I forgot to mention one intermediate step I had to perform, though I
don't know if it makes a difference. (Apologies, but it slipped my
mind!)
During sudo module-assistant auto-build openafs-modules the
setup failed about halfway through. I checked the error log and
found that the install script
* Ron Croonenberg [2006-01-28 12:46:17 -0500]:
I pxe booted the machines, used kickstart with the nfs way of installing
things including the OpenAFS
rpm's for the client install.
However, the newer versions of the OpenAFS rpms check to see what kernel they
are running on and if it
isn't
Ryan Propper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I forgot to mention one intermediate step I had to perform, though I
don't know if it makes a difference. (Apologies, but it slipped my mind!)
During sudo module-assistant auto-build openafs-modules the setup
failed about halfway through. I checked
Adam Megacz wrote:
To clarify, I need to point them at an installer on openafs.org that
they can double click (with a strong preference for being able to
accept all the default options). This is for Windows and MacOS users;
the Linux users know what they're doing (I hope).
Considering that
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor is it what we want you to do.
If bandwidth is a concern I can certainly arrange to host a mirror of
the openafs downloads. We have plenty of bandwidth here.
- a
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[ As a side note, I finally got this whole thing working by creating the ]
[ bogus AFSDB entry mentioned earlier. But I'd like to continue this ]
[ discussion because I think the use case I've set up is a very valuable ]
[ one. I'm currently working on a detailed guide on how to set up
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Adam Megacz wrote:
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor is it what we want you to do.
If bandwidth is a concern I can certainly arrange to host a mirror of
the openafs downloads. We have plenty of bandwidth here.
You have failed to understand. He's saying
On Jan 29, 2006, at 6:19 , Adam Megacz wrote:
I think the confusion comes from the fact that AFS was originally a
commercial software program that you had to pay a huge amount of money
for. Therefore, every user had exactly one site -- the organization
that paid for his/her copy. It was
(sorry if this appears twice)
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, no. AFS was originally developed to serve the needs of Carnegie
Mellon University, which still has multiple cells. IBM helped fund
its development (much as DEC and others helped fund MIT's Project
Athena
(sorry if this appears twice)
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, no. AFS was originally developed to serve the needs of Carnegie
Mellon University, which still has multiple cells. IBM helped fund
its development (much as DEC and others helped fund MIT's Project
Athena
Adam Megacz wrote:
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor is it what we want you to do.
If bandwidth is a concern I can certainly arrange to host a mirror of
the openafs downloads. We have plenty of bandwidth here.
- a
Its not a question of bandwidth. I'm sure that MIT and CMU
Adam Megacz wrote:
I argue that, in the post-Transarc era, there are a large number of
situations where OpenAFS is useful for which no coherent/meaningful
definition of site exists (cell, of course, is still well-defined).
For 99% of users, they install OpenAFS to access the data in one cell.
Adam Megacz wrote:
I would actually love to contribute as such a volunteer (as I have
done for gcc and other projects), but my desire to do so has been
totally nuked by the sorts of assumptions ingrained in those who
decide which contributions get accepted and which don't. The gcc
project
On Sunday, January 29, 2006 06:13:29 PM -0800 Jeffrey Altman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Megacz wrote:
I argue that, in the post-Transarc era, there are a large number of
situations where OpenAFS is useful for which no coherent/meaningful
definition of site exists (cell, of course, is
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
The problem, Jeff, is that you have not quite gotten over the antiquated
notion of a site in which a central administrator exerts complete
control over all the services and all the clients.
Jeff:
I don't believe that any service provider has complete control over
Ron Croonenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
I'm not sure what you mean.. The RPM doesn't care about the RUNNING
kernel.. It /does/ care about having 'kernel = version where
version is the kernel version the RPM was built against.
Is there a way around it ?
Um, maybe you could just
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I have said is that before I as a gatekeeper would accept code
that makes fundamental changes to the way authentication and
authorization works,
It's cool, I understand this even if I don't agree with it.
I (grudgingly) revived this point
Side note: Jeff H's description of my situation is exactly correct,
down to the last detail.
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam is the administrator of his cell and until he can convince the
powers that be at Berkeley to distribute configuration data for him
This is the strange
18 matches
Mail list logo
