Hi All...
Here goes a very simple question...
I have 12 clients, each one with several active iscsi sessions in
different targets.
In one of those clients, I have made a new partition in a given
device. The problem is that that new partition doesn't appear for all
the other clients, even after
erformance numbers from any other systems.
On Apr 13, 7:00 pm, jnantel wrote:
> Have you made any headway with this issue? I'm having a write issue
> that seems to share some similarities with yours.
>
> On Apr 13, 8:14 am, Gonçalo Borges wrote:
>
> > Hi...
>
> > &g
Hi...
> Is /apoio04/b1 a scsi/iscsi disk or is it LVM/DM/RAID on top of a
> iscsi/scsi disk?
/apoio04/ is a RAID1 of two disks accessible via iscsi (in the
following tests, I changed the mount point from /apoio04/ to /iscsi04-
lun0/ but they are exactly the same).
>
> Could you set the IO sc
Basically, I want to have an idea of the performance other admins are
getting... The hardware is not so important since I'm interested in
the order of magnitude of the performance rates...
On Apr 9, 10:22 am, Gonçalo Borges wrote:
> > What is the write performance if you do RAID0
> What is the write performance if you do RAID0 instead of RAID1?
Basically 30MB/s, i.e., twice the value I get in a RAID1.
> Also, you can use 'direct' I/O flag with "dd" command.
I'll try using this one!
Thanks and cheers
Goncalo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
Hi All...
Sorry, the following could be a little bit off topic...
Does any one has an idea of what is the expected performance for a IBM
DS 3300 system connected via open iSCSI? Using a RAID 1 with 2 disks,
I got the following numbers:
Sequential Write:
[r...@core12 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/ap
Hi...
> [r...@core26 ~]# multipath -ll
> > sda: checker msg is "rdac checker reports path is down"
> > iscsi06-apoio1 (3600a0b80003ad1e50f2e49ae6d3e) dm-0 IBM,VirtualDisk
> > [size=2.7T][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0]
>
> Very interesting: Out SAN system allows only 2048 GB of stora
>
>
>
> Sure.. but the normal rdac handler (that comes with the kernel) doesn't
> spit those errors. It looks as a proprietary module.
>
> If this is the proprietary module, what happens when you use the one that
> comes with
> the RHEL5U2 kernel?
>
This RDAC handler is suggested in
http://publib
>
> Where did you get this kernel? Is it from xen or from Red Hat? If it is
> from Red Hat? I have not seen some of the error messages in your log in
> the upstream or RHEL code.
>
>
This is a xen kernel but distributed in the Scientific Linux official
releases. Check, for example:
http://ftp.sci
> > Apr 1 11:44:13 core26 kernel: 122 [RAIDarray.mpp]iscsi06:1:0:1
> > Controller IO time expired. Delta 43701 secs
> > Apr 1 11:44:13 core26 kernel: 497 [RAIDarray.mpp]iscsi06:1:0:1 Failed
> > controller to 0. retry. vcmnd SN 458970 pdev H6:C0:T0:L1
> > 0x00/0x00/0x00 0x0002 mpp_status:2
>
>
Hi...
First of all, thanks for the reply.
After recovering my system, I tried to perform the tests you ask for
It might be good to know what scsiinfo (or similar) says about the size of
> the LUN
> at the start of yout tests. Likewise, show what "fdisk -l" tells about the
> partitions, and f
Dear open-iscsi gurus...
I'm working with an IBM DS3300 storage system accessible via open-
iscsi technology to many different clients. To give you the proper
context before describing my problem, I'll introduce my setup:
*** The target setup ***
- IBM DS3300 storage system as ISCSI target wit
12 matches
Mail list logo