Hi Silje, As you say, I think this a case of emerging clarity (or less fog of confusion!!) as the various use-cases emerge. As the primary author of both these archetypes, in retrospect I would probably keep inspired_oxygen as DV_PROPORTION and change pulse_oximetry to DV_QUANTITY but!!! I do not see any good argument for changing these now. We have to expect some degree of inconsistency, and live with it, to avoid unnecessary breaking changes.
Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: [email protected] twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected] Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 12:02, Bakke, Silje Ljosland < [email protected]> wrote: > I think maybe actual modelling practice should be taken into account here. > Since these guidelines haven't been available, several important > percentages in published archetypes have been modelled as DV_PROPORTION: > openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.inspired_oxygen.v1 > https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.393 > openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.pulse_oximetry.v1 > https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.3084 > > The way I understand the arguments here, there isn't a good one for > changing these data types and going to v2 for these archetypes? > > Regards, > Silje > > -----Original Message----- > From: openEHR-technical <[email protected]> On > Behalf Of Thomas Beale > Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2019 3:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for % > > > On 05/01/2019 12:56, Ian McNicoll wrote: > > There is a very clear use-case for having it there - O2 levels > > variably and equivalently described a FiO2 which is a unitary > > proportion or percent. > > > > I think we need to keep it for that reason if no other. > > So in that case we need to upgrade the documentation for when to choose a > DV_QUANTITY percent, and when a DV_PROPORTION %. > > - thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
