Templates - should we record which are used?

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051020/dc94bc9d/attachment.html

Templates - should we record which are used?

Dear Sam, We have been discussing the issue of templates and whether we keep an identifier of a template in the data. My concern has been that this ID might be seen as an absolute constraint on the data, whereas the precedence of constraint must be: knowledge models (reference models as

Templates - should we record which are used?

Christian Heller wrote: Dear Sam, We have been discussing the issue of templates and whether we keep an identifier of a template in the data. My concern has been that this ID might be seen as an absolute constraint on the data, whereas the precedence of constraint must be: knowledge

openEHR XML-schema Questions

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051020/f8301f44/attachment.html

Templates - should we record which are used?

/20051020/8b6a3de3/attachment.html

openEHR XML-schema Questions

In my opinion the best design is to have one schema per information model. This facilitate a logical division of the designed types and to keept in mind the reference model. The use of namespaces is a good idea to clarify thinks (I belive). To use this philosophy for representing RM in OWL gives

Templates - should we record which are used?

Hi Thomas, well, that is one design approach, but it is not the one that we use in openEHR. In openEHR, the archetypes are seen as part of the ontology of information (distinct from ontologies of the real world like snomed-ct etc). We use them extensively in their own right. We don't I