terminology

2007-03-09 Thread Bert Verhees
Bert Verhees schreef: > Thank you Rahil, for replying. > > Rahil Qamar schreef: > >> Hi Bert >> >> I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which >> terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very >> small and limited in scope and content which makes it

Kitchen-sink standards & the Structure Document Complexity Metric

2007-03-09 Thread Gerard Freriks
simple, given that most of the actual modeling is contained > in a layer above the schema. > > Grahame -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/d

terminology

2007-03-09 Thread Thomas Beale
Rahil Qamar wrote: > Hi Bert > > I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which > terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very > small and limited in scope and content which makes it fine to be > available in the current Terminology.xml file. However if

ECG archetypes

2007-03-09 Thread Sam Heard
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/97892002/attachment.html> -- next part -- ___ openEHR-technical mailing list o

Kitchen-sink standards & the Structure Document Complexity Metric

2007-03-09 Thread Gerard Freriks
.com/xml/blog/2006/05/ > metrics_for_xml_projects_5_str_1.html > > could it be relevant to patient record documents? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/d4c53e7f/att

ECG archetypes

2007-03-09 Thread Gerard Freriks
next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/bcc32470/attachment.html> -- next part -- ___

ECG archetypes

2007-03-09 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:22:12AM -, Ian McNicoll wrote: > This did make me wonder if it is always appropriate to create a detailed > archetype for this kind of biomedical data, or should it perhaps simply be > stored/referenced as a blob or link. In GNUmed we draw the distinction like this:

Kitchen-sink standards & the Structure Document Complexity Metric

2007-03-09 Thread Gavin Brelstaff
I like the notion of the Structure Document Complexity Metric mentioned in this column: http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/03/usage_schemas_to_tame_odf_and.html http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2006/05/metrics_for_xml_projects_5_str_1.html could it be relevant to patient record documents?

terminology

2007-03-09 Thread Bert Verhees
Thank you Rahil, for replying. Rahil Qamar schreef: > Hi Bert > > I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which > terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very > small and limited in scope and content which makes it fine to be > available in the curren

ECG archetypes

2007-03-09 Thread Gerard Freriks
nical at openehr.org > http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical -- next part ------ An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/688fba44/attachment.html&

ECG archetypes

2007-03-09 Thread Ian McNicoll
ehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070309/a374bcfe/attachment.html> -- next part -- ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical