Hi,
I don't know if this is at all related, but I vaguely recall having had
a similar problem. It turned out that the cell name string in
/etc/openafs/ThisCell, as made by the initial installation config,
didn't have a line termination, which made the upgrade config script
choke when trying to
-Original Message-
From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Deason
Sent: 03 October 2013 19:17
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: [ Openafs : cache on zfs ]
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:34:27 +0200
nicolas
-Original Message-
From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Deason
Sent: 03 October 2013 19:17
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: [ Openafs : cache on zfs ]
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:34:27 +0200
nicolas
[ For those running ext3/ext4, a question further down for you as ]
[ well! ]
We're still a 100% Solaris + ZFS file server shop. We're EOLing
our Sun SPARC hardware (with tears in our eyes) this year.
Before we spend a significant amount
On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Jeff Blaine jbla...@kickflop.net
wrote:
* If not, and you looked into it, what stopped you?
We stopped because of the memory fragmentation issue. ZFS will use ~twice the
arc limit you set, and (in my experience) if you don't set the it wisely (e.g.
20-25% total
Am Donnerstag 03 Oktober 2013, 19:34:27 schrieb nicolas prochazka:
after some tests to use zfs as afs cache,
linux kernel tells :
BUG : soft lockup - CPU0 stuck for 23s ! [ afs_cachetrim:2908]
Any ideas are welcome,
You could put the cache on a normal Linux FS inside a ZVOL. See
Am Freitag 04 Oktober 2013, 10:31:47 schrieb Jeff Blaine:
We're still a 100% Solaris + ZFS file server shop. We're EOLing
our Sun SPARC hardware (with tears in our eyes) this year.
Before we spend a significant amount of time evaluating this, I
figured I'd ask first. Any brief response
-Original Message-
From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Blaine
Sent: 04 October 2013 15:32
To: OpenAFS
Subject: [OpenAFS] ZFS-on-Linux on production fileservers?
[ For those running ext3/ext4, a question further down for
Am Freitag 04 Oktober 2013, 16:51:28 schrieb mi...@task.gda.pl:
See my presentation about it last year.
Link?
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinri...@altum.de
Tel: +49 (0)2471 209385 | Mobil: +49 (0)176 34473913
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Jabber: dirk.heinri...@altum.de
On Oct 4, 2013, at 18:08 , Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Freitag 04 Oktober 2013, 16:51:28 schrieb mi...@task.gda.pl:
See my presentation about it last year.
Link?
http://conferences.inf.ed.ac.uk/eakc2012/
--
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
-Original Message-
From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Heinrichs
Sent: 04 October 2013 17:08
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] ZFS-on-Linux on production fileservers?
Am Freitag 04 Oktober 2013,
Am Freitag 04 Oktober 2013, 17:18:24 schrieb mi...@task.gda.pl:
http://conferences.inf.ed.ac.uk/eakc2012/slides/AFS_on_Solaris_ZFS.pdf
Thanks a lot.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinri...@altum.de
Tel: +49 (0)2471 209385 | Mobil: +49 (0)176 34473913
GPG Public Key C2E467BB |
Torbjörn Moa m...@fysik.su.se writes:
I don't know if this is at all related, but I vaguely recall having had
a similar problem. It turned out that the cell name string in
/etc/openafs/ThisCell, as made by the initial installation config,
didn't have a line termination, which made the upgrade
FWIW: I'm using SmartOS (USB device boot) to boot a smart machine (aka
a zone) with OpenAFS. Giving up any large amount of space for boot
devices on my fileservers seems rather stupid. This has been in
production for several months now.
Using Debian + zfsonlinux with some success for other
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:30:04 -0700
Russ Allbery r...@stanford.edu wrote:
Well, the comment indicates that I knew about this problem at some
point, but I see no sign of actually doing what the comment says it
should be doing. On the other hand, I can't figure out why that read
would fail when
Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net writes:
Russ Allbery r...@stanford.edu wrote:
Well, the comment indicates that I knew about this problem at some
point, but I see no sign of actually doing what the comment says it
should be doing. On the other hand, I can't figure out why that read
* Are you using ZFS-on-Linux in production for file servers?
Yes.
* If not, and you looked into it, what stopped you?
Long there was fear and doubt, but the (not) quality of HW-Raid
solutions and hassle of Linux SW-Raid convinced us that it could not
be worse with ZFS.
* If you are, how is
All,
we are seeing some weird issues with the windows client (1.7.26, but hat
also seen that with previous 1.7 versions). Often, when attempting to
write data, my users get a popup box complaining about insufficient
space in the target directory. In those cases, writing the data to the
RW
File a bug report with Microsoft if the problem is experienced when
using the explorer shell or applications relying upon the shell api for
file access.
This is a known bug in the explorer shell and Microsoft has been working
on it for more than six months. As with all Windows bugs, a fix is
19 matches
Mail list logo
