86_64 architecture, rexximage hung.
The ppc buss erred.
I deleted my /opt/ooRexx installation, which was i386, and stopped the
rxapi server/service, and I think that was the problem. Look I know
have a ppc executable:
Well it looks like I've create 3 working versions of ooRexx, one each
architecture in i386, x86_64, and ppc. They all pass testOORexx.rex.
I haven't been able to make a ppc64 version yet. Not sure why.
The question I have is this.
I can make three different installer packages, or I could
If you've had problems in the past with people getting the wrong
version, then I agree universal would be the way to go. Let the
operating system figure out which on it wants to run. It would also
benefit those that have to install on many machines, just one install
method.
I'll start
Hi,
I'm having trouble creating a universal binary for Mac OS X. Each of
the individual binaries (x86_64, i386 and ppc), individually pass
testOORexx.rex, but when I glue them together with lipo, I get
problems. Rxapi seems to execute, and it selects an appropriate
architecture
McGuire wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble creating a universal binary for Mac OS X. Each of
the individual binaries (x86_64, i386 and ppc), individually pass
testOORexx.rex, but when I glue them together with lipo, I get
problems
wrote:
The rexx.img file can't be shared between 32- and 64-bit versions
either. The layout of the C++ classes are not compatible.
Rick
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:51 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, then let me try making an intel with both 32bit and 64bit
architectures and see
Hi,
I wanted to run this past you for comment.
My thought at this point is to create all three architectures. For
binary files, I would append an architecture identifier to the file,
e.g. rexx.i386 or rexx.ppc. When the post install script runs, I
would detect the current machine
Is ooRexx context free? It seems to be that it isn't, but I could be
wrong. Very thin in knowledge in this area.
Bruce
On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote:
I seem to remember that the ANSI standard has (classic) Rexx in BNF.
You can get a PDF here:
Reading a little bit about Puppy Linux, it sounds like it is a very
stripped down Linux distribution. So perhaps they went a little too
far in removing things.
Bruce
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:11 PM, David Ashley wrote:
Not ever having dealt with Puppy Linux I am really surprised. All
modern
I was looking at the llvm compiler, and was wondering if anyone had
compiled oorexx with it.
Thanks,
Bruce
--
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
and any performance
penalties that may be incurred.
Bruce
On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm not even sure what that compiler *is*, but I'm pretty sure I
haven't tried it.
Rick
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at the llvm
Rick,
How much are we talking about. Perhaps we could solicit some
donations to cover it.
Bruce
On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
About 10 years ago, I did a lot of performance work on Object Rexx.
Key to that performance works was having access to the performance
profiler
:19 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Rick,
How much are we talking about. Perhaps we could solicit some
donations to cover it.
Bruce
On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
About 10 years ago, I did a lot of performance work on Object Rexx.
Key to that performance works
Ok I'll start building tomorrow.
Thanks,
Bruce
Sent from my iPod
On May 2, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I've created the 4.0.1 release source tree directory in subversion and
have the 4.0.1 folder / builds started on SourceForge. I guess this
message is
I know that I wrote the ooRexx V4.0.1 scripts for MacOS preflight and
postflight to touch only the things that were ooRexx. They will not
remove BSF4Rexx if present. I know that the version 3.2 ooRexx install
for MacOS included BSF4Rexx.
Bruce
On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Mark Miesfeld
, Mac OS X 10.4, so that more people can
use it. I haven't tested it on 10.6 (Snow Leopard), and will do that.
Bruce
On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 02.08.2010 20:14, CVBruce wrote:
I know that I wrote the ooRexx V4.0.1 scripts for MacOS preflight and
postflight
Hi,
I've been playing around with pipes today after the discussion about
Chars and Lines returning 0 for transient streams.
I wrote a couple of programs to play around with.
Here is the first program called Sender.rex
#!/usr/bin/rexx
Buffer = XRange(0,9)||XRange(A,Z)||XRange(a,z)||$#
X =
Maybe we should just skip August and go right to September. This
month is becoming problematic.
Bruce
On Aug 8, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/c6wf8e4z.aspx#1
I didn't notice that, until I tried to debug the problem reported by
Bruce.
Ok looks like I made a bad assumption.
