Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-24 Thread Enrico Jörns
Hi, Am Freitag, dem 03.02.2023 um 22:07 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Belloni: > This breaks oe-selftest: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/4760/steps/15/logs/stdio thanks for having this thrown on the autobuilder! > 2023-02-03 17:55:08,025 - oe-selftest - INFO - >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
There was a parallel conversation on the irc meanwhile; we've concluded that Enrico will look into adding qemu based tests for barebox into oe-selftest like we already have for EFI bootloaders, and there will be a new patchset then. Alex On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 16:01, Enrico Jörns wrote: > > Am M

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Enrico Jörns
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.02.2023 um 15:11 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 14:53, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > > I think the Barebox inside OE-Core allows a bigger integration and > > reuse of existing tooling for signing and other classes currently well > > integrated with U-Boo

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Em qua., 15 de fev. de 2023 às 11:11, Alexander Kanavin escreveu: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 14:53, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > > I think the Barebox inside OE-Core allows a bigger integration and > > reuse of existing tooling for signing and other classes currently well > > integrated with U-Boot

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 14:53, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I think the Barebox inside OE-Core allows a bigger integration and > reuse of existing tooling for signing and other classes currently well > integrated with U-Boot. For me, a critical point for decision is if > Pengutronix will commit to supp

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Enrico Jörns
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.02.2023 um 10:53 -0300 schrieb Otavio Salvador: > Em qua., 15 de fev. de 2023 às 10:44, Alexander Kanavin > escreveu: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 12:22, Otavio Salvador > > wrote: > > > > Fair enough, I'm open to the idea. It would be interesting/useful to > > > > see if anyone

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Em qua., 15 de fev. de 2023 às 10:44, Alexander Kanavin escreveu: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 12:22, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > >> Fair enough, I'm open to the idea. It would be interesting/useful to > >> see if anyone else in the community is in favour of this or not. I'm > >> sure you appreciate w

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Enrico Jörns
Am Mittwoch, dem 15.02.2023 um 14:43 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 12:22, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > > > Fair enough, I'm open to the idea. It would be interesting/useful to > > > see if anyone else in the community is in favour of this or not. I'm > > > sure you apprec

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 12:22, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Fair enough, I'm open to the idea. It would be interesting/useful to >> see if anyone else in the community is in favour of this or not. I'm >> sure you appreciate why we need to ask the question and why we can't >> just add everything! :) >>

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Richard, Em ter., 14 de fev. de 2023 às 10:56, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu: > Fair enough, I'm open to the idea. It would be interesting/useful to > see if anyone else in the community is in favour of this or not. I'm > sure you appreciate why we need to as

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-14 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 10:46 +0100, Enrico Jörns wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Am Freitag, dem 03.02.2023 um 14:17 + schrieb Richard Purdie: > > On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 14:50 +0100, Marco Felsch wrote: > > > This adds the support for the barebox bootloader to oe-core. The recipe > > > is based on the

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-14 Thread Enrico Jörns
Hi Richard, Am Freitag, dem 03.02.2023 um 14:17 + schrieb Richard Purdie: > On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 14:50 +0100, Marco Felsch wrote: > > This adds the support for the barebox bootloader to oe-core. The recipe > > is based on the recipe found in meta-ptx [1] with a few minor adaptions. > > > > T

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-03 Thread Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org
This breaks oe-selftest: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/4760/steps/15/logs/stdio 2023-02-03 17:55:08,025 - oe-selftest - INFO - fitimage.FitImageTests.test_sign_cascaded_uboot_fit_image (subunit.RemotedTestCase) 2023-02-03 17:55:08,026 - oe-selftest - INFO -

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 14:50 +0100, Marco Felsch wrote: > This adds the support for the barebox bootloader to oe-core. The recipe > is based on the recipe found in meta-ptx [1] with a few minor adaptions. > > This basic support includes the bootloader and the target tools to > interact with the boo

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] barebox: add initial support

2023-02-03 Thread Marco Felsch
This adds the support for the barebox bootloader to oe-core. The recipe is based on the recipe found in meta-ptx [1] with a few minor adaptions. This basic support includes the bootloader and the target tools to interact with the bootloader. The host tools support is not part of this commit. This