bnx2i keeps losing the connection

2010-11-19 Thread Thomas
re details, but I'm rather new to iscsi and not really sure what information is relevant. - Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

Re: bnx2i keeps losing the connection

2010-11-20 Thread Thomas
E. Wai > Yes, I believe kernel 232 already has some of those fixes which resolved > our experience with the LEFTHAND target. OK, I will try the 232 kernel and see how it works. M. Christie > Do these errors start a little after the login? If so then it could be > due to the target or the initiat

Re: bnx2i keeps losing the connection

2010-11-20 Thread Thomas
Running with the 232 test kernel, the errors persist. /var/log/messages Nov 20 12:39:52 pxfs02 kernel: connection1:0: detected conn error (1011) Nov 20 12:39:52 pxfs02 iscsid: Kernel reported iSCSI connection 1:0 error (1011) state (3) Nov 20 12:39:54 pxfs02 kernel: bnx2i [04:00.00]: ISCSI_INIT p

Re: bnx2i keeps losing the connection

2010-11-22 Thread Thomas
On Nov 22, 9:36 am, Mike Christie wrote: > On 11/20/2010 02:53 PM, Thomas wrote: > > > Running with the 232 test kernel, the errors persist. > > > /var/log/messages > > Nov 20 12:39:52 pxfs02 kernel:  connection1:0: detected conn error > > (1011) >

Re: bnx2i keeps losing the connection

2010-11-22 Thread Thomas
I should point out that with the 232 kernel, these messages no longer get logged and hopefully the events do no longer occur. kernel: connection1:0: received itt 0 expected session age (c) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post

Re: bnx2i keeps losing the connection

2010-11-24 Thread Thomas
On Nov 24, 2:40 pm, Mike Christie wrote: > For the abort/remote close case, I would look in the target logs to > check if the target dropped the session. My apologies if this just fills the forum with useless logs, but here are logs from two services (dbd_store and dbd_manager) on the LeftHand

Re: iscsiadm -m iface + routing

2009-07-29 Thread julian thomas
Hello, Could you please send the mib,snmpwalk output of EqualLogic.If it supports SMI-s could you post the mof files for the same.Or is there any other way(CLI Interface)to monitor equallogic...? On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > > Ulrich Windl wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2009 at

change session portal

2010-10-18 Thread thomas wouters
nother would connect to 192.168.0.3. Is there anything we can do about this? We would like to share the load on these two nodes in stead of doing everything on one node. Don't hesitate to ask if you need more details on the setup, I'm just not that familiar with open-iscsi yet. Kind reg

Re: change session portal

2010-10-22 Thread thomas wouters
On Oct 19, 1:55 am, Mike Christie wrote: > On 10/18/2010 04:15 AM, thomas wouters wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > We have an HP Lefthand cluster with currently two storage nodes. > > This weekend we've done a maintenance on one of the nodes and noticed

Re: change session portal

2010-10-26 Thread thomas wouters
On Oct 22, 5:47 pm, thomas wouters wrote: > On Oct 19, 1:55 am, Mike Christie wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/18/2010 04:15 AM, thomas wouters wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We have an HP Lefthand cluster with currently two storage nodes. > > >

Problem with multiple root-users (UID=0)

2011-11-07 Thread Thomas Weichert
ipc.c solves my problem. Is there a chance to fix this issue just by checking if the user has sufficient rights, e.g. has uid=0, or is there any special reason for demanding a user named root? Thanks a lot Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Re: Problem with multiple root-users (UID=0)

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Weichert
he multiple login issue. I guess it would be enough just to check if the user that calls iscsiadm has uid=0 and not the name "root", because if uid=0 the user is definitively a root user with sufficient privileges. Kind regards Thomas -- You received this message because you are subs

Re: Antw: Re: Problem with multiple root-users (UID=0)

2011-11-14 Thread Thomas Weichert
to replace the check for username "root" to a check for uid 0. Kind regards Thomas On 11 Nov., 08:05, "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder whether "sudo" could solve your problem. > > Ulrich > > >>> Thomas Weichert schrieb am 10.

Re: Problem with multiple root-users (UID=0)

2011-11-28 Thread Thomas Weichert
care about any permission or security policies. So, thanks for explaining the technical insights about usernames and ids - however, this does not change the fact, that there is a bug in open-iscsi. Kind regards Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: some iscsi vendor has been hitting a crash

2013-11-03 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
S for production classes that I do not give myself, but will run the Nab's tree as soon as I give a VMware class myself in order to reproduce the issue and than track it down. Cheers, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi&q

Re: some iscsi vendor has been hitting a crash

2013-11-03 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hallo Nab, > Mike's talking about the WIP scsi-mq -> blk-mq initiator stack here, > and not specifically about anything related to target code. I see. Thanks. I'll keep you posted. Cheers, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

bind_src_by_address() is disabled?

2015-01-09 Thread Thomas Dwyer III
Hi folks, I spent some time browsing through this forum but I was unable to find an explanation for this comment referring to the disabled bind_src_by_address() function in io.c: *This is not supported for now, because it is not exactly what we want.* *It also turns out that targets will send p

Re: bind_src_by_address() is disabled?

2015-01-12 Thread Thomas Dwyer III
stie wrote: ... > > Thomas, let me know if your question was for functionality you needed or > just looking through the code and were curious. > > It's functionality that I really want. In fact, I'm here in this forum because strace on iscsid showed it was never calling bind(

[PATCH] Support binding a socket to a specific local IP address

2015-03-31 Thread Thomas Dwyer III
Currently, open-iscsi ignores iface.ipaddress whether or not iface.net_ifacename is configured. This can be problematic if/when a network interface is configured with multiple IP addresses and a target only allows connections from one of them. This patch adds support for iface.ipaddress, callin

Re: [PATCH] Support binding a socket to a specific local IP address

2015-04-06 Thread Thomas Dwyer III
Tom.III On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 10:44:46 AM UTC-7, Thomas Dwyer III wrote: > > Currently, open-iscsi ignores iface.ipaddress whether or not > iface.net_ifacename is configured. This can be problematic if/when a > network interface is configured with multiple IP addresses and a

Re: [PATCH] Support binding a socket to a specific local IP address

2015-04-06 Thread Thomas Dwyer III
Oops...I didn't notice before posting that the "Post Reply" button in google groups quoted the original message in this thread rather than the most recent message. :-( Tom.III On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 10:23:04 AM UTC-7, Thomas Dwyer III wrote: > > I wasn't able

Re: open-iscsi & iscsitarget no auto login

2013-01-22 Thread mr . joseph . thomas
I had a similar issue (assuming target and initiator are on the same host), the following got it to work for me. # 1 make sure the services for iscsi initiator, daemon, network, and target are started in the following order S09iscsi-target S10network S11iscsi S12iscsid # 2 /etc/fstab looks like