When the problem was first presented, I said that it wasn't about
STDIN, but with transient streams, because this fails
cat data.txt | myprogram.rex
While this doesn't
myprogram.rex data.txt
The only difference I could see was that the pipe makes it a
I would agree with that. I know that [t]csh used to be the default on
Mac OS X, but they changed to bash some time ago. I can't seem to
retrain myself, so I use ksh. Does anyone know the default on
Solaris? or AIX?
Bruce
On Aug 10, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
It seems
to be the things bin, lib, and include.
Bruce
On Aug 11, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:48 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of the Mac OS X install I have to create a shell script to
put
the symbolic links into /usr/bin etc.
The installer executes
All good points Mark. Although as you can see, I'm finding it easier
to install from source than to build a #...@*!@ installer package.
Bruce
On Aug 11, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:32 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
...
There are really two
It works well for me. Perhaps the biggest thing that it doesn't do
for me is to get the rxapid script into an appropriate place so that
it gets started. On the other hand once the script is in place, I
don't see it changing all that often.
Bruce
On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Ashley
FYI, On Mac OS X, it is just open, i.e. open http://www.RexxLA.org or
open /opt
Bruce
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:
How about just using the URL as the command? On Windows that will
open the WWW page using the default browser.
From: Rony G. Flatscher
I guess I'm still not on the oorexx-svn list.
Bruce
Begin forwarded message:
From: oorexx-svn-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: August 19, 2010 3:00:09 PM PDT
To: bjske...@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: SF.net SVN: oorexx:[6124] main/trunk/platform/unix/macosx/
PackageInfo.in
You are not
Thanks Rick.
Bruce
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
You should be added now.
Rick
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:03 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I'm still not on the oorexx-svn list.
Bruce
Begin forwarded message:
From: oorexx-svn-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
I just built ooRexx of off the main trunk.
The version of ooRexx built was 4.1.0, but the libraries are 4.0.2.
Bruce
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry
version. It is a completely different versioning scheme.
David Ashley
On 08/19/2010 05:21 PM, CVBruce wrote:
Hi,
I just built ooRexx of off the main trunk.
The version of ooRexx built was 4.1.0, but the libraries are 4.0.2.
Bruce
So the current library version number should be
$(ORX_CURRENT).$(ORX_AGE).$(ORX_REVISION)
Thanks,
Bruce
On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that. It complicates the install - uninstall
process
Yes I was referring to build time, when I need the information to
create the input files for installer package creation.
The installer package needs the information to create the appropriate
symlinks.
Bruce
On Aug 20, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:01 AM,
Hi,
I have rexx installed in /opt/ooRexx. In /usr/bin if have a symlink
to /opt/ooRexx/bin/rexx.
/opt/ooRexx/bin is not in my $PATH, and /opt/ooRexx/lib is not in my
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
In /opt/ooRexx/bin there are numerous *.cls files.
I guess my question is how does ooRexx find these
(as documented in the
programming guide). I don't remember the order off the top of my
head but one of
the places to look is in the PATH.
David Ashley
On 08/20/2010 10:29 PM, CVBruce wrote:
Hi,
I have rexx installed in /opt/ooRexx. In /usr/bin if have a symlink
to /opt/ooRexx/bin/rexx.
/opt
Yes, I caught that, my fault. Do an update, I corrected it a while ago.
Bruce
On Aug 21, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
If I'm not wrong, a closing quote is missing in trunk/Makefile.am
Replace
sed -e s/^VER=/VER=$(ORX_MAJOR)/ -e s/^REL=/REL=$(ORX_AGE)/ -e
Seems to be working fine for me. I'm running svn version 1.6.11.
Bruce
On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:59 AM, David Ashley wrote:
All -
You may have noticed that there have been no builds of the Win XP
version of
ooRexx on the build machine for two weeks. I finally got around to
trying to
I don't mean to start a war or anything, but shouldn't the package
manager, apt-get, if not install required prerequisite packages, at
least warn the user that prerequisites have not been satisfied? Or is
this a case that the package to be installed, doesn't list all
prerequisites? It
What about the rxapi service? Won't that require somesort of admin
auth?
Bruce
On Aug 24, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Walter Pachl pa...@chello.at
wrote:
Sitting
I was thinking of rxapi opening port 10010. I forgot that only ports
below 1024 require admin auth.
Bruce
On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the rxapi service? Won't that require somesort of admin
I wish I could help, but I just don't know enough.
