Bert Verhees schreef:
> Thank you Rahil, for replying.
>
> Rahil Qamar schreef:
>
>> Hi Bert
>>
>> I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which
>> terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very
>> small and limited in scope and content which makes it
simple, given that most of the actual modeling is contained
> in a layer above the schema.
>
> Grahame
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/d
Rahil Qamar wrote:
> Hi Bert
>
> I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which
> terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very
> small and limited in scope and content which makes it fine to be
> available in the current Terminology.xml file. However if
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/97892002/attachment.html>
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
o
.com/xml/blog/2006/05/
> metrics_for_xml_projects_5_str_1.html
>
> could it be relevant to patient record documents?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/d4c53e7f/att
next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/bcc32470/attachment.html>
-- next part --
___
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:22:12AM -, Ian McNicoll wrote:
> This did make me wonder if it is always appropriate to create a detailed
> archetype for this kind of biomedical data, or should it perhaps simply be
> stored/referenced as a blob or link.
In GNUmed we draw the distinction like this:
I like the notion of the Structure Document Complexity Metric
mentioned in this column:
http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/03/usage_schemas_to_tame_odf_and.html
http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2006/05/metrics_for_xml_projects_5_str_1.html
could it be relevant to patient record documents?
Thank you Rahil, for replying.
Rahil Qamar schreef:
> Hi Bert
>
> I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which
> terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very
> small and limited in scope and content which makes it fine to be
> available in the curren
nical at openehr.org
> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
-- next part ------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/688fba44/attachment.html&
ehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/a374bcfe/attachment.html>
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
11 matches
Mail list logo