make: *** [all] Error 2
This is after running ./bootstrap and ./configure of course.
Now there seems not even to be a platform/unix directory.
As for a debugger, MacOSX has an excellent one in XCode.
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 11 jul 2008, at 17:22, Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, now if I could
number change about a week ago.
Rick
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:31 PM, René Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ach so!
So the 4.0 version is in a directory called interpreter-3.x/trunk ?
That certainly is good to know.
I'll have a try.
Thanks!
René.
On 11 jul 2008, at 19:27, Rick McGuire
Rick,
got a bit further into the build
./kernel/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp: In member function 'bool
SysFile::read(char*, size_t, size_t)':
./kernel/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp:287: warning: comparison is always
true due to limited range of data type
but that is only a warning, but this is the
*, RXSTRING*))'
make: *** [librexx_la-LibraryPackage.lo] Error 1
René.
On 11 jul 2008, at 23:30, René Jansen wrote:
Rick,
got a bit further into the build
./kernel/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp: In member function 'bool
SysFile::read(char*, size_t, size_t)':
./kernel/platform/unix/SysFile.cpp
David,
I would suggest to use the Java version of Xalan, as it is identical on all
platforms and is easy to get to work. Also, I never had a good experience
with FOP and tables - probably passiveTex is still the way to go; or one of
the professional xsl:fop tools - that would be justifiable in
Hi Rainer,
just wanted to say that I appreciate your AIX work very much, firstly
because we run a lot of AIX here and I expect to install 4.0 when it is
ready, and secondly because I know that you are rooting a lot of the bugs
out that I otherwise would have encountered when I restart the work on
Gentlemen,
I do not seem to have byteswap.h
./rexxapi/common/platform/unix/SysCSStream.cpp:54:23: error: byteswap.h: No
such file or directory
Trying to have 4.0 compiled before the Symposium.
best regards,
René Vincent Jansen.
- it enables and helps one to write platform independent code
- will help standardization efforts
best regards,
René Jansen.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:54 PM, John Bodoh john_bo...@infrawise.com
wrote:
If the purpose is to isolate
I have a hit showstopper in the MacOSX version of ooRexx 4.0.0. 'pull' does
not return after an enter. I have to try to fix this somewhat later, but
please have a look also - and as a hint, it did work in 3.2.
Also, I have a problem, in that my G5 tower finally broke down. This means
that I can
Rick,
isn't this an excellent symposium (remote) presentation topic? ooRexx
memory usage patterns, workings of the garbage collector, strategies
to optimize current behaviour, future changes?
best regards,
René.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't
this.
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 18 apr 2009, at 19:36, Rick McGuire wrote:
Klaas,
The code is not going to get any more mature than it is at this point.
It should be hardward agnostic, so the architecture of your machine
should not be a problem. The only reason it has not been made
available
(I'll paste into sf when I am at a bigger computer)
I cannot quite see why rxapi needs to be run by root. It seems that
the only reason is that it insists on writing its pid to /var/run/
ooRexx.pid. I changed ownership on this file and it ran without error
in usermode by just starting it as
otherwise, I admit)
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 13 jul 2009, at 16:14, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
Well, when I saw the start of this thread, I was going to make the
following point. But, I see David already touched on it.
Nevertheless, I'm going to repeat it.
Besides any technical reasons
Mark,
the problem is not having to su - to install (and it actually does run
without doing this) but to have the process running as root - for no
reason.
best regards,
René Jansen/
On 15 jul 2009, at 01:13, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, David Ashleydavid.ashley
I think that is a good solution.
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 15 jul 2009, at 01:19, Rick McGuire wrote:
How about a compromise? We make the code changes to enable rxapi to
run as a normal process, but keep the install procedures the same for
now. The code is already in place to auto
not put in into the installer for Mac, so unless
it started it up itself it did not run.
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 15 jul 2009, at 16:00, David Ashley wrote:
There are two pieces to the rxapi story. First there is the rxapi
binary. Second, there is the rxapid shell script.
The rxapid
David,
great article, very well done!
best regards,
René Jansen.