If your application is configured with automake tools, then they
should be able to make a reasonable make file. If you have just one
file to compile perhaps I can be of some help, if you give me more
details, for example what does the make
I'll go check. To tell you the truth, I just copied it from someplace
else in the code. Perhaps is should be instead of ?
Thanks,
Bruce
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:16 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
Hi Bruce
In unix/rexxutil.cpp :
#ifdef __APPLE__ __MACH
generates this warning under Linux
Thanks Mike. I'll go make the changes.
Bruce
On Sep 1, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:
In unix/rexxutil.cpp :
#ifdef __APPLE__ __MACH
generates this warning under Linux
./extensions/rexxutil/platform/unix/rexxutil.cpp:170:18: warning:
extra tokens at end of #ifdef directive
, in
SysFile.cpp:
#if defined(__APPLE__) defined(__MACH__)
so you should have copied that. grin
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:06 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll go check. To tell you the truth, I just copied it from
someplace
else in the code. Perhaps
that. grin
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:06 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll go check. To tell you the truth, I just copied it from
someplace
else in the code. Perhaps is should be instead of ?
Thanks,
Bruce
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:16 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher
I still have work to do on packaging for V4.1 (trunk). Can someone
tell me if there is a date that we are looking at for the next stage
( beta?).
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel
like the next
release to include the new regex classes I've been working on, but
that also requires a bit more work.
Rick
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:35 AM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I still have work to do on packaging for V4.1 (trunk). Can someone
tell me if there is a date that we
I wouldn't mind that either.
Bruce
On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's no target date currently. The work I was doing to
implement a
try/catch/throw exception model still requires a bit more
As someone requested I did go in and subscribe to the svn list. After
I subscribed, I still got a message saying my post had been rejected.
Bruce
On Sep 4, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
I'm still not seeing commits from Bruce, and as it turns out Brandon,
from the svn list.
Hi,
On the netrexx list this morning they were talking about the PC370 card that
had System/370 on a chip. I googled it and found an article in Wikipedia,
which led me to the article on Hercules, the System/370 emulator.
It turns out the Hercules can emulate z/Arch, and run the current z/OS
Hi,
In response to my posting in the Hercules group, a user responded that he can
setup accounts on a real system running RH55 and or SLES11 under z/VM.
Is there someone in our group that would be able to use this environment?
Thanks,
Bruce
On the Mac, there is an application in the /Applications/Utilities directory
called Java Preferences. Using this will allow you to change which JVM will
be used.
Bruce
On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Juergen Hesse wrote:
Hello!
Thanks to the 64 bit ooRexx version for MacOSX from CVBruce
on i386 and x86_64 also have this same
problem.
David Ashley
On 09/16/2010 01:34 PM, CVBruce wrote:
Hi,
In response to my posting in the Hercules group, a user responded that he
can setup accounts on a real system running RH55 and or SLES11 under z/VM.
Is there someone in our group
If you remember I struggled with rxapi, because the Mac documentation says that
a process started by Launch Services should not daemonize itself, which rxapi
does. I did get it to run, but I think I just found what they were talking
about.
09/27/10 9:01:45 AM
Hi,
It doesn't appear that Mac OSX has euidaccess either.
What path should I checkout in SVN so that I can pickup Ranier's changes for
AIX. I think mine will build on his.
Thanks,
Bruce
--
Increase Visibility of
Mark,
Thanks, that is not the one I guessed.
Bruce
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:43 AM, David Ashley
david.ashley@gmail.com wrote:
Which unit test snapshot (or trunk) should I use to test 4.1.0? I want to do
as
good a job as I can.
Thanks Mark, I did catch that, and I have the change coded, but not committed
yet.
Bruce
On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
Bruce,
This change:
-#if !defined (AIX)
+#if !defined (AIX) !defined (__APPLE__)
/**
* Method:SysEuidaccess
*
Also needs to be added
Hi,
Is there a reason that the directory and contents of trunk/platform/unix/macosx
was not included in the 4.1.0 beta?
Bruce
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest
Hi,
I'm looking at my rxapi problem on Mac OS X. I see in APIService.cpp that
there are provisions for running rxapi in foreground. It appears that when
this is done, that a different PID file is used. Is that, and all of the fork
and execs in morph2deamon the only difference between
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:06 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking at my rxapi problem on Mac OS X.
Hi Bruce,
What is the problem you are having with rxapi? Maybe, maybe not, if
we knew what the problem is someone might have an idea.
