I looked at this patch and I think it's OK. but I'm not the gate keeper for
makefiles.
Can global keepers approve this patch?
2010/9/7 David Coakley
> Could a gatekeeper review the attached Makefile patch?
>
> The main purpose of the patch is to make it easier to build on Ubuntu
> systems, where
Author: chenr
Date: 2010-09-13 21:02:22 -0400 (Mon, 13 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 3342
Modified:
trunk/osprey-gcc-4.2.0/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/osprey-gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c
Log:
Fixed g++ builtin regression tests fails. (Bug 627)
Approved by Lai JianXin.
Modified: trunk/osprey-gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c
===
I have not heard from any reviewers for the Makefile patch I posted last week:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTinGXyhhWR_M39HnwB_xTMmhf232TavKidg33-xW%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=open64-devel
The libhugetlbfs build problem fixed by the patch is blocking others
so I'
Author: xiaohua_zhang
Date: 2010-09-13 15:57:48 -0400 (Mon, 13 Sep 2010)
New Revision: 3340
Modified:
trunk/osprey/common/com/mtypes.cxx
trunk/osprey/common/com/mtypes.h
trunk/osprey/wgen/wgen_decl.cxx
Log:
Bug 592: Assertion failure in file: osprey/../libspin/gspin-tel.h,
funct
It looks fine to me. Please commit it.
在 2010年9月6日 下午6:42，Chen, Rui (Roger, TSG-GDCC-SH) 写道：
> It’s not working for the previous bug.
>
>
>
> For bug 582, the assembler_name of newdecl is NULL, but not NULL for
> olddecl. In that case, we need to set the assembler_name of olddecl to NULL.
>
>
>
>
