An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061113/55d6399d/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
Hi Matiass,
Mattias Forss wrote:
Archetype A and archetype B will have 'correct archetype paths
according to where the fragment was put', but will they refer to the
same paths? When I talked about data I meant what was stored in the
EHR system and when I talked about values I meant what
2006/11/13, Rong Chen rong.acode at gmail.com:
I am not sure if it's safe to allow cross-use of internal archetype nodes
for data entering. A better approach in my view is to separate the common
archetype node into a standalone archetype and include it in other archetype
or template.
For
2006/11/13, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz:
Hi Matiass,
Mattias Forss wrote:
Archetype A and archetype B will have 'correct archetype paths
according to where the fragment was put', but will they refer to the
same paths? When I talked about data I meant what was
Mattias Forss wrote:
Yes, I knew that. There seems to be some options when archetypes need
to reference the same kind of information to be entered in an EHR, e.g
. slots, specialisations, etc. Some EHR data should probably be
limited to be created in only one archetype if it's
2006/11/13, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz:
Mattias Forss wrote:
Yes, I knew that. There seems to be some options when archetypes need
to reference the same kind of information to be entered in an EHR, e.g
. slots, specialisations, etc. Some EHR data should
Hi Thomas,
Thank you very much for your answers. They were quite clear and easy to
understand as they often are. I have some more questions below...
2006/11/7, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz:
I'll just provide some formal answers below.
Mattias Forss wrote:
Hi,
I'm
2006/11/8, Mattias Forss mattias.forss at gmail.com:
We would also like to ask if there is a way of specifying validity for
questions depending on previously answered questions. E.g. if a certain
answer was given from a multiple alternative question (coded_text), then and
only then, some
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061106/a33eaa45/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
On 11/6/06, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.biz wrote:
Another issue is about computation. For example we could want a
quantifiable magnitude to be the result of two previously entered values.
We see this as a application issue = the archetype can limit it to be the
computation of
In een bericht met de datum 6-11-2006 15:57:47 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft rong.acode at gmail.com:
I also think there is a need to support cacluated fields based on other
fields in the archetype. It's possible to express that with assertation, but
it's
just for validation
2006/11/6, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.biz:
Hi Mattias
I'm currently working in a group that has been evaluating archetypes and
they found out that there in archetypes may be needed to add external nodes
from other archetypes instead of only adding complete archetypes as slots.
I believe that in answering this series of questions one has to distinguish
among:
1. what archetypes do - they define valid data based on the constraints of a
clinical concept model;
2. what needs to be done by decision support systems that rely on archetypes,
that is, to make sense of results
2006/11/3, ognian.pishev at oceaninformatics.biz
ognian.pishev at oceaninformatics.biz:
I believe that in answering this series of questions one has to
distinguish
among:
1. what archetypes do - they define valid data based on the constraints of
a
clinical concept model;
2. what needs to
Hi,
I'm currently working in a group that has been evaluating archetypes and
they found out that there in archetypes may be needed to add external nodes
from other archetypes instead of only adding complete archetypes as slots.
Does the current ADL specification allow that external parts from
Mattias Forss mattias.forss at gmail.com wrote:
Hello Mattias,
these are exactly the questions, issues I have been working on for 3 years now.
All I can specify in the HL7 v3 Care Provion Domain model, that is basically
why I apply this method for the time being, waiting for a better tool to
16 matches
Mail list logo
