Bert Verhees schreef: > Thank you Rahil, for replying. > > Rahil Qamar schreef: > >> Hi Bert >> >> I had a read through your posting. I have one query though. Which >> terminology are you planning to use? The openEHR terminology is very >> small and limited in scope and content which makes it fine to be >> available in the current Terminology.xml file. However if you are >> planning to use one of the larger, more widely published and used >> terminologies such as SNOMED CT, LOINC, ICD, NANDA, and the rest, you >> might run into problems with trying to convert the terminologies to >> the XML format used for the openEHR terminology. How are you planning >> to handle relationships and concept definitions using the present XSD? >> > It is not that problem. There is a terminology-interface, below, you can > do whatever you want. Webservices/databases, everything is possible. > > My problem is in the interface itself, which seems to me not sufficient, > but maybe I misunderstand, that is why I ask. > I guess, because in three days I get no anwser, the implementation of Terminology is not a part of the public specification. This means, for now, every one will do it in his own way.
I found some example-implementations, on forgotten spots on the openehr website and in the archetype-editor from Mattias Fors and friends. So I have some inspiration to go on. Thanks for your attention Bert _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