(
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-kvm-build/?S_TACT=105AGX54S_CMP=C0716ca=dnw-1027ca=dth-lxopencm_mmc=5641-_-n-_-vrm_newsletter-_-10731_122200cmibm_em=dm:0:13680875
Rainer,
put me on the interested parties list. We have 6.1 also but I am
waiting on the compiler.
best regards,
René.
On 27 jul 2009, at 11:05, Rainer Tammer wrote:
Hello,
currently I am having a problem with ooRexx on AIX 6.1 - its not
working...
I have no idea why. My current
Hi Rainer,
I am also on this list - I was speaking rather metaforically.
In the meantime, I will test as soon as possible.
best regards,
René
On 27 jul 2009, at 12:09, Rainer Tammer wrote:
Hello,
Rick McGuire wrote:
It's waiting for a reply back from the rxapi daemon for a request to
Hi Moritz,
that seems like a good plan - can you please involve Jon Wolfers, as
he contributed quite some content?
best regards,
René Jansen
On 30 jul 2009, at 09:48, Moritz Hoffmann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
does this also affect the ooRexx wiki? If so
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer Tammer schrieb:
Whoa - better not change anything, as the autotools stuff is working
perfectly on the Mac right now, and did ever since Mark Hessling put
in support.
If something changes, please have it checked out first (in both senses)
best regards,
René
stack full? this is what the exception code hints at.
Remember there is also a native code stack involved here.
best regards,
René.
On 2 sep 2009, at 23:46, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
for quite a few weeks I have been trying to trace down one
particular nasty problem with the new
Bruce,
the REX121: Storage for data queues is exhausted. message has probably
to do with the rxapi daemon not running.
best regards,
René.
On 30 sep 2009, at 21:22, CVBruce wrote:
testOORexx.output.txt
--
Come
Excellent! Very nice - I will download Mono and will let you know how this
works on the Mac.
René Jansen.
On 7 feb 2010, at 03:21, James Johnson wrote:
For those of you familiar with running Rexx under IBMs VM environment,
I have created a class library that implements IBMs Pipelines
I think this is a good idea.
+1
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 18 feb 2010, at 15:28, Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm considering setting up a nabble account for archiving the oorexx
mailing lists. One advantage of using nabble is the archive is
generally internet searchable. The sourceforge
[Aside: I would argue that the reliance of language designers on simple
LALR parsers, etc., has significantly affected the development of
languages. It has made them easier for computers to process but harder
for people to use. I think that's backwards :-).]
Mike
I agree, but even
David,
I would have a hard look at case sensitivity first (60% of svn problems with
Windows).
best regards,
René.
On 30 aug 2010, at 00:44, David Ashley wrote:
It seems to be working now, at least some of the time. But I have a new
problem.
The Windows build script is now aborting.
fit this into their schedules, and are able to travel,
we would like to cordially invite you to join us in this milestone
symposium.
I look forward to your feedback.
best regards,
René Jansen.
--
Increase Visibility
It's back!
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:16 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I can ping it but no ssh or webserver. David Ashley mailed David Ruggles
already.
René
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz wrote:
Thanks Mark.
Yes it looks
I don't know if Mark H. has the Regina VM mods somewhere; they would be a
good starting point. I suggest we put the source for use on VM and z/OS in a
seperate branch which is in EBCDIC - or maybe we can have an svn plugin that
does the translation for us?
best regards,
René Jansen.
On Tue, Feb
I imagine that Classic Rexx must have been made to work with DBCS at some
point in time. Does that leave some pointers about how to handle this?
Also, there are some things that break in Java programs when there are
presuppositions on the character set being ASCII, and it turns out to be
EBCDIC.
Congratulations to Oliver!
René.
On 30 jul. 2011, at 02:02, Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Oliver Sims has accepted an invitation
to become a committer to the ooRexx project. Oliver has recently
been very busy submitting updates to the ooDialog documentation sample
both products here. Do we
know the most cost-efficient way to obtain this, and would these work across
all installers?
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 21 feb. 2012, at 15:35, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz wrote:
Just
Hi Mark
thanks for your quick answer.
On 21 feb. 2012, at 21:05, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
We have found that on many of the Linux versions, the installer
package needs to be built on the same Linux as it is to be installed
on. This is true on Debian versions, SuSE versions, etc. I.e., a
Hi David,
as I tried to say, it is not so bleak. The Rexx TSO team has a healthy list of
issues to work through and we might even get the Stream-I/O library on it.
