On 11/11/2017 18:28, Bert Verhees wrote:
Well done, Gavin,
I hope there will be the needed activity. It may, for some people, being
more ad hoc possible to ask questions on Stackoverflow, instead of on
one of the mailing lists. We already had once a discussion about OpenEhr
on StackOverflow,
Hi all,
Today I created a tag on Stackoverflow for openEHR
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/openehr
For it to persist over time there needs to be sufficent level of
activity involving openehr tagged questions.
enjoy!
Gavin Brelstaff
CRS4 Sardinia
On 29/04/2016 18:02, Ian McNicoll wrote:
Hi Bert,
"I think that every leaf-node in an Archetype can be encoded in SNOMED,
don't you think?"
I'm afraid not even close, especially when you take into account the
changes in the meaning of datapoints that apply when used in differing
contexts. When
Re: Ontology archetype codes
aren't we, here, in the realms of Descriptive v. Prescriptive Grammar?
http://grammar.about.com/od/basicsentencegrammar/f/descpresgrammar.htm
*Descriptive* obliges you to change whenever the language seems to.
*Prescriptive* obliges you to try to hold the language
On 15/04/2013 16:15, Bert Verhees wrote:
On 04/15/2013 03:37 PM, Grahame Grieve wrote:
big risk - it's a combination of how likely it is, and how bad it is
if they are.
Generally, current location, current medication lists, summary lists
are things where contention can happen. Quite often,
On 01/02/2012 09:13, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:10, Ian McNicoll
Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
1. Add some sort of persistence/ repository back-end for archetypes
and associated documentation e.g Github and/ or Dropbox. There is a
very nice Python
On 16/09/2011 01:09, Timothy Cook wrote:
Well, maybe you should consider real open source tools.
does git http://git-scm.com/
have any place in the discussion?
As a version control/repository system it has the advantage
that it's designed to combat bi-trot - while being
nicely distributive.
On 23/03/2011 11:54, Diego Bosc? wrote:
I was saying that because some of the conditions Thomas said are
really clinical knowledge. I want to be able to express that one value
should be always greater than another, or that a score value of a
scale (norton, barthel...) is the addition of other
The blog entry by Ogbujis linked below may be of solace to some of us -
it includes this conclusion..
I also think much of the risk aversion associated with the atmosphere I
found myself ... in large institutions contributes to why the very
evident opportunities in leveraging rich web
On 26/11/2010 16:48, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi all!
We had a poster titled REST Based Services and Storage Interfaces for
openEHR Implementations at a Swedish conference in September. I have
now finally gotten around to reformatting it to be readable when read
on screen or printed as a
On 03/06/2010 00:18, Tim Cook wrote:
Thanks for that research and organization work Erik.
Whether Sam (as a Board member) or anyone else has presented any
'strong arguments' to the other Board members is an unknown and
frankly, I think, is irrelevant.
Over the past decade, we can probably
On 08-Mar-10 11:25, Thomas Beale wrote:
A new draft is now up of the AOM 1.5 at
http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/adl1.5.pdf
. This draft adds in group construct, providing the same capability as
XML schema choice/sequence/group for ordering elements
On 11-Mar-10 12:59, Stef Verlinden wrote:
For those of you interested in the 'problems' within Snomed as an ontology,
here (http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3465/version/1) you can find a
good and recent article describing them. This doesn't mean we shouldn't use
Snomed, but knowing
Hi Ron Rong Chen an all:
The URL to the terminology xml file is:
http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_java/TRUNK/mini-termserv/src/main/resources/openehr_terminology_en.xml
Possible import bugs in this file appear beneath line 580:
group name=participation mode
Everywhere the the
I wonder if anyone has created themselves a syntax highlight file
for use with Notepad++
http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm
and would be willing to share it?
Gavin Brelstaff CRS4
Thomas Beale wrote:
To clarify one thing: UI structures have to be based on templates, which are
essentially specific 'data set' definitions, not archetypes, which
standardise
all content irrespective of any particular use. But I agree with the point
that
any such artefact cannot be
Heather Leslie wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just had our 250th user register in the Clinical Knowledge Manager today!
Seems like a pretty good milestone to share and celebrate to me!
Seem more user stats http://openehr.org/knowledge/#userstatistics here: 95
reviewers, 24 translators, 42
Hi Seref,
Seref Arikan wrote:
I've written an initial set of things here :
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/projects/Technology+and+architecture+challenges+in+UI+implementation.
based on Opereffa, but I'd really like to hear how others are tackling UI
layer.
I'm a little bit worried since
Hi
I'm considering how I might constrain layout in an EHR GUI depending
on constraint made in an adl file.
cADL assertions look a plausible way to go.
But I don't see anyone using the invariant keyword in their ADL files
- has anyone got any practical examples of doing so?
Any help gratefully
Hugh Leslie wrote:
Who would ever have thought that a technician would have such poetry in
their
soul - perhaps there is hope for semantic interoperability after all... :)
Who does understand semantic interoperability?
The beauty of human interaction is that we can
get
Hugh Leslie wrote:
Who would ever have thought that a technician would have such poetry in
their
soul - perhaps there is hope for semantic interoperability after all... :)
Who does understand semantic interoperability?
The beauty of human interaction is that we can
get
21 matches
Mail list logo
