Seref Arikan wrote:
My attempts to check out Ocean's archetype editor fail with a request
for a username/password for svn.oceaninformatics.com
http://svn.oceaninformatics.com
I can omit externals in my svn client (should I?), however when I do
that only beryllium directory in releases
Adam Flinton wrote:
Equally if a text editor opens an ADL, assumes UTF-8 puts on a BOM
then the Archetype editor dies ...
I assume you mean the Java Archetype Editor, Adam. The Ocean Archetype
Editor accepts ADL files with or without the BOM.
There are pros and cons whether tools should
P?ria Kashfi wrote:
Thank you for the link, but it seems that there's no implementation
yet( I mean in Archetype editor). I don't have this type in my editor
Yes, DV_MULTIMEDIA is in the Ocean Archetype Editor.
On the Definition tab, click the big plus [+] button. A menu pops up.
Select
Thomas Beale wrote:
I also agree with Adam. A regex should be able to be used over a
population of strings (identifiers in this case) and have the effect of
filtering out what you want. ...
Practically speaking this does not change the specifications, but I
suspect we should put some
Thomas Beale wrote:
archetype_id: qualified_rm_entity ?.? domain_concept ?.? version_id
qualified_rm_entity: rm_originator ?-? rm_name ?-? rm_entity
rm_originator: V_NAME
rm_name: V_NAME
rm_entity: V_NAME
domain_concept: concept_name { ?-? specialisation }
concept_name: V_NAME
Sam Heard wrote:
... I do not think we want 1.1.1 unless people can come up with a
sensible reason to have three levels. I can't think of any benefit.
In that case the production rule would be simpler:
'v' V_NONZERO_DIGIT { V_DIGIT } [ '.' V_DIGIT { V_DIGIT } ]
V_DIGIT: [0-9]
sam.heard signatureOops, Ian and Sam, looks like I misinterpreted Ian's
question. I retract my earlier reply
Yes, this is an interesting question Ian!
- Peter
From: Sam Heard
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:00 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Cc: Peter Gummer
Subject: Re
Thomas Beale wrote:
... They used to be accepted. (An example would be blood_type-o.) ...
... I would suggest that
blood_type-o could not be a sensible archetype name from a clinical
point of view, because 'o' is not a specialisation of the blood type
reporting concept ...
I think we would
Thomas Beale wrote:
Tim Cook wrote:
For example in IArchetype (the Archetype interface) I define ontology as
an ArchetypeOntology type. Now Archetype of course is supposed to
implement IArchetype. IArchetypeOntology defines parentArchetype as an
Archetype type. This creates a circular
Adam Flinton wrote:
I am assuming allow then deny i.e. include all, exclude all = include all.
Otherwise...exclude all becomes somewhere between pointless dangerous.
I think of it in terms of items moving back and forth between an include
list and an exclude list.
* Initially, the slot is
Heath Frankel wrote:
[openEHR-EHR-COMPOSITION.encounter.v1*] (or perhaps more correctly
[openEHR-EHR-COMPOSITION.encounter.v1.*], where the dot means any
character
not the version delimiter) and [openEHR-EHR-COMPOSITION.encounter.v\d+]
are
different. The first allows all revisions of .v1
Tim Cook wrote:
Okay. So we now have a circular reference issue. Again, I do not
understand the value of this in any implementation.
Although ARCHETYPE - ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY isn't exactly a case of the
Composite design pattern, nonetheless this quote from the GoF Design
Patterns book
Hi Tim,
Regardless of whether a version control system is used, when the person in
charge of child class B becomes aware that something has changed in parent
class A, we don't require all of those changes to be copied manually from A
to B.
That is the situation at the moment with .adl files.
Tim Cook wrote:
First of all; an ontology instance cannot (should not) exist outside of
an archetype instance. Therefore it is obvious which archetype it
belongs with.
I don't understand how it would be obvious, Tim. You would have to search
through all of the archetypes somehow in
Rong Chen wrote:
In the Java implementation, the reference to parent is not used
so far, both in the case of ARCHETYPE/ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY
and C_OBJECT/C_ATTRIBUTE.
Actually, Rong, I note with surprise that our Eiffel implementation doesn't
even have ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY.parent_archetype.
-
Tim Cook wrote (hidden away inside a text attachment):
I also note that some of the ADL files are intended to be tests. My
feeling is that some of these have been around for some time and may not
be truly 'test' files. Should they be removed or updated? I vote for
updated. A set of really
Bert Verhees wrote:
There is only one important step, that is, what is a good way to connect
the data to the archetypes. Is this dADL, or better XML, or other means.
Are there any ideas?
Does this help?
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=786487
- Peter
Adam Flinton wrote:
I have already noted how using text children of an element to use a
value vs a std value attribute in the archetype xml inflates the file
sizes.
A
Some value
/A
A value=Some value/
And Heath Frankel replied:
Your example here is contrary to your statement,
Thomas Beale wrote:
... In our own EHR
product we have had to resort to various kinds of compression, which
impact on performance, and we have to have larger disc arrays than would
be needed if the data were represented in a more efficient way. Our
engineers are currently looking at replacing
sam.heard signatureSam Heard wrote:
What we need is an XSL Script that consumes XML archetypes ...
Hi Sam,
XSLT is ok in small doses, but it becomes unmaintainable for anything
complex. Other approaches share the advantages claimed at
Bert Verhees wrote:
In my opinion, the line numbers should not be embedded in the text as
they
are now, but they should sit separately in a margin. ...
You are right, but maybe that is too much trouble, the Eiffel environment
does, maybe, not have advanced GUI-components which have
this
Bert Verhees wrote:
A small issue (but maybe hard to repair), when copy and pasting the
source, it also copies the line-umbers, good would be an option for
removing the line-numbers.
I had that wish too, Bert, a few weeks ago.
In my opinion, the line numbers should not be embedded in the text
I have just created a log-in for myself on the wiki. I entered my email
address where requested.
Browsing to the People Directory, however, I see that my email address is
there for everyone to see. I can browse to it even if I'm not logged in.
Isn't this a spam hazard? As a precaution, I've
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
