Re: Seeking clarification regarding Assumed value

> On 8 Oct 2018, at 23:09, Peter Gummer wrote: > > ...Attached to this email is the CLUSTER that Ian attached to the Jira issue. Hmmm, I don’t think this mailing list accepts attachments. Here is the CLUSTER as ADL. Peter archetype (adl_version=1.4) op

Re: Seeking clarification regarding Assumed value

Hi Heather,I think I've tracked down why this was changed in the Ocean Archetype Editor. It seems to be this change on 6th May 2012: https://github.com/openEHR/arch_ed-dotnet/commit/bb50d16ad44e910d717c9e75e967fe1b1af36c46 EDT-567: Allow assumed value to be set on any data, not just on patient

Re: How to define transitions in the ISM

Hi Ivar, On 27 Jul 2018, at 18:02, Ivar Yrke wrote: > > I actually did look into the code. After some struggling into the VB code > (which isn’t my strong side) I eventually found that the problem also went > into the underlying java-classes (which is not my strong side either). I >

Re: How to define transitions in the ISM

Hi Ivar and Pablo, Reading this, I had the vague recollection that old versions of Archetype Editor used to have a stab at supporting the transition, but that I had removed it because it didn’t actually work. A quick search of github … and here’s the relevant commit, more than five years ago:

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

On 17 Mar 2017, at 22:39, Bert Verhees wrote: > > The several countries have independent organizations, and the overall > organization cannot enforce a common terminology. There are two terminologies > in this case, and those two terminologies cannot be mapped easily,

Multiple translators

Sebastian Garde wrote: There is also an older related issue on the specs tracker https://openehr.atlassian.net/browse/SPECPR-24 This issue highlights some potential problems as well, but doesn't have a clear solution yet. I believe it should be considered at the same time. Hmmm, yes, 2009 ...

Issue (probably known) with ADL Workbench

Ian McNicoll wrote: Are you using the openEHR or Ocean version of the archetype editor? That would make no difference, Ian. The same ADL is generated by openEHR and Ocean Archetype Editors. I'm sure that the problem is that Pablo must be using a very old version of ADL Workbench. Peter

[openEHR-announce] ADL 1.5 Workbench beta 4 release - major new features

Seref Arikan wrote: Thanks for all the hard work. I'll give it a spin under Linux and let you know how it goes. If I had a Mac (cough), I'd do the same for the sugar coated BSD ;) There is not much sugar on the Mac build unfortunately, Seref, because it doesn't use Cocoa. The Mac build

Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?

segunodujebe at yahoo.com wrote: The Editor is free software, I am not sure if it qualifies as open source. Yes, the Archetype Editor is definitely open source. I gave the link to its source in my earlier reply: http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge_tools_dotnet/TRUNK/ArchetypeEditor -

Slot constraints.

Richard Andersson wrote: What does it mean when a slot is constrained via the Include/Exclude? E.g. if I make an observation with a cluster-slot, add a cluster to the Include and do nothing in the Exclude. Is it constrained that only the cluster added to Include is possible to use in the