Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 19/19] epiphany: update to 3.22.1

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin > --- > .../epiphany/{epiphany_3.20.3.bb => epiphany_3.22.1.bb} | 6 > +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image

> On Oct 19, 2016, at 1:19 AM, thilo.ceston...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote: > > Hey! > > I want to create such a nice toolchain installation package for my image > recipe. > The problem I currently hit is, that I need to do populate_sdk and > populate_sdk_qt5 to have qt5 toolchain too. > > Now I

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On 10/19/2016 11:39 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 19 October 2016 at 22:15, Denys Dmytriyenko > wrote: > > > > But do we need to bump PE to ensure upgrade path and proper sorting? > > > > I don't think so, since the whole U-Boot version got

Re: [OE-core] [master][morty][krogoth][PATCH] musl: Security fix CVE-2016-8859

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Armin Kuster wrote: > From: Armin Kuster > > CVE-2016-8859: TRE & musl libc regex integer overflows in buffer size > computations > > Affects musl <= 1.1.15 this is ok. I have a version bump planned for master soon

[OE-core] [master][morty][krogoth][PATCH] musl: Security fix CVE-2016-8859

From: Armin Kuster CVE-2016-8859: TRE & musl libc regex integer overflows in buffer size computations Affects musl <= 1.1.15 Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta/recipes-core/musl/files/CVE-2016-8859.patch | 79

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:34 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >   so, i'm home and on a different system about to do a build ... > refresh my memory, where are all those nativesdk rpms supposed to > show > up? if memory serves, they were under tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64_linux. > anything i should set

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:34 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >   so, i'm home and on a different system about to do a build ... > > refresh my memory, where are all those nativesdk rpms supposed to > > show > > up? if memory serves, they were under

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 08:52 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:42:27 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > >  > > > > i was reading this: > > > > > > > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On 19 October 2016 at 22:15, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > But do we need to bump PE to ensure upgrade path and proper sorting? > > > > I don't think so, since the whole U-Boot version got updated. > > Still, v.YY will always sort higher than .YY no matter what digits >

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:42:27 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:00:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/19/2016 10:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot > >> version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm"

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On 10/19/2016 10:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot >> version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the >> PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated

[OE-core] Question for OE variable "LABELS"

The current OE document has this LABELS variable and OE has some code to support its usage. But if I just set LABELS in a BSP conf or local.conf file, the build will show the warning message: WARNING: core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_bootimg: Found potential conflicted var LABELS, please use

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] u-boot: Factor out common bits

On 10/19/2016 10:13 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:09PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> The u-boot recipes share a couple of common variables, which makes >> updating of the recipes error prone and a toil. Factor those common >> bits into u-boot-common_${PV}.inc so that

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] kernel-arch.bbclass: Add xtensa and arc into valid_archs table

Thanks. I will add the test for TARGET_OS in a separate patch. > -Original Message- > From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:53 AM > To: Bystricky, Juro > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:26PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 10/19/2016 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot > >version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the > >PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] u-boot: Update to 2016.09.01 release

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Upgrade U-Boot to the latest version. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Richard Purdie > Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] u-boot: Factor out common bits

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:09PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > The u-boot recipes share a couple of common variables, which makes > updating of the recipes error prone and a toil. Factor those common > bits into u-boot-common_${PV}.inc so that they are in one place. > > The u-boot_${PV}.bb now

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] u-boot: Drop redundant comment

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Drop comment stating that the SRCREV corresponds to particular U-Boot > version. This comment is redundant, since the U-Boot version is part > of the recipe filename. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Richard Purdie

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] u-boot: Drop the +git part from PV

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > The U-Boot package is using release versions of U-Boot, > so drop the extra +git part from PV. As long as it's using release-based SRCREV, should be fine. IIRC, +git suffix was from the days when we needed to pick up additional

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot > version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the > PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by removing the leading 'v'. Finally! But do we need

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:42:27 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016,

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > not sure how dumb a question

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/19] Recipe updates and version check fixes

Alexander, On 10/19/2016 08:06 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: This is a bunch of assorted version updates, and upstream check fixes. I have also re-enabled gobject introspection on musl (seems to work now). Some version updates are held off by the need to update glib/gtk first, or are more

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE > > > > > > >

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE > > > > > > build, i saw the growing number of "nativesdk" rpms piling up

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE > > > > build, i saw the growing number of "nativesdk" rpms piling up under > > tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64_linux, and wanted to

Re: [OE-core] [OE-Core][meta-oe][PATCH] glmark2: Enabling c++ 11 features

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 11:49 PM, Amarnath Valluri > wrote: > > > > On Friday 14 October 2016 05:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Amarnath Valluri >> wrote: >>> > The failure

