On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 20:21:35 +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> Following scenario would make scsi_device's iodone_cnt mismatch with
> iorequest_cnt even if there is no request on this device any more.
>
> 1. request timeout happened. If we do not retry the timeouted command,
>this command would be
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:11:05 +, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> There are two iscsi_set_param() functions individually defined
> in libiscsi.c and scsi_transport_iscsi.c which is confused.
>
> So rename the one in scsi_transport_iscsi.c to iscsi_if_set_param().
>
>
Applied to 6.2/scsi-queue, thanks!
On 11/30/22 5:05 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> On 11/30/22 12:08, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 11/30/22 1:53 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
>>> Have you already worked on the open-iscsi side of this? No reason for
>>> duplicate development.
>>
>> I think you missed his reply where he said he was missed the
>>
On 11/30/22 12:08, Mike Christie wrote:
On 11/30/22 1:53 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
Have you already worked on the open-iscsi side of this? No reason for duplicate
development.
I think you missed his reply where he said he was missed the
iscsid.safe_logout setting.
No, I saw that, but I
On 11/30/22 1:53 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> Have you already worked on the open-iscsi side of this? No reason for
> duplicate development.
I think you missed his reply where he said he was missed the
iscsid.safe_logout setting.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
[A much-reduced CC list, since my reply doesn't need wide distribution.]
On 11/23/22 09:27, Wenchao Hao wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 12:51 AM Lee Duncan wrote:
On 11/22/22 20:41, Wenchao Hao wrote:
On 2022/11/23 4:00, Lee Duncan wrote:
On 11/22/22 13:30, Wenchao Hao wrote:
There are 3
