Hi,
During the testing that I am doing, I run into a bottleneck when I run
I/O to more than 1 device at the same time.
In my current test configuration, I have the following setup:
Target server has MegaRaid with 2 RAID 1E devices, which are mapped
through lvm into large and small LUNs. 4 LUNs a
Hi,
(Sorry about the incomplete message due to my fat fingers)
I've searched through archives and lots of places, but have had no
success in finding the answer to the following conundrum:
- I set up 2 scsi targets using tgtd provided in scsi-target-utils and
put them on separate control
Hi,
I've searched through archives and lots of places, but have had no
success in finding the answer to the following conundrum:
- I set up 2 scsi targets using tgtd provided in scsi-target-utils and
put them on separate control-ports, so that I can keep backing-store
organized. The two instance
Hi,
During the testing that I am doing, I run into a bottleneck when I run
I/O to more than 1 device at the same time.
In my current test configuration, I have the following setup:
Target server has MegaRaid with 2 RAID 1E devices, which are mapped
through lvm into large and small LUNs. 4 LUNs a
On 08/03/2010 01:03 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Kun Huang schrieb am 03.08.2010 um 04:03 in Nachricht
:
make clean
would usually be removing all binaries introduced in
make install
No: "make clean" would remove the compiled or otherwise generated objects to leave only valuable
sources around.
On 08/03/2010 09:12 AM, Frank Jansen wrote:
Hi,
During the testing that I am doing, I run into a bottleneck when I run
I/O to more than 1 device at the same time.
In my current test configuration, I have the following setup:
Target server has MegaRaid with 2 RAID 1E devices, which are mapped
t
On 08/02/2010 02:42 PM, Jansen, Frank wrote:
Hi,
(Sorry about the incomplete message due to my fat fingers)
I've searched through archives and lots of places, but have had no
success in finding the answer to the following conundrum:
- I set up 2 scsi targets using tgtd provided in scsi-t
Mike,
that is a very good point. I will adjust the session queue depth first
to give this a try.
Thanks,
Frank
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 09:12 AM, Frank Jansen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During the testing that I am doing, I run into a bottleneck when I r
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:06 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Jansen, Frank
> Subject: Re: Using multiple ports question
>
> On 08/02/2010 02:42 PM, Jansen, Frank wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > (Sor
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:06 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Jansen, Frank
> Subject: Re: Using multiple ports question
>
> On 08/02/2010 02:42 PM, Jansen, Frank wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > (S
On 08/03/2010 02:29 PM, Jansen, Frank wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:06 PM
To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Cc: Jansen, Frank
Subject: Re: Using multiple ports question
On 08/02/2010 02:42 PM, Jansen, Frank w
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Christie [mailto:micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:42 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Jansen, Frank
> Subject: Re: Using multiple ports question
>
> On 08/03/2010 02:29 PM, Jansen, Frank wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original M
12 matches
Mail list logo
