Re: RM Participations name/role?

cal-boun...@lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of David Moner > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 2:46 PM > To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> > Subject: Re: RM Participations name/role? > > > > In the case of Silje, the histopatholog

Re: RM Participations name/role?

2016-12-02 14:22 GMT+01:00 Thomas Beale : > > > I see the case of Silje from a different perspective. What she is asking > is if we can document the participants of each Element inside the Entry. So > far this is not possible, as Entries have been always seen as a whole >

Re: RM Participations name/role?

Hi David, On 24/11/2016 08:18, David Moner wrote: Hi, I'm not sure if this is a correct approach. What in the example you call a function can be in fact a full Action that is being done. That is, if the function is so relevant that you can even assign a dedicated participant to it, it

Re: RM Participations name/role?

openehr-technical- > boun...@lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian McNicoll > *Sent:* Thursday, November 24, 2016 9:49 AM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists. > openehr.org> > *Subject:* Re: RM Participations name/role? > > > > H

Re: RM Participations name/role?

penehr-technical-boun > c...@lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian McNicoll > *Sent:* Thursday, November 24, 2016 9:49 AM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.opene > hr.org> > *Subject:* Re: RM Participations name/role? > > > > H

Re: RM Participations name/role?

.org > <mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org>] On Behalf Of Ian > McNicoll > Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 9:49 AM > To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org > <mailto:openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>> >

RE: RM Participations name/role?

/_9_5_76d0249_1118914287896_171737_4134Report.html, which gave me a 404. Mvh. Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Ian McNicoll Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 9:49 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: RM Particip

Re: RM Participations name/role?

My understanding: Roles are characteristics of an entity (person, device) Functions are characteristics of a service/process I agree with David. The Statement (ENTRY) defines who is involved in that statement. Problem: A Statement is the documented result of a process (Observing,

Re: RM Participations name/role?

Hi David, I think your approach is perfectly valid but I suspect would impose an overhead of complexity that is not always justified or necessary. In the original lab system the kind of individual entry tracking you suggest is probably required to facilitate workflow but by the time it hits the

Re: RM Participations name/role?

Hi, I'm not sure if this is a correct approach. What in the example you call a function can be in fact a full Action that is being done. That is, if the function is so relevant that you can even assign a dedicated participant to it, it should be also enough important to be represented and

Re: RM Participations name/role?

Ok, sounds like a new need ... Ian, do you want to check if there's a PR for that, and if not, add one? This might even be doable in the next release. - thomas On 23/11/2016 12:47, Ian McNicoll wrote: Hi both Agreed. Role = pathologist Function = macroscopic histopath examination. Ian.

Re: RM Participations name/role?

Hi both Agreed. Role = pathologist Function = macroscopic histopath examination. Ian. On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 at 17:32, Thomas Beale wrote: > Hi Silje, > > The PARTICIPATION class > > has a

Re: RM Participations name/role?

Hi Silje, The PARTICIPATION class has a codable attribute 'function' for this purpose (calling it 'function' rather than 'role' came from 13606). It may be that you want to state a 'role' as well, i.e. to say

RM Participations name/role?

Hi, We're wondering if it's possible to specify what the role was of each instance of Participation in an OBSERVATION archetype? For instance in a histopathology result the macroscopic description will often be performed by a different person from the microscopic description. We're thinking