I do share your opinion that there is nobody in the higher ups at IBM that sees
Rexx as the strategic language it is - in other
I see that it is served from the same machine as rexxla.org - It is is
maintained by David Ashley. I'll have a look if I can get to it and update it a
bit.
best regards,
René.
On 22 sep. 2012, at 17:56, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Rony G.
let me know, as I am in the process of finishing the programme
(presentation schedule) for these days. We are looking to a symposium that is
the largest in the past few years, with outside attendants.
best regards,
René Jansen
Any port above 1024 can be used (opened, written to) by non-root users. The PID
file location is the problem.
René.
On 18 apr. 2013, at 23:47, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:36 PM, CVBruce cvbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I may be wrong, but I thought that root
Hi Gil,
this was an accident; I corrected it some time ago (when David indicated he
could not find the time any more) but before I found out where the pages are
saved in version management, the server crashed, and old pages turned up again.
I agree that it should only provide a pointer to SF
It needs a developer certificate which RexxLA is trying to procure for ages
already. When we have this, the problem will be gone. I agree it does not look
optimal.
best regards,
René.
On 10 jul. 2013, at 20:23, Oliver Sims oliver.s...@simsassociates.co.uk
wrote:
I just downloaded ooRexx
Hi David,
that is excellent news. Way to go!
best regards,
René,
On 9 jan. 2014, at 02:47, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
All -
I updated the ooRexx web sites tonight. They now reflect updated
information and new copyright dates.
The biggest change is that they now are
that I work on the HTML text
Remove dead links and annotate foul ones
Have a nice weekend
Walter
Von: René Jansen [mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl]
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Jänner 2014 12:20
An: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Web Sites
Walter
just installed it on Linux-ARM (Raspbian) via apt-get install cmake, works
fine. Someone should check z/Linux.
René.
On 21 apr. 2014, at 18:28, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
It is available for
Linux x86
Mac OSX
Windows
AIX
IRIX
Most Linux distribution provide via
and I read that it can generate standard makefiles ... so that might also help.
René.
On 21 apr. 2014, at 18:28, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
It is available for
Linux x86
Mac OSX
Windows
AIX
IRIX
Most Linux distribution provide via their repositories. The source is
Hi Howard,
I would think, trying to build on Linux (if you haven't done so already) to
make sure you are prepared to see what happens during a build, which tools are
involved, what artifacts are produced and how these are linked together. Then,
look for ways to have this work on z/OS, and try
:18, Dan Carter gwcar...@ezlink.com wrote:
How do we expect to do this? Do we plan to run rxapi as a system task,
started at IPL?
-Original Message-
From: René Jansen [mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 19:27
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Cc
at 11:16 PM, Dan Carter gwcar...@ezlink.com wrote:
Well, then, does USS use of ooRexx preclude its use in the same manner as
Rexx is used by TSO? I do not use USS in normal everyday work.
-Original Message-
From: René Jansen [mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 20
to be a few svn clients. Does
anyone know which are good, bad, or ugly, so I don't have to waste time
finding out on my own?
Thanks.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:21 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
The source should be gotten through SourceForge and a svn client
to `RexxCreateInterpreter'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: [stackOverflow] Error 1 (ignored)
builder@tzvi-OptiPlex-360:~/orxbld$
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:00 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I almost exclusively use the command line version. All problems I ever had to
solve with svn
Jon,
you'll need Rony's statement that it is his work and he contributes it to open
source, to be precise. I'd suggest we have these statements on file, so e.g.
somewhere in version management, but in a directory somewhere out of sight so
we are not bothered too much with it.
best regards,
Hi David,
I think this would be a good addition to the range, and when provided with
access I would certainly use it. I hope the limited access aspect does not add
overhead to the build process.
Would it be possible to get a similar deal for Z (z/OS, z/Linux?) access?
best regards,
René
+0200, René Jansen wrote:
Hi David,
I think this would be a good addition to the range, and when provided
with access I would certainly use it. I hope the limited access aspect
does not add overhead to the build process.