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman: get the correct network interface name from dmesg during NFS booting

Hi Christopher, Thanks for applying the required changes under below commit, https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/compare/master...kergoth:connman-systemd-nfs Are there any plans to submit it to OE-core? Regards, Jagadeesh On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Jagadeesh

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] sstate-sysroot-cruft: Add /etc/ld.so.conf to whitelist

* it reports at least 2 issues in every build (this file in native and target sysroot) add it to whitelist Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- scripts/sstate-sysroot-cruft.sh | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/sstate-sysroot-cruft.sh

Re: [OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE > build, i saw the growing number of "nativesdk" rpms piling up under > tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64_linux, and wanted to examine a couple of them > later, but after the sysroot was (i

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] test-dependencies.sh: Strip also '\.bb: .*' before adding failed recipe to list of failed

From: Martin Jansa * format of bitbake tasks changed in: 2c88afb taskdata/runqueue: Rewrite without use of ID indirection -ERROR: Task 4 (/OE/build/oe-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/sftp.bb, do_fetch) failed with exit code '1' +ERROR: Task

[OE-core] how can i ask to keep all the generated "nativesdk" rpms?

not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE build, i saw the growing number of "nativesdk" rpms piling up under tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64_linux, and wanted to examine a couple of them later, but after the sysroot was (i assume) populated with all of these rpms, that entire

[OE-core] [PATCH 07/19] cmake: update to 3.6.2

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- .../cmake/{cmake-native_3.6.1.bb => cmake-native_3.6.2.bb}| 0 meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc | 4 ++-- meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/{cmake_3.6.1.bb => cmake_3.6.2.bb}

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 16:02 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: > On 19-10-16 14:53, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > > > On 18 October 2016 at 22:21, Paul Eggleton > el.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > Q: Do I need to declare a runtime

[OE-core] [PATCH 19/19] epiphany: update to 3.22.1

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- .../epiphany/{epiphany_3.20.3.bb => epiphany_3.22.1.bb} | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-gnome/epiphany/{epiphany_3.20.3.bb => epiphany_3.22.1.bb} (77%) diff

[OE-core] [PATCH 18/19] webkitgtk: update to 2.14.1

Rebase 0001-WebKitMacros-Append-to-I-and-not-to-isystem.patch Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- ...bKitMacros-Append-to-I-and-not-to-isystem.patch | 272 + .../{webkitgtk_2.12.5.bb => webkitgtk_2.14.1.bb} | 26 +- 2 files changed, 128

[OE-core] [PATCH 17/19] vala: update to 0.34.1

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-devtools/vala/vala.inc | 2 +- meta/recipes-devtools/vala/{vala_0.32.1.bb => vala_0.34.1.bb} | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [PATCH 14/19] mpg123: update to 1.23.8

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/{mpg123_1.23.6.bb => mpg123_1.23.8.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/{mpg123_1.23.6.bb => mpg123_1.23.8.bb} (95%) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 16/19] nss: update to 3.27.1

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-support/nss/nss/pqg.c-ULL_addend.patch | 8 meta/recipes-support/nss/{nss_3.25.bb => nss_3.27.1.bb} | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [PATCH 15/19] nspr: update to 4.13

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-support/nspr/{nspr_4.12.bb => nspr_4.13.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/nspr/{nspr_4.12.bb => nspr_4.13.bb} (96%) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 12/19] libksba: update to 1.3.5

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-support/libksba/{libksba_1.3.4.bb => libksba_1.3.5.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/libksba/{libksba_1.3.4.bb => libksba_1.3.5.bb} (86%) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 13/19] lighttpd: update to 1.4.42

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- .../lighttpd/{lighttpd_1.4.41.bb => lighttpd_1.4.42.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-extended/lighttpd/{lighttpd_1.4.41.bb => lighttpd_1.4.42.bb} (94%) diff

[OE-core] [PATCH 08/19] dtc: update to 1.4.2

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-kernel/dtc/{dtc_git.bb => dtc_1.4.2.bb} | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-kernel/dtc/{dtc_git.bb => dtc_1.4.2.bb} (75%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/dtc/dtc_git.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH 10/19] gnome-desktop3: update to 3.22.1

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- .../{gnome-desktop3_3.20.2.bb => gnome-desktop3_3.22.1.bb}| 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-gnome/gnome-desktop/{gnome-desktop3_3.20.2.bb => gnome-desktop3_3.22.1.bb}

[OE-core] [PATCH 09/19] ffmpeg: update to 3.1.4

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-multimedia/ffmpeg/{ffmpeg_3.1.3.bb => ffmpeg_3.1.4.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-multimedia/ffmpeg/{ffmpeg_3.1.3.bb => ffmpeg_3.1.4.bb} (97%) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 11/19] gnutls: update to 3.5.5

