Hi Dan,
This is wonderful! I, for one, would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks!
Gordana
Dan Wells d...@calvin.edu 7/26/2011 6:34 PM
Hello Gordana,
We are currently using LDAP to authenticate. I may be mistaken, but I believe
the code attached to the following message is still our current
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lori Bowen Ayre lori.a...@galecia.com wrote:
Yes, thanks for the clarification Dan. So, based on what you've said, I'm
updating the Evergreen feature summary some of us are working on to LDAP
supported. I've added it as feature SA537 (System Admin 537) in
Thank you! Will update SA537 to Not Supported!
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lori Bowen Ayre lori.a...@galecia.com
wrote:
Yes, thanks for the clarification Dan. So, based on what you've said,
I'm
updating the
As a middle ground I'd say it's Under Development and once accepted
into the core (or should it be when available in a release version) we
set it to Supported.
Cheers
On 07/27/2011 10:41 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Lori Bowen Ayrelori.a...@galecia.com wrote:
Yes,
Maybe we need to create new category called Patch Available or something
like that?
Lori
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Anoop Atre anoop.a...@mnsu.edu wrote:
As a middle ground I'd say it's Under Development and once accepted into
the core (or should it be when available in a release
Hello Lori,
There may be other cases where Patch Available would make sense, but at
least for this case, I think Under Development is our best bet (if such a
category already exists). The patch which is available is quite old, and is
really more of a starting point than something which can
Hi,
On 07/27/2011 12:27 PM, Dan Wells wrote:
There may be other cases where Patch Available would make sense, but at
least for this case, I think Under Development is our best bet (if such a
category already exists). The patch which is available is quite old, and is
really more of a starting
Hi,
We are trying to generate a report which will give us the total # of
circulations for a specific year for a specific call number range (total number
of circs of Laptops for 2009). I have tried to adapt some of the existing
templates however keep on getting blank spreadsheets.
Any advice
I've noticed the last few weeks that I'm getting a lot more traffic from the
Evergreen mailing list than from the Innovative Users Group list. While I
suppose it could be due to the fact that Innovative has lots of academic
customers it's summer, I like to think it's because there's just more
-Original Message-
We are trying to generate a report which will give us the
total # of circulations for a specific year for a specific
call number range (total number of circs of Laptops for
2009). I have tried to adapt some of the existing templates
however keep on getting
I would definitely support a pluggable authentication system, since
different communities may use different authentication systems.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 13:59, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote:
Hi,
On 07/27/2011 12:27 PM, Dan Wells wrote:
There may be other cases where Patch
Hi,
What Operator are you using to check the Call Number range, and what
range are you using for you Call Numbers
Base Filters:
Filter Field: Call #/Volume
Field transform: Raw Data
Operator: Contain matching substring
Because we chose the operator: contain matching substring we are
searching
-Original Message-
What Operator are you using to check the Call Number range,
and what range are you using for you Call Numbers
Base Filters:
Filter Field: Call #/Volume
Field transform: Raw Data
Operator: Contain matching substring
Because we chose the operator: contain
Filter Field: Call #/Volume
No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You
I am not sure what that error means. However, you could limit your search to
fields containing just 'LT' that should retrieve both LT and LT-. If that
doesn't work, you could change the operator to
Thanks - I will give that a try!
Geoff
Whalen, Liam liam.wha...@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca 7/27/2011 3:24 PM
-Original Message-
What Operator are you using to check the Call Number range,
and what range are you using for you Call Numbers
Base Filters:
Filter Field: Call #/Volume
Field
Filter Field: Call #/Volume
No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You
I think in this case you almost certainly want a field for
the call number that has the word Label in it. That'd be
straight-up text you could use a substring against.
Opps, yeah using the right
I support this idea as well. How could we move the idea forward enough
that I could shop the project around for other developers to help us with
it?
Lori
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM, David Fiander da...@fiander.info wrote:
I would definitely support a pluggable authentication system,
Hello Lori,
I have moved the technical aspects of this discussion over to the Dev list. I
fully expect we will be able to make this happen for 2.2. If you are not on
the Dev list, you can follow the discussion here:
Hi All,
I made some suggestions (below) for how to move a couple things around on
the wiki and no one commented. This is your last call to tell me not to do
it or to provide an even better idea...
Lori
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Lori Bowen Ayre lori.a...@galecia.comwrote:
Fantastic,
19 matches
Mail list logo
