[RESEND] C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

2006-08-16 Thread Rodrigo Filgueira
Resending, because of problems with the list. Should C_DOMAIN_TYPE classes be defined based (using) on C_PRIMITIVE? and more, are any of the C_PRIMITIVE classes used directly as a constraint to an archetype element? these questions refer to the fact that string or integers by themselves do not

[RESEND] C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

2006-08-16 Thread Rong Chen
Rodrigo Filgueira wrote: Resending, because of problems with the list. Should C_DOMAIN_TYPE classes be defined based (using) on C_PRIMITIVE? I believe a common interface (C_DATA_TYPE) should be extract from these two classes as I pointed in my previous post. Rong and more, are any of the

C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

2006-08-15 Thread Rodrigo Filgueira
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060815/1f2648e2/attachment.html

C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

2006-08-15 Thread Pablo Pazos
validValue(). Pablo Pazos NIB - Original Message - From: Rodrigo Filgueira To: openehr-technical at openehr.org Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:19 PM Subject: C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE Should C_DOMAIN_TYPE classes be defined based (using) on C_PRIMITIVE? and more

C_PRIMITIVE and C_DOMAIN_TYPE

2006-08-15 Thread Rodrigo Filgueira
Should C_DOMAIN_TYPE classes be defined based (using) on C_PRIMITIVE? and more, are any of the C_PRIMITIVE classes used directly as a constraint to an archetype element? these questions refer to the fact that string or integers by themselves do not have any semantic meaning, they acquire