Would it be possible to get a similar deal for Z (z/OS, z/Linux
I would advise to just open an issue in these cases. The text of it will be
sent over the list anyway, and the issue can be addressed right away - it saves
some actions.
best rgeards,
René.
On 5 sep. 2014, at 13:35, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at wrote:
The VALUE()-BIF can be
I have:
In file included from ./interpreter/classes/ArrayClass.cpp:52:
In file included from ./interpreter/runtime/RexxCore.h:183:
In file included from ./interpreter/memory/RexxMemory.hpp:49:
./interpreter/memory/MemoryStack.hpp:204:5: warning: control reaches end of
non-void function
Now it comes a lot further, but it stops at:
make: *** No rule to make target `interpreter/classes/StackClass.cpp', needed
by `librexx_la-StackClass.lo'. Stop.
best regards,
René.
On 20 sep. 2014, at 22:48, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I also discovered that my fix will have
nor anywhere in the build tree. I have no idea where this
comes from.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:38 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Now it comes a lot further, but it stops at:
make: *** No rule to make target `interpreter/classes/StackClass.cpp', needed
by `librexx_la
] Error 2
best regards,
René.
On 21 sep. 2014, at 13:03, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
That's supposed to happen automatically when the list updates, but it might
be a good idea to start from a clean state.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:59 AM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl
file. See if that fixes the
problem.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Generated with Cmake, now previous error gone, and I reach 70% of build. But
then:
/Users/rvjansen/apps/oorexx/oorexx-code-0/interpreter/platform/unix/ErrorMessages.cpp
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:07 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It did, but further down there is a new problem:
[ 76%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/rexx.dir/interpreter/platform/unix/TimeSupport.cpp.o
/Users/rvjansen/apps/oorexx/oorexx-code-0/interpreter/platform/unix/TimeSupport.cpp
we were first converting to cmake and the problem ended up being issues with
the config.h file not setting the right defines. If it appears hung in the
semaphore code, then this is probably the case again.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:04 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote
the
different PTHREAD_* defines. These should still end up the same as the
autotools generated version from the old build. If they don't, then David is
the expert on how that is generated.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:35 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
well, it did
I am just positioning for the z/OS port (having a running git, installing svn
client) and was hoping we could avoid leading edge language/compiler constructs
for some time.
Installations in the field are not as quickly upgraded. E.g. for NetRexx we are
still compiling release builds for JVM 1.5
Walter,
svn log
will show you commits and comments
svn log --verbose
will show you the changed files in addition to that.
also, have a look at svn diff which can show you the differences between
versions
best regards,
René.
On 10 okt. 2014, at 09:19, Walter Pachl
Windows and a
handful of Linux versions, if there is an alternative.
best regards,
René.
On 13 okt. 2014, at 16:58, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:45 AM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
David,
I appreciate the heads up, but I am wondering
David,
great! Thank you very much.
best regards,
René.
On 8 dec. 2014, at 01:59, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Killed two birds with one stone (or several svn updates).
The rxsock6 library now compiles cleanly on all platforms (including Mac
OSX and Windows). It is not
mailto:w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Will anyone else on your team need commit access? We might as well do
this all in one batch.
David Ashley
On 01/09/2015 11:03 AM, René Jansen wrote:
Hi David,
have an account - it is rvjansen. Of course I would be extremely cautious
with the repository
are allowed. We usually have an unknown developer submit a
few patches before we grant commit privileges but we may be able to bypass
that for you.
On 01/09/2015 10:34 AM, René Jansen wrote:
David,
At this point it would be really helpful to have commit rights to at least a
part
Hi Rick, David,
is any of you interested in presenting a talk at the symposium in Vienna?
best regards,
René Jansen.
On 11 mrt. 2015, at 10:59, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Just what I was looking for. Just could not find the correct place to look.
David Ashley
Bruce
Sent by Magic!
On Jun 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
hw: Raspberry Pi 2, 4* ~1Ghz ARM, 3.18 SMP PREEMPT armv71 GNU/Linux
(1) the installed cmake from the debian repository is 2.8.9 and too low for
ooRexx, git clone git://cmake.org/cmake.git
hw: Raspberry Pi 2, 4* ~1Ghz ARM, 3.18 SMP PREEMPT armv71 GNU/Linux
(1) the installed cmake from the debian repository is 2.8.9 and too low for
ooRexx, git clone git://cmake.org/cmake.git and building it sets you back half
an hour. There is no binary download.
