Re: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-04-05 Thread Philippe Ameline
Le 05/04/2018 à 15:43, Thomas Beale a écrit : > we really should build a combined descriptive architecture to show how > all this fits together to solve: > > * the continuum of deterministic - non-deterministic utterances > possible in healthcare > * the linguistic interface v structured i

Re: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-04-05 Thread Philippe Ameline
Le 05/04/2018 à 15:24, GF a écrit : > Philippe, > > Can I understand that you file-guide are patterns that fit archetypes > so Healthcare Providers can compose whatever they want. > The file-guides insertions are context driven. > The system of file-guides acts like an Ontology for > clinical/admi

Re: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-04-05 Thread Thomas Beale
On 05/04/2018 13:50, Philippe Ameline wrote: In my mind, fils guides and archetype are of different kind: an archetype is a flexible information schema and nodes that were "build using this mold" keep a link to it ; on the contrary, a fil guide is nothing more than a UI helper that makes a

Re: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-04-05 Thread GF
Philippe, Can I understand that you file-guide are patterns that fit archetypes so Healthcare Providers can compose whatever they want. The file-guides insertions are context driven. The system of file-guides acts like an Ontology for clinical/administrative content. Archetypes define how things

Re: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-04-05 Thread Philippe Ameline
Le 05/04/2018 à 12:16, Thomas Beale a écrit : > On 02/04/2018 18:38, Philippe Ameline wrote: >> >> Actually, I don't think that I use grammar in an unusual way. If I do >> it technically, lets assume for the sake of the discussion that I am >> really talking about a grammar, ie a set of rules that

Re: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-04-05 Thread Thomas Beale
On 02/04/2018 18:38, Philippe Ameline wrote: Actually, I don't think that I use grammar in an unusual way. If I do it technically, lets assume for the sake of the discussion that I am really talking about a grammar, ie a set of rules that allows you to interpret an arrangement of concepts a