Re: SNOMED CT constraint syntax - for querying instances or terminology?

2015-10-01 Thread Bert Verhees
I am following this discussion with great interest, just wanted you and Michael to know, just in case you would want to stop it or have it private, which I would regret. Bert On 30-09-15 09:20, Thomas Beale wrote: ok - so the query would be applied to instances in a drug database (each

Re: SNOMED CT constraint syntax - for querying instances or terminology?

2015-10-01 Thread Michael.Lawley
This is indeed the intent: the language has been design to cater exactly for this extension. I can't say that there's any international content about to come out with this addition numeric modelling, but Australia has been publishing this kind of content in the Australian Medicines Terminology

Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

2015-10-01 Thread Heather Leslie
Hi everyone, I'm seeking community input around a conundrum that has arisen regarding archetype governance or, more specifically, if we should offer a new version of an archetype that included breaking changes/corrections according to the openEHR specifications but which are not critical in

Re: SNOMED CT constraint syntax - for querying instances or terminology?

2015-10-01 Thread David Moner
Hello, At this point I think that is the only option. I want to believe that the SNOMED CT Expression Constraint Language has been designed with a future evolution of SNOMED CT in mind, where concepts will be enriched with numerical values. For example, SNOMED CT now contains a set of Virtual