Remove backported 0001-Use-correct-include-dir-with-minitasn.patch and CVE-2016-7444.patch (which still applied silently and incorrectly: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450). Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 06/19] btrfs-tools: update to 4.8.1

Remove fix-parallel.patch as version.h is now generated by autoconf in configure() Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- .../btrfs-tools/btrfs-tools/fix-parallel.patch | 32 -- .../{btrfs-tools_4.7.1.bb => btrfs-tools_4.8.1.bb} | 3 +-

[OE-core] [PATCH 02/19] mklibs-native: fix upstream version check

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-devtools/mklibs/mklibs-native_0.1.41.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/mklibs/mklibs-native_0.1.41.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/mklibs/mklibs-native_0.1.41.bb index

[OE-core] [PATCH 04/19] pigz: fix upstream version check

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz.inc | 2 -- meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz_2.3.3.bb | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 05/19] boost: update to 1.62.0

Remove backported 0003-smart_ptr-mips-assembly-doesn-t-compile-in-mips16e-m.patch Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- ...bjam-native_1.61.0.bb => bjam-native_1.62.0.bb} | 0 .../boost/{boost-1.61.0.inc => boost-1.62.0.inc} | 4 +-

[OE-core] [PATCH 03/19] cve-check-tool: fix upstream version check

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-devtools/cve-check-tool/cve-check-tool_5.6.4.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/cve-check-tool/cve-check-tool_5.6.4.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH 01/19] musl: enable gobject introspection

It's working with recent versions of musl, so there's no reason to keep it disabled. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-musl.inc | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-musl.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 00/19] Recipe updates and version check fixes

This is a bunch of assorted version updates, and upstream check fixes. I have also re-enabled gobject introspection on musl (seems to work now). Some version updates are held off by the need to update glib/gtk first, or are more involved (openssl), they will come later. The following changes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

On 19 October 2016 at 15:02, Mike Looijmans wrote: > busybox could RRPOVIDE tar? >> > > If we go down that road, we'd end up with a busybox that RPROVIDES a > hundred and one utilities. I doubt anyone will be happy with that... > Well, only for the utilities which are

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

On 19-10-16 14:53, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 October 2016 at 22:21, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > Q: Do I need to declare a runtime dependency that typically comes > > from busybox (tar)? > > Yes, because some

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: allow using EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS for subpackages

Ping? Any comments? Thank you, Andrii On 10.10.16 20:02, Andrii Bordunov wrote: Some packages containing shared libraries might be registered as shlib providers when they shouldn't (for example, the lib is for their private use and must not generate any dependency). EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

On 18 October 2016 at 22:21, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > Q: Do I need to declare a runtime dependency that typically comes > > > from busybox (tar)? > > > > Yes, because some people try to eliminate busybox from their image. > > How would one express such a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

On 10/19/2016 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by removing the leading 'v'. Don't drop the 'v'. Package versions need to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] u-boot: Update to 2016.09.01 release

On 10/19/2016 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: Upgrade U-Boot to the latest version. Patches 3 and 5 should be squashed into this one. Alex -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

[OE-core] [PATCH] buildhistory-collect-srcrevs: Fix multiple SRCREV definitions

From: Tobias Hagelborn Fixed copy & paste error causing error when extracting SRCREV for packages containing multiple SRCREV definitons. Signed-off-by: Tobias Hagelborn --- scripts/buildhistory-collect-srcrevs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Remove $COREBASE/LICENSE from LIC_FILES_CHKSUM

Several recipes reference the LICENSE file in their LIC_FILES_CHKSUM variable as ${COREBASE}/LICENSE. This forces distribution providers to keep this file verbatim or to overload the affected recipes. The section "Moving to the Yocto Project 1.6 Release" in the Yocto manual suggests removing the

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] $COREBASE/LICENSE in LIC_FILES_CHKSUM

I ran into QA issues when inadvertently replacing OEs LICENSE with Yoctos LICENSE file. Why should recipes depend on the license for the complete collection of layers? At least for "normal" recipes that generate target device packages, this makes no sense to me. I patched out the global LICENSE

[OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image

Hey! I want to create such a nice toolchain installation package for my image recipe. The problem I currently hit is, that I need to do populate_sdk and populate_sdk_qt5 to have qt5 toolchain too. Now I had an idea to create a recipe for the SDK like: -- SUMMARY = "Meta package for

[OE-core] [PATCH] buildstats: check IMAGE_ROOTFS exists before checking its size

After 0d6b7276003f1afabc6de683f663540327d52bdc, the exceptions are correctly checked if the rootfs size check fails. In case of a failure a build error is triggered. However, there are cases where this is known to fail (e.g., with meta-swupd the rootfs for swupd images is other than