Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Thomas Beale wrote: On 10/03/2010 22:16, Mikael Nystr?m wrote: I belong to a group that, except for openEHR related research, also do research about terminology systems and terminology systems mapping. During mapping from one terminology system to another terminology system is it quite

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Hi Mikael, You may be interested in our mapping tool, Snapper, which is designed to tackle this problem for mapping to (not from) SNOMED CT. It provides extensive support for mapping to post-coordinated expressions where single-concept maps are not possible and can be used to create

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Mikael Nystr?m wrote: I agree that we have to wait and see how much problems we will get. That was also my reason to reply to Sebastian's e-mail which told that there is no problem to add terminology bindings after the archetypes are finalized. However, I didn't refer to theoretical worst

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

For those of you interested in the 'problems' within Snomed as an ontology, here (http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3465/version/1) you can find a good and recent article describing them. This doesn't mean we shouldn't use Snomed, but knowing where the problems are is helpful to find

Snomed ontological solidity (was term bindings in archetypes and templates)

, and at the moment, I need some convincing. thanks for listening - thomas beale * * -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100311/1da48cb2/attachment.html

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the comments and advice. See my brief notes below. To allow an empty purpose there is an option in the Java Parser (one of the parameters when constructing the Parser). If set to true, it should parse these archetypes ok. (Note that however according to the openEHR

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Dear Thomas, Mikael and Michael Thanks for the useful comments which I will try to digest and incorporate into my study. I note that two of my original questions remain unanswered - Are there any mature templates - linked to existing archetypes which I could use to extract bindings? These

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100311/10bf881f/attachment.html

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Thanks Stef, It's a nice paper indeed, and it formulates the confusions I had about SNOMED, which is covering different perspectives of the medical reality. But this leads me to questions I have precisely about the bindings of the ontology part of the archetype. They may need to be more

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Thanks Stef, It's a nice paper indeed, and it formulates the confusions I had about SNOMED, which is covering different perspectives of the medical reality. But this leads me to questions I have precisely about the bindings of the ontology part of the archetype. They may need to be more

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

On 11-Mar-10 12:59, Stef Verlinden wrote: For those of you interested in the 'problems' within Snomed as an ontology, here (http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3465/version/1) you can find a good and recent article describing them. This doesn't mean we shouldn't use Snomed, but knowing

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100311/a958d805

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100311/0c337f22/attachment.html