RE: Google Summer Of Code

Thanks for the links. I skimmed through them and put together http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2007#openjpa-streaming-lobs. Could someone in the know take a look at that and let me know if it looks right? Also, the code.google.com docs mention that any communication from the student to

Re: Google Summer Of Code

On 3/26/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the links. I skimmed through them and put together http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2007#openjpa-streaming-lobs. Could someone in the know take a look at that and let me know if it looks right? looks ok to me but more

[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-181) ClassCastException when executing bulk delete on an entity that owns a OneToOne with a Cascade.DELETE when DataCache is on

ClassCastException when executing bulk delete on an entity that owns a OneToOne with a Cascade.DELETE when DataCache is on -- Key: OPENJPA-181

[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-181) ClassCastException when executing bulk delete on an entity that owns a OneToOne with a Cascade.DELETE when DataCache is on

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Feinberg updated OPENJPA-181: -- Description: Given an entity class A which owns a OneToOne entity of class B, and

[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-182) db2 update lock syntax WITH isolation USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS

db2 update lock syntax WITH isolation USE AND KEEP UPDATE LOCKS -- Key: OPENJPA-182 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-182 Project: OpenJPA Issue Type: New

0.9.7 release

Hi guys, We've started preparing an incubator release for ODE and we're now using OpenJPA (pretty happily I should say). We can't use 0.9.6 as we need a couple of fixes from 0.9.7 so we've been using the snapshot so far. But as you know we won't be able to release with it (and generally speaking

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-172) DSRA9250E: Operation setTransactionIsolation is not allowed during a global transaction for Shareable Connections.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484226 ] Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-172: -- Ritika, The message you referenced... 0|true|0.9.6-incubating

Re: Shared classloader and subclasses

I've committed an equivalent patch to 0.9.7 in SVN revision 522623. Can you confirm whether this fixes your problem and, if so, close any CR you might have opened on this? This works for me :) Here's a patch for 0.9.6 source. I've gone for the simplest solution, but it might be improved

Re: OPEN-JPA and Toplink 2.0.XX

Well, you still need the implementation of the persistence api jar in your classpath. You can download the api jar by itself (without the toplink stuff) from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/ javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar Craig On Mar 26, 2007, at

RE: OPEN-JPA and Toplink 2.0.XX

No I have providerorg.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceProviderImpl/provider I don't have the API jar as I figured it is only empty stubs and of no value with OpenJPA-all jar Here is my Maven dependency section dependency groupIdaspectj/groupId

ID class: no public string or class + string constructor?

getting this error: The id type class com.sun.portal.pom.FooId specfied by persistent type class com.sun.portal.pom.Foo does not have a public string or class + string constructor. this error doesn't seem to correspond to any of the requirements of an ID class as defined in the spec. my

Re: ID class: no public string or class + string constructor?

Hi Jeff, It would be useful if you could include a code fragment and the @Id annotation for your class to diagnose this. Thanks, Craig On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:35 PM, jeff wrote: getting this error: The id type class com.sun.portal.pom.FooId specfied by persistent type class

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-172) DSRA9250E: Operation setTransactionIsolation is not allowed during a global transaction for Shareable Connections.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484280 ] Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-172: -- It sounds like WebSphere is working as expected. Since you are

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-168) sql optimize n rows query hint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484288 ] Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-168: - 2. I don't think we need a FetchConfiguration instance

[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-183) OpenJPAEntityManager large transaction APIs should take class arguments to narrow behavior

OpenJPAEntityManager large transaction APIs should take class arguments to narrow behavior -- Key: OPENJPA-183 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-183

RE: ID class: no public string or class + string constructor?

Sounds like an over-cautious validation message originating in OpenJPA's heritage -- the JDO spec (which Kodo implements on top of OpenJPA) places those requirements on the object IDs. If you could post the full stack trace and the relevant snippets from your domain model, it'd help the debugging