29 марта 2011 г. 16:24 пользователь Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com написал:
Sounds interesting, so you are using also GPFS from the client side and have
GPFS work in its SAN mode?
No - GPFS is used at iSER target side - not on client (XEN virtualization node).
It's not the best solution,
Hello!
About redundancy: we have distributed filesystem (IBM GPFS), on
several nodes. Each node have it's own disks directly attachet to it -
there is no shared storage. So we use GPFS replication to store two
replicas of all data. Disks of virtual machines is actually a files on
GPFS. So, to
Степан Фёдоров wrote:
upfront, there's max_fmrs but its zero...). Is that 123 targets for
specific initiator a realistic requirement for your environment?
No. Realistic requirement is at least 256 targets per node.
Each target represents virtual machine in VDS hosting environment, so
we need
Stepan Fedorov wrote:
About redundancy: we have distributed filesystem (IBM GPFS), on several nodes.
Each node have it's own disks directly attachet to it - there is no shared
storage. So we use GPFS replication to store two replicas of all data. Disks of
virtual machines is actually a files
Align the iser code to use the actual maximal number of scsi commands
set for that session when allocating IB FMR resources instead of the
default max
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com
---
done against Linus tree of commit 036a98263a30930a329e7bb184d5e77f27358e40
compile tested
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Align the iser code to use the actual maximal number of scsi commands
set for that session when allocating IB FMR resources instead of the
default max
If this patch doesn't work out of the box and you want something simpler
just to make sure you can
On 03/28/2011 04:11 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Hi Mike, I don't see this message in the open-iscsi archive, I also
It might have shown up late. I had to manually ok messages.
didn't get it to a subscription I have in my gmail email account. I'm
suspecting this is b/c my sender address is now
Hi list,
Googlegroups just does not work well. To handle the spam problem I made
it so posting the list required that I manually ok a new users message.
This has resulted in people getting banned accidentally and mails
getting delayed by a couple days sometimes.
I would like to see if
