I think maybe actual modelling practice should be taken into account here.
Since these guidelines haven't been available, several important percentages in
published archetypes have been modelled as DV_PROPORTION:
openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.inspired_oxygen.v1
https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1
Hi Silje,
As you say, I think this a case of emerging clarity (or less fog of
confusion!!) as the various use-cases emerge. As the primary author of
both these archetypes, in retrospect I would probably keep inspired_oxygen
as DV_PROPORTION and change pulse_oximetry to DV_QUANTITY but!!! I do not
Amen.
So, do we have a conclusion that toolmakers can reference? Can we document this
somewhere in the specs or elsewhere?
Regards,
Silje
From: openEHR-technical On Behalf
Of Heather Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:22 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: RE: Syntax f
one thing to note: DV_PROPORTION is a more complex data structure. I
would be tempted to try to determine what use has been made of this
archetype so far - i.e. in creating real data. If no real data has been
created, then it could in theory be changed.
- thomas
On 07/01/2019 12:11, Ian McNic
Simple answer - loads of real data - pulse_oximetry and Oxygen levels will
have been recorded hundreds of thousands if not millions of times in
patient data - and Proportion *is* the correct datatype for O2 levels.
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ian
5 matches
Mail list logo
