Feedback on an archetype governance issue please

HI Colin thanks. The problem is that this makes a lot of sense in Australia, but much less in, e.g. USA/Canada I can't speak to how it would work in UK or other non-english speaking countries. Grahame On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Colin Sutton wrote: > Hi Grahame, > > I was only suggesting

Feedback on an archetype governance issue please

Hi Grahame, I was only suggesting not to use the term 'Laboratory results' , since information from other devices could match the pattern: the accepted usage of 'Pathology' is better, in my opinion; I agree that separate constructs are more useful for imaging - and DNA results. regards, Colin

Feedback on an archetype governance issue please

hi Colin The trouble with "diagnostic tests" is that this also includes other things that are contained in a different archetype - Imaging - and also other things for which the requirements were not in our scope, and therefore I'd have no confidence in it's use for them. Note that the imaging arc

Feedback on an archetype governance issue please

'Histopathology test results' should by definition only include cell/tissue sample diagnostics, which would exclude molecular tests. As measurement devices become available outside the laboratory, simpler to operate and cheaper, 'Laboratory results' become a subset of diagnostic tests. 'Patholo

Feedback on an archetype governance issue please

c decisions where there is real >> impact on implementers, we want to develop and apply governance principles >> systematically, and at the same time we have a responsibility to set these >> models up to be as rigorous and semantically sensible as we can, while we >> can. We know that over time, we will have to make compromises ? the art (or >> science) is working out how much compromise and when! >> >> Many thanks >> >> Heather and Ian >> >> >> Dr Heather Leslie >> MBBS FRACGP FACHI >> Director of Clinical Modelling >> Ocean Informatics >> Phone (Aust) +61 (0)418 966 670 >> Skype - heatherleslie >> Twitter - @omowizard >> >> ___ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > ___ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120728/b5cc9bc7/attachment-0001.html>