(2) cmake 3.3.2 generates the
needs maintainer access to it.
SUSE
Erico Mendonça
Dedicated Support Engineer
(Work)+55 (61) 8594-9557
(Main) +55 (11) 3345-3900
(Personal) +55 (61) 9115-3256
emendo...@suse.com
René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl 03/06/15 13:31
Dan and others,
I am working
Hi Enrico,
Hmm, interesting...
Now I am missing less, but still two short.
Linking CXX executable bin/rexx
bin/librexx.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned long)'
bin/librexxapi.so.5.0.0: undefined reference to `operator new[](unsigned long)'
clang: error: linker command
Walter,
it means that someone on your mail server sent spam - 6 of them, and that your
particular (upc) server has been blacklisted. After 18 hours that ban will be
lifted. This all according to the link you provided.
best regards,
René.
On 8 jun. 2015, at 15:18, Walter Pachl
Dan,
In know this is nearly sacrilegious on this list, and let’s move it off to
somewhere else, but I need to tell you that NetRexx offers quite some
advantages in the JVM/J2EE world, by being Java. If you want to get to know web
containers, jdbc, messaging and jsp/javascript interaction, I
Hi Enrico,
thanks for the pointer. Did that, downloaded source and built cmake 3.2.3. Let
it generate a new makefile in a clean directory.
Exact same error though, (83% according to this cmake level), linking of
executable fails:
Scanning dependencies of target rexx_exe
[ 83%] Building CXX
The good news is, I can build the ooRexx documentation now in an automated way
with Jenkins (with help from Jean-Louis, altough I decided to build on Linux in
the end because of too much hassle on MacOSX - but I needed all his tips
anyway). So somewhere this weekend we will have nightly builds
I was wondering if someone already did find the time to try out transpiling the
ooRexx interpreter to JavaScript. There is a transpiler called Emscripten that
takes C/C++ source and compiles a neat form of JavaScript called asm.js, which
is a subset of it, and more importedly the preliminary
as their machine code.
Bruce
On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:40 AM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I was wondering if someone already did find the time to try out transpiling
the ooRexx interpreter to JavaScript. There is a transpiler called
Emscripten that takes C/C++ source and compiles a neat
Yes, I saw that yesterday a few times. Either the machine is just too small for
so much concurrent use (it is a 4*1Ghz, 1GB Raspberry after all) and / or the
process are leaking some memory. I will look if it needs moving to a larger
machine, or just ipl’ed more often, or maybe just needs to
Interesting and have it downloaded already.
To capture output on Linux and other, I would normally rxqueue the command and
loop through the queued lines.
“ls | rxqueue
line.0 = queued()
do l = 1 to line.0
parse pull line.l
say line.l
end
There might be more sophisticated ways.
Erich,
from here everything looks fine:
URL: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/main/trunk
Repository Root: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0
Repository UUID: 0b6cbdbe-3aab-466e-b73a-abd511dda0a2
Revision: 10933
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: jfaucher
Last
Hi Rony,
this is a nice on, thanks! I will speak to Jon about this; I see them as a very
viable alternative.
Thanks!
best regards,
René.
On 28 jun. 2015, at 13:46, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at wrote:
On 25.06.2015 17:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 25.06.2015 17:01, René
Jean-Louis, Erich,
I was wondering why there is a sudo in the makefile for the doc build. After
seeing the build fail more than often on the raspberry, I have moved it to a
larger machine (thanks, Ruurd!); which build oorexx in a jiffy, so I have good
hopes for the documentation. If that
ooRexx-4.2.0-1.ubuntu1310.i386.deb
ooRexx-4.2.0-1.ubuntu1304.x86_64.deb
...
How should she (or me) know which to use? :-(
Definitely NOT the windows version, I guess.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: René Jansen [mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl]
Gesendet
What about a plan to escape the sourceforge chaos?
Cheers,
Moritz
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:33 PM René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl
mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
As the build machine indicates, already 7 hours ago the svn was up again.
