C/W MARS, Inc.
>
> 508-755-3323, ext. 321 or ext. 1
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-
> boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Kathy Lussier
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:59 AM
> *To:* open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
> *S
Lussier
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:59 AM
To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Copy Count Display
Ah, ok! It looks like I was wrong in my earlier e-mail. The preferred library
does show in the counts, and I see what you're saying. The non-visible
: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Copy Count Display
Hi Joan,
My understanding is that the OPAC invisible copies should be included
in the copy counts in the client. I just did a brief test and found
that Lost copies were part of the copy count in the client, even
though it wasn't in the public catalog
Hi Joan,
My understanding is that the OPAC invisible copies should be included in
the copy counts in the client. I just did a brief test and found that
Lost copies were part of the copy count in the client, even though it
wasn't in the public catalog.
However, from reading your question, it
Hello,
We have some of our copy statuses such as Lost set to not be visible is the
public OPAC.
The copies are visible in the client. However on the title search results
screen the copies are not included in the copy count display for the library if
the search is done at the system/consortia