I thought you had things working
ooTest Framework - Automated Test of the ooRexx Interpreter
Interpreter: REXX-ooRexx_4.1.0(MT) 6.03 3 Dec 2010
Addressing Mode: 64
ooRexxUnit: 2.0.0_3.2.0ooTest: 1.0.0_4.0.0
Tests ran: 18290
Assertions: 573403
Failures:1
Errors: 0
Skipped
David,
I like your idea of a command line option for rxapi. Makes more sense than
creating a bunch of platform specific #ifdef's in the code. I could simply
update the .plist file to add the command line option to the invocation of the
daemon.
Bruce
On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:54 AM, David
I would think the best approach is to contact Avira, and complain about the
false positive. If they are on the up and up, they will verify your claim, and
fix their database so that it won't be flagged again.
As more and more viruses are released, it is only a matter of time before just
about
This kind of gets back to the read binary vs. read text argument. Read binary
would of course read every bit, while read text allows for meta data.
Bruce
On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:
I have a Rexx program that merges several small files onto
one large
one. As it
Rony,
I didn't publish those links on the list. I will if people want me to. The
links lead to 4.0.1 as you indicated. These are not good distributions of
ooRexx, in that there is no installer. They are simply compressed tar archives
of /opt/ooRexx in each architecture. They are suitable
On Feb 8, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 08.02.2011 06:23, CVBruce wrote:
It just passed testOORexx.rex.
Is that the ooRexx test framework that you mean by this (this would be
just great!) ?
As far as I know, it is. I was pointed towards this test framework by Mark.
It does
Thanks Rony,
I'll fix the file system 64 messages. I've already fixed a bunch of them so it
is no problem to fix a few more. I don't know about the format errors or the
nodebug errors.
Bruce
On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
as I know that one aim is to
Would it be possible to check the build machine to see if we are getting those
warning messages on other platforms?
Bruce
On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Rony,
I'll fix the file system 64 messages. I've
Some of the scripts to create a distributable package for ooRexx are located in
platform/unix/macos. The problem I ran into was that between 4.0.1 and 4.1 the
install strategy for ooRexx was completely changed. There are also parts of
the creation process that take part in the make install
Rony,
I don't think there is a problem with that. For example there is the GUI
Application 'PackageMaker', and there is the command line program
'packagemaker' I have written some scripts to create packages from the
Makefile. See: platform/unix/macosx/MakeRexxPackage
I think from my current
On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Bruce,
thank you very much for your pointers, feedback and your help!
On 09.02.2011 17:26, CVBruce wrote:
I don't think there is a problem with that. For example there is the GUI
Application 'PackageMaker', and there is the command
Hi,
I had to add a path to the ooRexx (4.1.0) libraries in /usr/lib/ooRexx. In
other *nix systems are these picked up automatically or do you have to add a
path to them?
In 4.0.1, I symlinked the libraries from /opt/ooRexx/lib/ooRexx/ to /usr/lib,
and I didn't require a specific path to
Ok, so the behavior I'm seeing is somewhat standard? Does this mean that the
libraries are going to stay where they are, or are they going back to
/opt/ooRexx/lib/ooRexx?
Thanks,
Bruce
On Feb 9, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:18 AM, CVBruce cvbr
Ok, sorry for the brain fart. for some reason, I thought ORX were MacOS
specific.
Thanks.
Bruce
On Feb 9, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:14 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just looking at configure.ac.
I see that around line 105, someone
If you are putting the programs into /usr/bin, then the corresponding place to
put the libraries would be /usr/lib. It would be inconsistent, in my mind to
add /usr/lib/ooRexx to the system path.
I just changed my copy of configure.ac to move ooRexx back to /opt/ooRexx, for
Mac OS X only.
I
. Or at least place symlinks
in
the system subdirectories.
David Ashley
On 02/09/2011 03:58 PM, CVBruce wrote:
If you are putting the programs into /usr/bin, then the corresponding place
to put the libraries would be /usr/lib. It would be inconsistent, in my
mind to add /usr/lib
Rony,
I've fixed configure.ac, preflight.in and postflight.in, per your suggestions,
in a copy of the 4.1.0 release:
https://oorexx.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/oorexx/sandbox/bruce/trunk/
As before the suggested method for creating a new version would be
export CFLAGS=-arch xxx
export
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