Let’s implement our plan to get all history from
SF has stated that all Git repositories would be restored first, and Subversion
repositories afterwards. ooRexx is in Subversion so will not be in the first
tranche. I would have appreciated a roadmap and estimate by SF but this has not
surfaced yet.
René.
On 23 jul. 2015, at 12:38, Bill
As the build machine indicates, already 7 hours ago the svn was up again.
Let’s implement our plan to get all history from it and have a safe copy on
github.
best regards,
René.
--
.
On 11 jul. 2015, at 09:05, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Jean-Louis,
yes, I saw that too - did not have time to act on it. The whole problem with
that makefile is that it does not do what makefiles are for: detemining the
minimal rebuild set based on target and source file
, Ruurd Idenburg ru...@idenburg.net wrote:
René
If I gotta do something, just let me know.
Ruurd
On 7-7-2015 14:33, René Jansen wrote:
Hi Jean-Louis,
thank you - let’s try.
best regards,
René.
On 6 jul. 2015, at 23:30, Jean-Louis Faucher jfaucher...@gmail.com
mailto:jfaucher
/Common_Content/
Ruurd
On 8-7-2015 11:20, René Jansen wrote:
Hi Ruurd,
I just wanted to ask you -
I think what is needed, is, from
/home/rexxla/workspace/oorexx-docs
issue the command:
sudo make brand
If that is done, the automatic build should go further than it does now
.
Jean Louis
2015-07-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Ruurd Idenburg ru...@idenburg.net
mailto:ru...@idenburg.net:
René
Done
Ruurd
On 8-7-2015 16:12, René Jansen wrote:
Hi Ruurd,
the problem with this is, that the rexxla user now cannot access the files,
as they now all are owned by root. So
in case of update of the oorexx brand. But that
happens rarely.
Jean Louis
2015-07-06 13:11 GMT+02:00 René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl
mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl:
Jean-Louis, Erich,
I was wondering why there is a sudo in the makefile for the doc build. After
seeing the build fail more than
Seems good, will look into that.
Thanks!
best regards,
René
> On 3 jan. 2016, at 21:53, Jack Woehr <jwo...@softwoehr.com> wrote:
>
> René Jansen wrote:
>> Jack,
>>
>> do you have a logon on an OpenBSD machine for me? We can make it work.
>>
>
>
Jack,
do you have a logon on an OpenBSD machine for me? We can make it work.
best regards,
René.
> On 31 dec. 2015, at 17:39, Jack Woehr wrote:
>
> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> In order to allow ooRexx to become even more popular, profiling/debugging
>> features on par
Dear fellow-developer,
I would like to start a concentrated effort to release ooRexx 5.00. Your help
is needed. Some time ago - how quickly time goes by - we spoke about this.
We need to have an inventory of the things to test and to fix before we do.
Last time, we made a division of OS’ses
ect admins will get an additional dashboard that will provide more
> in-depth details on why a file was flagged and how to address it. Project
> admins will also be able to submit a support request related to any issue
> detected by the scanners, and they’ll also be able to request a file
Which location are you getting these from, Gil?
René.
> On 15 jun. 2016, at 16:18, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
> Two of the 5.0.0 Alpha zip files have a malware flag on them. Any idea why?
>
> --
>
> Gil Barmwater
>
>
>
Hi Erico,
at the moment 5.00 is at svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/main/trunk
but we will soon branch for
release, after test have been run for the different platforms.
If you need commit access then Jon can probably arrange that. I am interested
in the SUSE build service, are you able
Hi Erico,
2) is very probably a broken gcc - I recognize the errors, and generally at
least 4.8 is needed to successfully compile and link.
Great progress!
René.
> On 21 Jun 2016, at 16:40, Erico Mendonca wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I placed ooRexx 5.0 (from the
Erico,
Ad 3) Debian Wheezy (arm) has cmake 2.8.9-1 in its repository, which is too low
- there is a command missing. For Wheezy I built cmake 3.5.2 from source.
Debian Jessie (arm) has cmake 3.0.2 which is fine for building ooRexx. So I
think the real prereq is 3.0.2. Enrico Sorichetti might
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo