Age and named quantities

conceive stuff. What do others think? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 704 bytes Desc: not available URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20050201

Libre Software Meeting for Medicine, July 5-9, 2005, at Dijon, France

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20050201/5f3943d9/attachment.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LSM2005 CALL for Abstracts.pdf Type

CR-000024 - Revert meaning to String in LOCATABLE nodes in openEHR data

For us it doesn't matter. It will have some pretty big consequences for our implmentation, since we currently assume a DVText everywhere in the code. Since we are behind on the specs anyway (meaning not really keeping up), this won't yet be integrated, untill we have a go at catching up with

openEHR change management

Martin van den Bemt wrote: For us it doesn't matter. It will have some pretty big consequences for our implmentation, since we currently assume a DVText everywhere in the code. Since we are behind on the specs anyway (meaning not really keeping up), this won't yet be integrated, untill we

Age and named quantities

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:00:39AM +0930, Sam Heard wrote: Age is time after birth - we are not going to change that. That's fine ... now for the second ... We have agreed that we need to record one more date in the demographic model - which is 'approximate date of conception', or

proposal for gathering community knowledge

On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 04:32:07PM +, Thomas Beale wrote: Thomas, just noted that this nice suggestion of your has not evoked a response so far ... opening the batting here ;-) What it comes down to is this. Interesting, sometimes long discussions occur about topics like

Age and named quantities

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20050201/cf64f32b/attachment.html

proposal for gathering community knowledge

USM Bish wrote: [rest snipped] o The proposal of summarising important discussions is nice. It is also quite unique. o Implementation would be a hurdle, because of the following :- a) You need the co-ordinating agency first, and then the core group needs to set the ball