On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 11:48:21 AM NZDT Alejandro Enedino Hernandez
Samaniego wrote:
> On 01/22/2018 12:28 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > It seems to me we need to do one of two things:
> >
> > A) Add explicit RPROVIDES so that the core package provides these things
> > for compatibility with
Hey Paul,
On 01/22/2018 12:28 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 8:02:07 AM NZDT Alejandro Enedino Hernandez
Samaniego wrote:
Its backwards compatible, in the way that the usage should be the same,
in this case, this sort of failures are expected, since the
Hi Alejandro,
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 8:02:07 AM NZDT Alejandro Enedino Hernandez
Samaniego wrote:
> Its backwards compatible, in the way that the usage should be the same,
> in this case, this sort of failures are expected, since the mentioned
> packages: enum, readline, textutils no
