Erik,
I don't see the difference. The same approach can be used with different
query parameters and terminology identifiers. We just need to find a way to
uniquely identify local terminology ids, some sort of namespacing mechanism
such as a terminology source organisation UID should do the trick.
>
> *
> *
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081202/48f57d98/attachment.html>
Ian McNicoll wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> According to Support_IM 5.3.2
>
> "Valid identifiers that can be used for this attribute for
> terminologies include but are not limited to the
> following:
> ? "openehr"
> ? "centc251"
> ? an identifier value from the first column of the US National Library
>
We unfortunately recently uploaded an installer for the specialisation
version of the ADL Workbench that contained a bug which makes it hang
for locales other than "en" locales. Anyone who has downloaded this
please download the latest version now there instead (see
http://www.openehr.org/svn/
xt part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081202/d2368708/attachment.html>
do this -
>
> umls(2008AA)::123456 etc
>
>
> - thomas beale
>
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081202/ce7fefb1/attachment.html>
Hi,
Some days after 2008-12-09 IHTSDO probably release a draft of a
compositional grammar for SNOMED CT expressions which can be used for
terminology bindings to SNOMED CT. This draft can probably be a basis for
discussions of terminology bindings.
Greetings,
Mikael
-Origin
Hi!
I know that there are suggestions for defining terminology
queries/subset-selections using URIs. We discussed this a bit in a
conference paper that was selected for republication in BMC:
"Integration of tools for binding archetypes to SNOMED CT" freely
available at http://www.biomedcentral.com
Hi Erik,
As you know Ocean has been doing a lot of work making terminology and
openEHR Archetype work. Hugh Grady is the best to describe this but in
summary we are proposing the use of terminology URIs for bindings.
Bindings can reference a whole terminology, a branch of a terminology
hierarchy
9 matches
Mail list logo
